Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Bonefish GrillBonefish Grill
VS
Chick-fil-A Corporate Support CenterChick-fil-A Corporate Support Center
Bonefish Grill

Bonefish Grill

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US

Last Update: 17/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://bonefishgrill.com
771/1000Fair

Since the first Bonefish Grill anchored in St. Petersburg, Florida in the year 2000, we’ve expanded our net nationwide to share our deep passion for fresh seafood. Our founders set out to create a truly unique, explorative, and memorable dining experience. At Bonefis...

NAICS:7225
NAICS Definition:Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees:3,908
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center

Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center

5200 Buffington Road, Atlanta, 30349, US

Last Update: 28/07/2026

View Profile
506/1000Critical

At its Atlanta headquarters, known as the Corporate Support Center, Chick-fil-A, Inc. offers full-time careers in various fields such as Digital Transformation & Technology, Financial Services & Accounting, Enterprise Analytics, Restaurant Development, Early Talent Prog...

NAICS:7225
NAICS Definition:Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees:92,373
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
5
Known data breaches
7
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Bonefish Grill

Bonefish Grill

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center

Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bonefish Grill in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)

Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center has 385.44% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Bonefish Grill (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bonefish Grill cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Bonefish Grill

Bonefish Grill

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center

Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
CHI1785205686
🔒 Incident : Breach
CHI1784708960
🔒 Incident : Breach
CHI1784737860

FAQ

Between Bonefish Grill company and Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Bonefish Grill company and Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Bonefish Grill company and Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Bonefish Grill company and Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Bonefish Grill company and Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Bonefish Grill company and Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Bonefish Grill company and Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Bonefish Grill company and Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Bonefish Grill company and Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Bonefish Grill company and Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Bonefish Grill company and Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Bonefish Grill and Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Bonefish Grill and Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Bonefish Grill or Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Bonefish Grill or Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center ?
Between Bonefish Grill and Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Bonefish Grill and Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9044
SUMMARY

An OS command injection vulnerability exists in the VPN module of TP-Link AXE75 V1 routers. This vulnerability allows an adjacent, authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the device by importing a specially crafted VPN client configuration file. The issue arises from improper filtering of special characters.  Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may enable an attacker to gain full control of the affected device, potentially compromising configuration integrity, network security, and service availability.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-54909
SUMMARY

pion/stun is a Go implementation of STUN. Prior to 3.1.3, XORMappedAddress.GetFromAs can panic while parsing a malformed short XOR-MAPPED-ADDRESS attribute in STUN or ICE Binding-response parsing paths, allowing remote denial of service. This issue is fixed in version 3.1.3.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54785
SUMMARY

gemini-bridge is a lightweight MCP server bridging AI agents to Google's Gemini AI via the official CLI. From 1.0.0 until 1.3.1, consult_gemini_with_files in inline mode read any file path supplied in the files argument without confining it to the working directory, then forwarded the contents to the Gemini CLI. Because the caller also controls query, the file contents are echoed back through the Gemini round-trip (and sent to Google), making this an arbitrary local file read. This issue is fixed in version 1.3.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-54768
SUMMARY

WPGraphQL provides a GraphQL API for WordPress sites. From 2.0.0 until 2.15.1, the deprecated user field on SendPasswordResetEmailPayload lets an unauthenticated caller distinguish existing author-class accounts through the sendPasswordResetEmail mutation and obtain public profile fields. This issue is fixed in version 2.15.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-53573
SUMMARY

GeoNetwork is a catalog application to manage spatially referenced resources. From 3.12.0 until 4.2.16 and 4.4.11, unsafe redirect validation in GeonetworkOAuth2LoginAuthenticationFilter and KeycloakAuthenticationProcessingFilter permits an attacker-controlled external redirect after login. This issue is fixed in versions 4.2.16 and 4.4.11.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 4.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA