Comparison Overview
Boskalis Nederland

Boskalis Nederland
Rosmolenweg 2, Papendrecht, 3356 LK, NL
Last Update: 16/03/2026
Boskalis Nederland is als onderdeel van Koninklijke Boskalis Westminster N.V. de business unit die actief is op de Nederlandse markt. We treden op als aannemer van omvangrijke en complexe projecten of als partner in Design & Construct opdrachten. We participeren in publ...

AECOM
13355 Noel Road, Suite 400, Dallas, Texas, US, 75240
Last Update: 01/04/2026
AECOM is the global infrastructure leader, committed to delivering a better world. As a trusted professional services firm powered by deep technical abilities, we solve our clients’ complex challenges in water, environment, energy, transportation and buildings. Our team...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Boskalis Nederland







AECOM






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Boskalis Nederland in 2026.
Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for AECOM in 2026.
Incident History - Boskalis Nederland (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Boskalis Nederland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - AECOM (X = Date, Y = Severity)
AECOM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Boskalis Nederland

AECOM
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.