Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Boston Scientific

Boston Scientific Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

bostonscientific.com

Boston Scientific transforms lives through innovative medical technologies that improve the health of patients around the world. As a global medical technology leader for more than 40 years, we advance science for life by providing a broad range of high-performance solutions that address unmet patient needs and reduce the cost of health care. Our portfolio of devices and therapies helps physicians diagnose and treat complex cardiovascular, respiratory, digestive, oncological, neurological and urological diseases and conditions. For more information, visit www.bostonscientific.com and connect with us on X, Instagram, and Facebook. At Boston Scientific, you will find purpose, a place to grow and opportunities to cultivate your passions.


Boston Scientific A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Boston Scientific
Company Information
Website:http://www.bostonscientific.com
Employees number:55,130
Number of followers:1,506,394
NAICS:3391
Industry Type:Medical Equipment Manufacturing
Homepage:bostonscientific.com
Boston Scientific Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 0 and 549
logo
Boston ScientificMedical Equipment Manufacturing
Updated:
09/09/2026
505/1000
Critical
C
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
✖ Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
Boston Scientific Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
Boston ScientificMedical Equipment Manufacturing
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

Boston ScientificCritical
Current Score
505C (CRITICAL)
01000
5 incidents
-78.25 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
OCTOBER 2026
512Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2026
503Before Incident
AUGUST 2026
514Before Incident
Cyber Attack
26 Aug 2026 • Boston Scientific
Boston Scientific: Medical device maker Boston Scientific is being hit by a cyberattack. The shares are falling

Boston Scientific Cyberattack Disrupting Operations and Shipments

502After Incident
CRITICAL-12
BOS1787747364
Boston Scientific Hit by Cyberattack, Disrupting Operations and Shipments Boston Scientific, a $72 billion medical device manufacturer specializing in products like pacemakers and stents, disclosed a cyberattack in an SEC filing on Wednesday, causing operational disruptions and a decline in its stock price. Shares fell 5% in premarket trading, adding to a nearly 50% drop this year following a weak first-quarter profit forecast. The attack has impaired the company’s access to critical information systems and applications, including shipment services, with no clear timeline for full restoration. While Boston Scientific is working to recover affected functions, the ongoing incident continues to hinder product shipments. The extent of the breach and its potential impact on patient care or data security remain undisclosed. The disclosure underscores the growing cybersecurity risks facing healthcare and medical device companies, where operational disruptions can have cascading effects on supply chains and market confidence.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Cyberattack
IMPACT
Systems Affected: Critical information systems and applications, shipment servicesOperational Impact: Disrupted operations and product shipmentsBrand Reputation Impact: Decline in stock price (5% premarket drop, nearly 50% drop this year)
JULY 2026
676Before Incident
Ransomware
25 Jul 2026 • Boston Scientific
Ceva Logistics and Boston Scientific: Ceva Logistics sued over theft of employee records during data breach

Cyberattack on Ceva Logistics Exposes Employee Data, Sparks Class Action Lawsuit

506After Incident
CRITICAL-170
CEVBOS1788361807
Cyberattack on Ceva Logistics Exposes Employee Data, Sparks Class Action Lawsuit A former employee has filed a class action lawsuit against Ceva Logistics, alleging the global freight provider failed to safeguard sensitive personal data stolen in a July cyberattack that disrupted operations across eight warehouses in the Netherlands and Europe. The breach, attributed to the CoinbaseCartel ransomware group, compromised employee information, including bank account details and Social Security numbers. The lawsuit, filed in late August in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, claims Ceva neglected to implement adequate security measures despite a prior ransomware attack in September 2025, which the company never publicly disclosed. The complaint also alleges Ceva has not formally notified affected employees, leaving them vulnerable to fraud with the plaintiff reporting credit card fraud and increased spam calls as direct consequences. The filing seeks class action status, citing at least 100 impacted employees (potentially thousands) and demanding $5 million in damages for alleged negligence, breach of contract, and unjust enrichment. The lawsuit argues Ceva prioritized cost-cutting over security, using "cheaper, ineffective measures" that left data exposed. The incident coincides with leadership changes at Ceva, including the departure of two IT executives VP of IT Infrastructure Bryant Duke (November 2025) and Global CIO Susanne Shustein (March 2026). Parent company CMA CGM Group also reassigned Ceva’s CEO, Mathieu Friedberg, to a new role overseeing cybersecurity transformation, signaling broader concerns about enterprise-wide vulnerabilities. Healthcare Sector Also Targeted In a separate incident, McKesson Corp. confirmed a cybersecurity breach last week, with hackers allegedly the ShinyHunter group stealing customer and employee data from two business units. The group is demanding a $55 million ransom to prevent public release. McKesson joins a growing list of healthcare and medical device firms hit by ransomware in 2026, including Boston Scientific, which suffered a network outage in a recent attack.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Ransomware
MOTIVATION
Financial gain
IMPACT
Financial Loss: $5 million (claimed damages)Data Compromised: Bank account details, Social Security numbersSystems Affected: Warehouse operations in the Netherlands and EuropeOperational Impact: Disrupted operations across eight warehousesBrand Reputation Impact: YesLegal Liabilities: Class action lawsuit filedIdentity Theft Risk: Yes (credit card fraud, increased spam calls reported)Payment Information Risk: Yes
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: Employee personal dataNumber Of Records Exposed: At least 100 (potentially thousands)Sensitivity Of Data: High (bank account details, Social Security numbers)Personally Identifiable Information: Yes (Social Security numbers, bank account details)
JUNE 2026
673Before Incident
MAY 2026
679Before Incident
Cyber Attack
05 May 2026 • Boston Scientific
DAEMON Tools: DAEMON Tools Breach Used to Spread Malware in Supply Chain Attack

