Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Boskalis NederlandBoskalis Nederland
VS
Mott MacDonaldMott MacDonald
Boskalis Nederland

Boskalis Nederland

Rosmolenweg 2, Papendrecht, 3356 LK, NL

Last Update: 16/03/2026

View Profile
761/1000Fair

Boskalis Nederland is als onderdeel van Koninklijke Boskalis Westminster N.V. de business unit die actief is op de Nederlandse markt. We treden op als aannemer van omvangrijke en complexe projecten of als partner in Design & Construct opdrachten. We participeren in publ...

NAICS:237
NAICS Definition:Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees:905
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Mott MacDonald

Mott MacDonald

10 Fleet Place, London, EC4M 7, GB

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://mottmac.com
800/1000Good

We are an engineering, management and development consultancy and one of the largest wholly employee-owned firms of our kind. We plan, design, deliver and maintain the transport, energy, water, defence and security, and buildings infrastructure that is integral to peo...

NAICS:237
NAICS Definition:Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees:24,383
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Boskalis Nederland

Boskalis Nederland

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Mott MacDonald

Mott MacDonald

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Boskalis Nederland in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mott MacDonald in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Boskalis Nederland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Boskalis Nederland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Mott MacDonald (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mott MacDonald cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Boskalis Nederland

Boskalis Nederland

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Mott MacDonald

Mott MacDonald

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Boskalis Nederland company and Mott MacDonald company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Boskalis Nederland company and Mott MacDonald company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Boskalis Nederland company and Mott MacDonald company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Boskalis Nederland company and Mott MacDonald company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Boskalis Nederland company and Mott MacDonald company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Boskalis Nederland company and Mott MacDonald company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Boskalis Nederland company and Mott MacDonald company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Boskalis Nederland company and Mott MacDonald company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Boskalis Nederland company and Mott MacDonald company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Boskalis Nederland company and Mott MacDonald company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Boskalis Nederland company and Mott MacDonald company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Boskalis Nederland and Mott MacDonald, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Boskalis Nederland and Mott MacDonald, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Boskalis Nederland or Mott MacDonald ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Boskalis Nederland or Mott MacDonald ?
Between Boskalis Nederland and Mott MacDonald, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Boskalis Nederland and Mott MacDonald, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA