Comparison Overview

Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG)

VS

Avnet

Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG)

800 Connecticut Avenue, Norwalk, CT, 06854, US
Last Update: 2025-11-20

Booking Holdings is the world’s leading provider of online travel & related services, provided to consumers and local partners in more than 220 countries and territories through six primary consumer-facing brands: Booking.com, Priceline, Agoda, Rentalcars.com, KAYAK and OpenTable. Collectively, Booking Holdings operates in more than 40 languages across Europe, North America, South America, the Asia-Pacific region, the Middle East and Africa. The mission of Booking Holdings is to make it easier for everyone to experience the world.

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 16,824
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Avnet

2211 South 47th Street, Phoenix, AZ, US, 85034
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

Avnet is a global electronic components distributor with extensive design, product, marketing and supply chain expertise for customers and suppliers at every stage of the product lifecycle. For the past 100 years, Avnet has helped its customers and suppliers around the world realize the transformative possibilities of technology. Our culture was founded on new ideas and emerging technology. Headquartered in Phoenix, Arizona, Avnet is a leading global technology distributor and solutions provider at the center of the technology value chain. Founded in 1921, we work with suppliers in every major technology segment to serve customers worldwide across a broad range of markets. Whether working on large-scale production or early prototypes, we meet customer needs through individualized, end-to-end service to streamline solutions and improve efficiency for customers worldwide. Headquartered in Phoenix, Arizona, we serve more than 1 million customers in more than 140 countries and partner with global suppliers from almost every technology segment. Learn more about Avnet at www.avnet.com.

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 11,239
Subsidiaries: 14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bookingholdings.jpeg
Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/avnet.jpeg
Avnet
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Avnet
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG) in 2025.

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Avnet in 2025.

Incident History — Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Avnet (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Avnet cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bookingholdings.jpeg
Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG)
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Mass-phishing, Infostealer trojans
Motivation: Financial gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: compromised email accounts, phishing links, fake reCAPTCHA challenge, malware download (PureRAT), personalized WhatsApp messages, fake Booking/Expedia websites
Motivation: financial gain, data theft, fraudulent transactions
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: malicious domain registration, social engineering, phishing emails/websites
Motivation: financial gain, theft of payment details
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/avnet.jpeg
Avnet
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Avnet company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG) company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Avnet company has not reported any.

In the current year, Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG) company has reported more cyber incidents than Avnet company.

Neither Avnet company nor Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Avnet company nor Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG) company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Avnet company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG) company nor Avnet company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG) nor Avnet holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Avnet company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG) company.

Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG) company employs more people globally than Avnet company, reflecting its scale as a Technology, Information and Internet.

Neither Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG) nor Avnet holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG) nor Avnet holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG) nor Avnet holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG) nor Avnet holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG) nor Avnet holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG) nor Avnet holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H