DAEMON Tools Supply Chain Attack Distributes Backdoors via Trojanized Installers

666After Incident
CRITICAL-13
DIS1777998353
DAEMON Tools Supply Chain Attack Distributes Backdoors via Trojanized Installers In May 2026, Kaspersky researchers uncovered a sophisticated supply chain attack targeting users of DAEMON Tools, a widely used disk image mounting software. The compromised installers versions 12.5.0.2421 through 12.5.0.2434 were distributed directly from the official website beginning April 8, 2026, and remained available for nearly a month. The attackers embedded malicious payloads in three core binaries within the installation directory (DTHelper.exe, DiscSoftBusServiceLite.exe, and DTShellHlp.exe). Upon execution at system startup, the malware triggered a backdoor that communicated with a typosquatted command-and-control (C2) domain env-check.daemontools[.]cc registered on March 27, 2026, just days before the attack commenced. The campaign affected thousands of systems across over 100 countries, with the majority of victims located in Russia, Brazil, Turkey, Spain, Germany, France, Italy, and China. While 90% of infections targeted individual users, a smaller subset of retail, scientific, government, and manufacturing organizations primarily in Russia, Belarus, and Thailand received advanced payloads, suggesting a targeted espionage or "big game hunting" motive. The attack employed a three-stage payload chain: 1. Information Collector (*envchk.exe*) – A .NET-based tool that harvested system details (MAC address, hostname, installed software, processes) and exfiltrated data to 38.180.107[.]76. The presence of Chinese-language strings in its code pointed to a likely Chinese-speaking threat actor. 2. Minimalistic Backdoor (*cdg.exe*) – An RC4-encrypted shellcode loader deployed to roughly a dozen high-value machines, enabling file downloads, command execution, and in-memory shellcode deployment. 3. QUIC RAT – A sophisticated C++ implant, observed in a single attack against a Russian educational institution, featuring multi-protocol C2 communication (HTTP, UDP, TCP, WSS, QUIC, DNS, HTTP/3) and process injection capabilities. The trojanized installers were signed with legitimate digital certificates from AVB Disc Soft, the software’s developer, allowing them to bypass security tools. Key indicators of compromise (IOCs) include the malicious C2 domain, the IP address 38.180.107[.]76, and specific file hashes for the infected installers and payloads. Suspicious file paths, such as C:\Windows\Temp\envchk.exe and %AppData%\Microsoft\mcrypto.dat, were also identified.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Supply Chain Attack
MOTIVATION
EspionageBig Game Hunting
IMPACT
Data Compromised: System details (MAC address, hostname, installed software, processes), potentially sensitive data from high-value targetsSystems Affected: Thousands of systems across over 100 countriesBrand Reputation Impact: Likely significant due to distribution from official websiteIdentity Theft Risk: High (personally identifiable information potentially exposed)
DATA BREACH
System detailsPersonally Identifiable InformationSensitivity Of Data: High (for targeted organizations)Data Encryption: RC4 (for shellcode)
APRIL 2026
675Before Incident
MARCH 2026
675Before Incident
FEBRUARY 2026
671Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
668Before Incident
DECEMBER 2025
778Before Incident
Ransomware
01 Dec 2025 • Boston Scientific
Veradigm, Aesto, CareCloud and Boston Scientific: Electronic health record company says customer data stolen in breach

