Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Bosch Australia Manufacturing Solutions (BAMS)Bosch Australia Manufacturing Solutions (BAMS)
VS
Flowserve CorporationFlowserve Corporation
Bosch Australia Manufacturing Solutions (BAMS)

Bosch Australia Manufacturing Solutions (BAMS)

1555 Centre Rd, Clayton, 3168, AU

Last Update: 29/01/2026

View Profile
747/1000Moderate

Leveraging Bosch's 140 years of global innovation, Bosch Australia Manufacturing Solutions (BAMS) offers a comprehensive suite of manufacturing solutions: 1. Robotics and Automation for custom design and delivery of automated production equipment and lines; 2. Manufa...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:81
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Flowserve Corporation

Flowserve Corporation

5215 N. O'Connor Blvd., Irving, 75039, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.flowserve.com
777/1000Fair

Flowserve is one of the world's largest manufacturers of pumps, valves and seals with over 16,000 employees across 50 countries. Built on more than 50 world-renowned heritage brands, the equity and customer loyalty we have earned over the past 230 years is the foundatio...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:14,596
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Bosch Australia Manufacturing Solutions (BAMS)

Bosch Australia Manufacturing Solutions (BAMS)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Flowserve Corporation

Flowserve Corporation

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bosch Australia Manufacturing Solutions (BAMS) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Flowserve Corporation in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Bosch Australia Manufacturing Solutions (BAMS) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bosch Australia Manufacturing Solutions (BAMS) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Flowserve Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Flowserve Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Bosch Australia Manufacturing Solutions (BAMS)

Bosch Australia Manufacturing Solutions (BAMS)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Flowserve Corporation

Flowserve Corporation

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Bosch Australia Manufacturing Solutions (BAMS) company and Flowserve Corporation company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Bosch Australia Manufacturing Solutions (BAMS) company and Flowserve Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Bosch Australia Manufacturing Solutions (BAMS) company and Flowserve Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Bosch Australia Manufacturing Solutions (BAMS) company and Flowserve Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Bosch Australia Manufacturing Solutions (BAMS) company and Flowserve Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Bosch Australia Manufacturing Solutions (BAMS) company and Flowserve Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Bosch Australia Manufacturing Solutions (BAMS) company and Flowserve Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Bosch Australia Manufacturing Solutions (BAMS) company and Flowserve Corporation company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Bosch Australia Manufacturing Solutions (BAMS) company and Flowserve Corporation company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Bosch Australia Manufacturing Solutions (BAMS) company and Flowserve Corporation company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Bosch Australia Manufacturing Solutions (BAMS) company and Flowserve Corporation company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Bosch Australia Manufacturing Solutions (BAMS) and Flowserve Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Bosch Australia Manufacturing Solutions (BAMS) and Flowserve Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Bosch Australia Manufacturing Solutions (BAMS) or Flowserve Corporation ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Bosch Australia Manufacturing Solutions (BAMS) or Flowserve Corporation ?
Between Bosch Australia Manufacturing Solutions (BAMS) and Flowserve Corporation, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Bosch Australia Manufacturing Solutions (BAMS) and Flowserve Corporation, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-71194
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Designate before 22.0.2, the mDNS handler performs pool-blind lookups when resolving record queries and NOTIFY requests. When two zones with the same name exist across different pools, the lookup fails with a deterministic error, causing the handler to return REFUSED for all DNS queries through that path. The _handle_notify path is exploitable via a single unauthenticated UDP packet. This is independently reachable through the cross-tenant zone overlap described in a different recent CVE, and also affects legitimate same-tenant cross-pool configurations. BIND9 views do not mitigate this issue as mDNS is a shared service upstream of any view configuration.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-71193
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Designate before 22.0.1, zone creation checks (_is_subzone, _is_superzone, and the duplicate-zone DB constraint) are scoped to the target pool only. An authenticated user can bypass these checks by scheduling a zone to a different pool via the AttributeFilter scheduler, creating an overlapping zone that conflicts with another tenant's zone. This enables cross-tenant DNS hijack (redirecting traffic to attacker-controlled IPs) and DNS denial of service (NODATA responses). Exploitation requires a multi-pool deployment with AttributeFilter enabled in scheduler_filters, which is a non-default but documented and supported configuration for self-service tiering.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-49481
SUMMARY

UpSnap is a wake on lan web app. Versions prior to 5.4.0 have an OS command injection vulnerability in the UpSnap’s device management functionality due to the presence of unsafe shell command template interpolation using the ip and the mac fields. User-controlled values can be inserted into the wake_cmd and shutdown_cmd templates and executed via /bin/sh -c (Linux) or cmd /C (Windows) without sanitization, resulting in an authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE). A low-privileged user with permission to create or edit devices can execute arbitrary operating system commands on the UpSnap hosted server. Version 5.4.0 patches the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-47718
SUMMARY

FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. When `secureEnabled=true`, FUXA `1.3.0-2773` still allows guest and invalid-token requests to read project, alarms, and scheduler APIs. Version 1.3.1 fixes this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-47717
SUMMARY

FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. In fuxa-server version 1.3.0, the GET /api/project endpoint exposes sensitive project configuration data to guest-context requests even when secureEnabled is enabled. Version 1.3.1 fixes the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9