Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Bon Appétit Management CompanyBon Appétit Management Company
VS
Panda Restaurant GroupPanda Restaurant Group
Bon Appétit Management Company

Bon Appétit Management Company

201 Redwood Shores Parkway, Suite 175, Redwood City, 94065, US

Last Update: 21/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bamco.com
774/1000Fair

Bon Appétit Management Company (www.bamco.com) is an on-site restaurant company offering full food-service management to corporations, universities, and specialty venues. Based in Redwood City, CA, Bon Appétit has more than 1,000 cafés in 33 states, including ones for G...

NAICS:7225
NAICS Definition:Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees:4,204
Subsidiaries:23
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Panda Restaurant Group

Panda Restaurant Group

1683 Walnut Grove Ave, Rosemead, 91770, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://PandaCareers.com
707/1000Moderate

Panda Restaurant Group is the global leader in Asian dining and includes Panda Express, Panda Inn, and more. Founded in 1973 by Andrew and Peggy Cherng, we are a family-owned business with more than 2,600 restaurants worldwide. Our mission is to deliver exceptional Asia...

NAICS:7225
NAICS Definition:Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees:17,796
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Bon Appétit Management Company

Bon Appétit Management Company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Panda Restaurant Group

Panda Restaurant Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bon Appétit Management Company in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Panda Restaurant Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Bon Appétit Management Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bon Appétit Management Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Panda Restaurant Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Panda Restaurant Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Bon Appétit Management Company

Bon Appétit Management Company

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Panda Restaurant Group

Panda Restaurant Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
PAN012080525
🔒 Incident : Breach
PANELP1770733073

FAQ

Between Bon Appétit Management Company company and Panda Restaurant Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Bon Appétit Management Company company and Panda Restaurant Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Bon Appétit Management Company company and Panda Restaurant Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Bon Appétit Management Company company and Panda Restaurant Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Bon Appétit Management Company company and Panda Restaurant Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Bon Appétit Management Company company and Panda Restaurant Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Bon Appétit Management Company company and Panda Restaurant Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Bon Appétit Management Company company and Panda Restaurant Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Bon Appétit Management Company company and Panda Restaurant Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Bon Appétit Management Company company and Panda Restaurant Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Bon Appétit Management Company company and Panda Restaurant Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Bon Appétit Management Company and Panda Restaurant Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Bon Appétit Management Company and Panda Restaurant Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Bon Appétit Management Company or Panda Restaurant Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Bon Appétit Management Company or Panda Restaurant Group ?
Between Bon Appétit Management Company and Panda Restaurant Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Bon Appétit Management Company and Panda Restaurant Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-44654
SUMMARY

LibreChat is an enhanced ChatGPT clone that supports multiple AI providers. In versions up to and including 0.8.3, a shared-agent editor can delete file records through `DELETE /api/files` that the owner has reused across multiple agents. The deletion removes the file globally — not just from the shared agent — breaking the owner's other private agents that reference the same `file_id`. The private agent retains a stale `file_id` reference that no longer resolves. A shared-agent editor can destroy files that the owner uses across multiple agents. The owner's private agents — which the attacker has no access to — break silently with stale `file_id` references. This is a cross-agent integrity violation: editing access to one agent should not affect another. Version 0.8.4 contains a patch.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-44653
SUMMARY

LibreChat is an enhanced ChatGPT clone that supports multiple AI providers. In versions up to and including 0.8.3, users with only `VIEW` access to an MCP server can retrieve the server's decrypted admin-managed secrets through `GET /api/mcp/servers` and `GET /api/mcp/servers/:serverName`. The returned config includes plaintext values for `apiKey.key` and `oauth.client_secret`. This allows viewers of a shared MCP server to exfiltrate the underlying provider credentials. Version 0.8..4 contains a patch. Other remediations include: never returning decrypted admin-managed secrets to non-owners; redacting apiKey.key and oauth.client_secret from all API responses consider returning only boolean presence indicators for secrets, similar to the auth-values route pattern; and, if owners need to edit configs without re-entering secrets, preserving secrets server-side and returning placeholders instead of plaintext.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-42507
SUMMARY

When returning errors, functions in the net/textproto package would include its input as part of the error. This might allow an attacker to inject misleading content to errors that are printed or logged.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-42504
SUMMARY

Decoding a maliciously-crafted MIME header containing many invalid encoded-words can consume excessive CPU.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-41412
SUMMARY

alf.io is an open source ticket reservation system for conferences, trade shows, workshops, and meetups. Prior to version 2.0-M5-2606, the alf.io extension sandbox injects a fully-functional HTTP client (`simpleHttpClient`) into every extension script's scope. The `postFileAndSaveResponse()` method accepts an arbitrary filesystem path as its `file` parameter and reads the file contents using `new FileInputStream(file)` with no path validation, directory restriction, or allowlist. A malicious extension script can read any file accessible to the JVM process user and exfiltrate it to an attacker-controlled server via HTTP POST. Version 2.0-M5-2606 patches the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2