Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Bon SecoursBon Secours
VS
Rochester Regional HealthRochester Regional Health
Bon Secours

Bon Secours

1505 Marriottsville Road, Marriottsville, 21104, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bonsecours.com
759/1000Fair

Bon Secours Health System, Inc. based in Marriottsville, Maryland, is a $3.2 billion dollar not-for-profit Catholic health system that owns, manages or joint ventures 18 acute care, 5 long term care, 4 assisted living, 6 retirement communities/senior housing, 14 home ca...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:10,337
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
Rochester Regional Health

Rochester Regional Health

100 S Kings Hwy, Rochester, New York, US, 14617

Last Update: 16/06/2026

View Profile
674/1000Weak

Rochester Regional Health, headquartered in Rochester, NY, is an integrated health services organization serving the people of Western New York, the Finger Lakes, St. Lawrence County, and beyond. We are dedicated to helping our community stay healthy and live fulfilling...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:11,135
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Bon Secours

Bon Secours

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Rochester Regional Health

Rochester Regional Health

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bon Secours in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

Rochester Regional Health has 3.85% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Bon Secours (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bon Secours cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Rochester Regional Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rochester Regional Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Bon Secours

Bon Secours

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
BON341622
🔒 Incident : Breach
BON158082125
Rochester Regional Health

Rochester Regional Health

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ROCXSO1781563504
🔒 Incident : Breach
ROCXSO1781634267

FAQ

Between Bon Secours company and Rochester Regional Health company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Bon Secours company and Rochester Regional Health company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Bon Secours company and Rochester Regional Health company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Bon Secours company and Rochester Regional Health company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Bon Secours company and Rochester Regional Health company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Bon Secours company and Rochester Regional Health company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Bon Secours company and Rochester Regional Health company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Bon Secours company and Rochester Regional Health company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Bon Secours company and Rochester Regional Health company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Bon Secours company and Rochester Regional Health company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Bon Secours company and Rochester Regional Health company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Bon Secours and Rochester Regional Health, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Bon Secours and Rochester Regional Health, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Bon Secours or Rochester Regional Health ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Bon Secours or Rochester Regional Health ?
Between Bon Secours and Rochester Regional Health, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Bon Secours and Rochester Regional Health, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1