Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Border States Industrial SolutionsBorder States Industrial Solutions
VS
FastenalFastenal
Border States Industrial Solutions

Border States Industrial Solutions

N/A

Last Update: 06/03/2026

View Profile

At Border States, we understand the unstoppable momentum that drives industrial and manufacturing companies forward. With more than 70 years in business, our expertise goes beyond being a supplier. We are your allies in ensuring your operations run without interruption,...

NAICS:42
NAICS Definition:Wholesale Trade
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Fastenal

Fastenal

2001 Theurer Blvd, Winona, MN, US, 55987

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.fastenal.com
774/1000Fair

By providing three things – truly local service, the world’s largest vending program, and unmatched inventory management – Fastenal saves your business time and money. Who are Fastenal's customers? • Organizations wanting to strengthen their supply chains. • Business...

NAICS:42
NAICS Definition:Wholesale Trade
Employees:18,216
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Border States Industrial Solutions

Border States Industrial Solutions

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Fastenal

Fastenal

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Wholesale Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Border States Industrial Solutions in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Wholesale Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fastenal in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Border States Industrial Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Border States Industrial Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Fastenal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fastenal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Border States Industrial Solutions

Border States Industrial Solutions

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Fastenal

Fastenal

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Border States Industrial Solutions company and Fastenal company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Border States Industrial Solutions company and Fastenal company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Border States Industrial Solutions company and Fastenal company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Border States Industrial Solutions company and Fastenal company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Border States Industrial Solutions company and Fastenal company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Border States Industrial Solutions company and Fastenal company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Border States Industrial Solutions company and Fastenal company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Border States Industrial Solutions company and Fastenal company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Border States Industrial Solutions company and Fastenal company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Border States Industrial Solutions company and Fastenal company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Border States Industrial Solutions company and Fastenal company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Border States Industrial Solutions and Fastenal, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Border States Industrial Solutions and Fastenal, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Border States Industrial Solutions or Fastenal ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Border States Industrial Solutions or Fastenal ?
Between Border States Industrial Solutions and Fastenal, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Border States Industrial Solutions and Fastenal, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8