Veradigm Data Breach Exposes Patient Information in Vendor-Linked Cyberattack

660After Incident
CRITICAL-118
CARVERAESBOS1788978256
Veradigm Data Breach Exposes Patient Information in Vendor-Linked Cyberattack Veradigm, a Chicago-based electronic health records provider serving thousands of hospitals and physicians worldwide, disclosed a data breach on Tuesday after hackers infiltrated a vendor’s systems and stole sensitive customer information, including Social Security numbers. The company, which reported $594 million in 2024 revenue, revealed in an SEC filing that an unauthorized party obtained credentials from the vendor’s environment to access a Veradigm API, enabling the theft of personal data though no clinical or medical records were compromised. The breach was confined to a specific interface, with no impact on Veradigm’s broader infrastructure or operations. While the exact timeline remains unclear, the incident has been reported to law enforcement, and an investigation is ongoing. Veradigm has not responded to requests for further comment. The Gentlemen ransomware gang, which has targeted multiple healthcare organizations since emerging last fall, claimed responsibility for the attack, asserting it stole records of 3.5 million patients. The group recently breached other healthcare entities, including Nutex and AnMed. Veradigm, formerly known as Allscripts, has faced prior cybersecurity incidents, including a 2019 SamSam ransomware attack that disrupted hospital operations and led to class action lawsuits. In December 2025, the company reported another breach affecting 2.6 million individuals, stemming from an incident in late 2024. The healthcare sector remains a prime target for cyberattacks, with millions of records exposed in recent months. Aesto disclosed a breach affecting 9 million individuals last week, while Baylor Genetics reported the theft of 2.8 million medical testing records in June. Other incidents, including a March breach at CareCloud and recent attacks on Paylogix, have further highlighted vulnerabilities in health data security. Separately, Boston Scientific confirmed ongoing operational disruptions from a cyberattack, which has hindered its distribution network and remote monitoring systems for cardiac devices. The company expects the incident to impact financial performance, delaying its ability to meet quarterly net sales targets. While some systems have been restored, full recovery remains uncertain.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Breach
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Sensitive customer information, including Social Security numbersSystems Affected: Specific API interface (no broader infrastructure impact)Operational Impact: No impact on broader operationsIdentity Theft Risk: High (Social Security numbers exposed)
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: Personal Identifiable Information (PII)Number Of Records Exposed: 3.5 million (claimed by threat actor)Sensitivity Of Data: High (Social Security numbers, customer information)Data Exfiltration: YesPersonally Identifiable Information: Social Security numbers
NOVEMBER 2025
797Before Incident
MAY 2023
830Before Incident
Ransomware
01 May 2023 • Boston Scientific
Medical Device Company (Tampa, Florida)

BlackCat (ALPHV) Ransomware Attacks on Five U.S. Companies by Insider Threat Actors (2023)

760After Incident
CRITICAL-70
BOS5595255110425
Federal prosecutors in the U.S. accused a trio—including Ryan Clifford Goldberg, Kevin Tyler Martin, and an unnamed co-conspirator—of deploying BlackCat (ALPHV) ransomware against this Tampa-based medical device firm in May 2023. The attackers infiltrated the company’s network, exfiltrated sensitive data, and encrypted systems, demanding a $10 million ransom. While negotiations reduced the payment, the company ultimately transferred $1.274 million in cryptocurrency to regain access to its systems and prevent further data leaks. The attack disrupted operations, risked exposure of proprietary medical device designs, and compromised internal employee and customer data—including potentially health records, financial details, and intellectual property. The incident forced the company to engage in costly incident response, legal consultations, and system recovery efforts. The FBI’s investigation later revealed that one of the perpetrators (Goldberg) was a cybersecurity incident response manager at Sygnia, exploiting insider knowledge to facilitate the attack. The breach not only caused financial losses but also reputational damage, as the company’s failure to prevent the attack eroded trust among partners and clients. The case remains under legal scrutiny, with two defendants facing up to 50 years in prison if convicted.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
ransomwareinsider threatdata breachextortion
MOTIVATION
financial gainpersonal debt (Goldberg)enrichment
IMPACT
Medical Device Company: $1,274,000 (paid ransom)Doctor Office: $5,000,000 (demanded, unpaid)Engineering Company: $1,000,000 (demanded, unpaid)Drone Manufacturer: $300,000 (demanded, unpaid)Pharmaceutical Company: unspecified (demanded, unpaid)potential 50-year federal prison sentencesongoing FBI investigation into DigitalMint employee

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for Boston Scientific ?
?
What was Boston Scientific's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2026 ?
?
What was Boston Scientific's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2026 ?
?
What was Boston Scientific's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2026 ?
?
What was Boston Scientific's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in June 2026 ?
?
What was Boston Scientific's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was Boston Scientific's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was Boston Scientific's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was Boston Scientific's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was Boston Scientific's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was Boston Scientific's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was Boston Scientific's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on Boston Scientific's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with Boston Scientific ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view Boston Scientific's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?