Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Bostik | DIYBostik | DIY
VS
dsm-firmenichdsm-firmenich
Bostik | DIY

Bostik | DIY

420, Rue d'Estienne d'Orves, Colombes, 92700, FR

Last Update: 22/02/2026

View Profile

At Bostik, we’ve been attached to your world for over 125 years. We’re a global leader in adhesive and sealant solutions. Our focus is on innovative products that make your daily life a little easier. From our industry-leading Blu Tack®—the world’s favourite reusable ad...

NAICS:325
NAICS Definition:Chemical Manufacturing
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
dsm-firmenich

dsm-firmenich

N/A

Last Update: 16/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.dsm-firmenich.com
799/1000Fair

We are dsm-firmenich – innovators in nutrition, health, and beauty. We bring progress to life by combining the essential, the desirable, and the sustainable. From our master perfumers and flavorists to our expert nutritionists and scientists, our trailblazing teams wo...

NAICS:325
NAICS Definition:Chemical Manufacturing
Employees:27,774
Subsidiaries:18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Bostik | DIY

Bostik | DIY

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
dsm-firmenich

dsm-firmenich

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bostik | DIY in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for dsm-firmenich in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Bostik | DIY (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bostik | DIY cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - dsm-firmenich (X = Date, Y = Severity)

dsm-firmenich cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Bostik | DIY

Bostik | DIY

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
dsm-firmenich

dsm-firmenich

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Bostik | DIY company and dsm-firmenich company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Bostik | DIY company and dsm-firmenich company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Bostik | DIY company and dsm-firmenich company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Bostik | DIY company and dsm-firmenich company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Bostik | DIY company and dsm-firmenich company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Bostik | DIY company and dsm-firmenich company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Bostik | DIY company and dsm-firmenich company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Bostik | DIY company and dsm-firmenich company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Bostik | DIY company and dsm-firmenich company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Bostik | DIY company and dsm-firmenich company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Bostik | DIY company and dsm-firmenich company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Bostik | DIY and dsm-firmenich, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Bostik | DIY and dsm-firmenich, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Bostik | DIY or dsm-firmenich ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Bostik | DIY or dsm-firmenich ?
Between Bostik | DIY and dsm-firmenich, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Bostik | DIY and dsm-firmenich, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2