Comparison Overview
Bosch Switzerland

Bosch Switzerland
Luterbachstrasse 10, Solothurn, 4528, CH
Last Update: 07/03/2026
The first Bosch products were sold in Switzerland as far back as 1904. The first Bosch company Robert Bosch AG was founded in 1920. The Bosch Group is now represented in Switzerland by seven companies: Robert Bosch AG, Scintilla AG, Bosch Rexroth Schweiz AG, Bosch Therm...

Booking.com
Oosterdokskade 163, Amsterdam, 1011 DL, NL
Last Update: 13/09/2026
A career at Booking.com is all about the journey, helping you explore new challenges in a place where you can be your best self. With plenty of exciting twists, turns and opportunities along the way. We’ve always been pioneers, on a mission to shape the future of trav...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Bosch Switzerland







Booking.com






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Bosch Switzerland in 2026.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
Booking.com has 288.35% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Bosch Switzerland (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Bosch Switzerland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Booking.com (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Booking.com cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Bosch Switzerland

Booking.com
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. Affected is the function formWlEncrypt of the file /boafrm/formWlEncrypt. The manipulation of the argument submit-url leads to buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.
A vulnerability was determined in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This impacts the function formWlAc of the file /boafrm/formWlAc. Executing a manipulation of the argument submit-url can lead to buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
A flaw was found in the OpenShift console. Unauthenticated access to the `/api/devfile/` and `/api/devfile/samples/` endpoints allows a remote attacker to send crafted devfile payloads. This can lead to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), where the console pod makes requests to internal services and reflects partial responses to the attacker. Additionally, by sending repeated large requests without a specified content length, an attacker can cause unbounded memory growth, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS).
In Vinyl Cache before 9.0,2, workspace buffer overflow vulnerability was found in the .upper() and .lower() string type methods of VCL. This can be used as a remote denial of service (DoS) vector to make the child process segfault or assert, and then restart. Effectively exploiting this vulnerability requires prior knowledge about the VCL in use and the ability to craft a request that contains a string that is long enough to fill the remaining workspace at the call site while staying under the different request size limits (http_req_size, http_req_hdr_len, etc.).
A vulnerability was found in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This affects the function formSchedule of the file /boafrm/formSchedule. Performing a manipulation of the argument webpage results in buffer overflow. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.