Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Bosch PortugalBosch Portugal
VS
AtlassianAtlassian
Bosch Portugal

Bosch Portugal

Av. Infante D. Henrique, Lote 2E-3E, Lisboa, 1800-220 Lisboa, PT

Last Update: 22/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bosch.pt/
765/1000Fair

Como empresa líder na Internet das Coisas, a Bosch oferece soluções inovadoras para as casas e cidades inteligentes, e para a indústria e mobilidade conectadas. O nosso objetivo? Criar soluções para uma vida conectada e melhorar a qualidade de vida das pessoas através d...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:1,569
Subsidiaries:82
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Atlassian

Atlassian

Level 6/341 George St, Sydney, 2000, AU

Last Update: 06/10/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://atlassian.com/
754/1000Fair

Atlassian powers the collaboration that helps teams accomplish what would otherwise be impossible alone. From space missions and motor racing to bugs in code and IT requests, no task is too large or too small with the right team, the right tools, and the right practice...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:16,931
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
6
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Bosch Portugal

Bosch Portugal

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Atlassian

Atlassian

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bosch Portugal in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Atlassian has 494.06% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Bosch Portugal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bosch Portugal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Atlassian (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atlassian cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Bosch Portugal

Bosch Portugal

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Atlassian

Atlassian

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
ATL1791296955
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
ATL1786359965
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
ATL1C-1789741437

FAQ

Between Bosch Portugal company and Atlassian company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Bosch Portugal company and Atlassian company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Bosch Portugal company and Atlassian company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Bosch Portugal company and Atlassian company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Bosch Portugal company and Atlassian company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Bosch Portugal company and Atlassian company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Bosch Portugal company and Atlassian company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Bosch Portugal company and Atlassian company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Bosch Portugal company and Atlassian company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Bosch Portugal company and Atlassian company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Bosch Portugal company and Atlassian company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Bosch Portugal and Atlassian, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Bosch Portugal and Atlassian, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Bosch Portugal or Atlassian ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Bosch Portugal or Atlassian ?
Between Bosch Portugal and Atlassian, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Bosch Portugal and Atlassian, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA