Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Bostik Benelux B.V.Bostik Benelux B.V.
VS
BrenntagBrenntag
Bostik Benelux B.V.

Bostik Benelux B.V.

Denariusstraat 11, Oosterhout, Noord-Brabant, 4903 RC, NL

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
754/1000Fair

Bostik, adhesive solutions by Arkema Bostik is een toonaangevende wereldwijde specialist in lijm- en afdichtingsoplossingen voor de bouw, industrie en de consumentenmarkt. Al meer dan een eeuw ontwikkelen we innovatieve lijmoplossingen die slimmer zijn en meer aangepas...

NAICS:325
NAICS Definition:Chemical Manufacturing
Employees:226
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Brenntag

Brenntag

Messeallee 11, Essen , 45131, DE

Last Update: 06/09/2026

View Profile
721/1000Moderate

Brenntag is the global market leader in chemicals and ingredients distribution and holds a central role in connecting customers and suppliers of the chemical industry. Headquartered in Essen, Germany, we have more than 18,100 employees worldwide and operate a network of...

NAICS:325
NAICS Definition:Chemical Manufacturing
Employees:11,986
Subsidiaries:19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Bostik Benelux B.V.

Bostik Benelux B.V.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Brenntag

Brenntag

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bostik Benelux B.V. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brenntag in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Bostik Benelux B.V. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bostik Benelux B.V. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Brenntag (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brenntag cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Bostik Benelux B.V.

Bostik Benelux B.V.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Brenntag

Brenntag

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
BRE221211222
🔒 Incident : Breach
BRE414072825

FAQ

Between Bostik Benelux B.V. company and Brenntag company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Bostik Benelux B.V. company and Brenntag company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Bostik Benelux B.V. company and Brenntag company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Bostik Benelux B.V. company and Brenntag company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Bostik Benelux B.V. company and Brenntag company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Bostik Benelux B.V. company and Brenntag company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Bostik Benelux B.V. company and Brenntag company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Bostik Benelux B.V. company and Brenntag company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Bostik Benelux B.V. company and Brenntag company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Bostik Benelux B.V. company and Brenntag company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Bostik Benelux B.V. company and Brenntag company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Bostik Benelux B.V. and Brenntag, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Bostik Benelux B.V. and Brenntag, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Bostik Benelux B.V. or Brenntag ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Bostik Benelux B.V. or Brenntag ?
Between Bostik Benelux B.V. and Brenntag, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Bostik Benelux B.V. and Brenntag, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8