Comparison Overview
Boston Scientific

Boston Scientific
100 Boston Scientific Way, Marlborough, 01752, US
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Boston Scientific transforms lives through innovative medical technologies that improve the health of patients around the world. As a global medical technology leader for more than 40 years, we advance science for life by providing a broad range of high-performance solu...

Zimmer Biomet
345 East Main Street, P.O. Box 708, Warsaw, Indiana, US, 46580
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Zimmer Biomet is a global medical technology leader with a comprehensive portfolio designed to maximize mobility and improve health. We advance our mission to alleviate pain and improve the quality of life for patients around the world with our innovative products and s...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Boston Scientific







Zimmer Biomet






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
Boston Scientific has 25.93% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Zimmer Biomet in 2026.
Incident History - Boston Scientific (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Boston Scientific cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Zimmer Biomet (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Zimmer Biomet cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Boston Scientific

Zimmer Biomet
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Improper access control in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.
A security vulnerability has been detected in NousResearch hermes-agent up to 2026.4.30. Affected is the function GatewayStreamConsumer._filter_and_accumulate of the file gateway/stream_consumer.py of the component Streaming Reasoning Tag Filter. The manipulation leads to improper handling of case sensitivity. The attack may be initiated remotely. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project decided to not implement a dedicated fix: "[T]he analysis and the fix are both sound. It just lands below the bar for the maintenance cost of a duplicated scrub path."
- https://gist.github.com/YLChen-007/2229e5505bcbb3e15a7ae8fba4c4be37
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/27288
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/28631#issuecomment-4622188016
- https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-14617
- https://vuldb.com/submit/844654
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134/cti
Insufficient ui warning of dangerous operations in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Relative path traversal in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally.