Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Boskalis NederlandBoskalis Nederland
VS
EpirocEpiroc
Boskalis Nederland

Boskalis Nederland

Rosmolenweg 2, Papendrecht, 3356 LK, NL

Last Update: 16/03/2026

View Profile
761/1000Fair

Boskalis Nederland is als onderdeel van Koninklijke Boskalis Westminster N.V. de business unit die actief is op de Nederlandse markt. We treden op als aannemer van omvangrijke en complexe projecten of als partner in Design & Construct opdrachten. We participeren in publ...

NAICS:237
NAICS Definition:Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees:905
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Epiroc

Epiroc

Sickla Industriväg 19, Nacka, Stockholm, SE, 131 54

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.epiroc.com
806/1000Good

Performance to succeed today. Technology to lead tomorrow. Epiroc is your partner for mining and infrastructure equipment. We're excited to build on proven expertise and performance with the same people and a bold new drive to make what's good even better. Just lik...

NAICS:237
NAICS Definition:Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees:12,558
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Boskalis Nederland

Boskalis Nederland

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Epiroc

Epiroc

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Boskalis Nederland in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Epiroc in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Boskalis Nederland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Boskalis Nederland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Epiroc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Epiroc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Boskalis Nederland

Boskalis Nederland

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Epiroc

Epiroc

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Boskalis Nederland company and Epiroc company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Boskalis Nederland company and Epiroc company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Boskalis Nederland company and Epiroc company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Boskalis Nederland company and Epiroc company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Boskalis Nederland company and Epiroc company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Boskalis Nederland company and Epiroc company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Boskalis Nederland company and Epiroc company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Boskalis Nederland company and Epiroc company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Boskalis Nederland company and Epiroc company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Boskalis Nederland company and Epiroc company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Boskalis Nederland company and Epiroc company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Boskalis Nederland and Epiroc, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Boskalis Nederland and Epiroc, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Boskalis Nederland or Epiroc ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Boskalis Nederland or Epiroc ?
Between Boskalis Nederland and Epiroc, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Boskalis Nederland and Epiroc, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9