Comparison Overview
Bouygues Telecom Business

Bouygues Telecom Business
13 avenue du Maréchal Juin, Meudon-la-Forêt, 92, FR
Last Update: 28/03/2026
Notre métier ? Vous proposer des solutions adaptées à votre activité : Téléphonie Fixe et Mobile, Internet et Réseaux, Services et prestations. Depuis 1997, Bouygues Telecom Entreprises s’engage à vous proposer des solutions de communications conçues pour vous permet...

ACN
1000 Progress Place, Concord, 28025-2449, US
Last Update: 01/04/2026
ACN is the leading direct selling telecommunications and essential services provider. ACN Inc. was founded in 1993 by four entrepreneurs and is now operating in North America. ACN offers essential products and services that people use every day, while also offering a po...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Bouygues Telecom Business







ACN






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Bouygues Telecom Business in 2026.
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for ACN in 2026.
Incident History - Bouygues Telecom Business (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Bouygues Telecom Business cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - ACN (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ACN cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Bouygues Telecom Business

ACN
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.