Comparison Overview
Bosch Digital Bulgaria

Bosch Digital Bulgaria
bul. Tsarigradsko shose 47 B , Sofia, BG
Last Update: 10/03/2026
We are Bosch Digital and we drive IT and digital business within Bosch. What we do We are the digital pioneers within Bosch. Our competitive portfolio, deep understanding of Bosch needs, and long-standing expertise make us the go-to destination for accelerating IT and...

AlmavivA Experience
Avenida Rebouças 2728, São Paulo, 05402-500, BR
Last Update: 03/04/2026
Líder em transformação digital nos mercados de Customer Experience e Debt Collection na América Latina. Combinamos tecnologia, inteligência e excelência operacional para entregar soluções completas que antecipam as necessidades dos nossos Clientes. São mais de 530 mil...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Bosch Digital Bulgaria







AlmavivA Experience






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Bosch Digital Bulgaria in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for AlmavivA Experience in 2026.
Incident History - Bosch Digital Bulgaria (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Bosch Digital Bulgaria cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - AlmavivA Experience (X = Date, Y = Severity)
AlmavivA Experience cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Bosch Digital Bulgaria

AlmavivA Experience
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.