Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Boskalis SubseaBoskalis Subsea
VS
PETRONASPETRONAS
Boskalis Subsea

Boskalis Subsea

Rosmolenweg 20, Papendrecht, 3356, NL

Last Update: 18/03/2026

View Profile
750/1000Fair

Boskalis Subsea Cables & Flexibles (previously VBMS) specialises in subsea power cable installation, Balance of Plant maintenance for the renewables market, and umbilical/flowline installation for the oil & gas markets and installation of interconnectors. The company de...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
PETRONAS

PETRONAS

Kuala Lumpur, 50088, MY

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
801/1000Good

Petroliam Nasional Berhad (PETRONAS) is a leading global energy company committed to powering society’s progress in a responsible and sustainable manner. With close to 50,000 employees and a global reach spanning over 100 countries, we are ranked among the world’s large...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:39,979
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Boskalis Subsea

Boskalis Subsea

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
PETRONAS

PETRONAS

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Boskalis Subsea in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PETRONAS in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Boskalis Subsea (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Boskalis Subsea cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - PETRONAS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PETRONAS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Boskalis Subsea

Boskalis Subsea

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
PETRONAS

PETRONAS

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Boskalis Subsea company and PETRONAS company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Boskalis Subsea company and PETRONAS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Boskalis Subsea company and PETRONAS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Boskalis Subsea company and PETRONAS company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Boskalis Subsea company and PETRONAS company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Boskalis Subsea company and PETRONAS company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Boskalis Subsea company and PETRONAS company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Boskalis Subsea company and PETRONAS company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Boskalis Subsea company and PETRONAS company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Boskalis Subsea company and PETRONAS company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Boskalis Subsea company and PETRONAS company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Boskalis Subsea and PETRONAS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Boskalis Subsea and PETRONAS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Boskalis Subsea or PETRONAS ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Boskalis Subsea or PETRONAS ?
Between Boskalis Subsea and PETRONAS, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Boskalis Subsea and PETRONAS, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9