Comparison Overview

Bologna Airport

VS

Lufthansa Group

Bologna Airport

Via del Triumvirato, 84, None, Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, IT, 40132
Last Update: 2025-12-12

We are an international airport classified as a "strategic airport" for the Central-North area in the National Airport Plan drawn up by the Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport. In 2024, we welcomed 10.8 million passengers, ranking as the seventh busiest airport in Italy by passenger numbers (Source: Assaeroporti – Airports 2030). Located in the heart of the Emilia food valley and the industrial districts of automotive and packaging, we serve a catchment area of approximately 11 million inhabitants and 47,000 companies with a strong inclination towards export and internationalization, and commercial expansion policies towards Eastern Europe and Asia. Regarding airport infrastructure, among our strategic objectives for the coming years, we have an important development plan focused primarily on expanding the passenger terminal, particularly in the security control and boarding gate areas. Our goal is to become one of the most modern and functional airport terminals in Italy, serving as a significant gateway to the city and the region. We are a dynamic, continuously developing organization, capable of ensuring those who collaborate with us the opportunity to fully express their potential while safeguarding their well-being. We care for the people who work with us and are constantly seeking talented individuals who wish to join our team and share in our challenges and successes. Together, we aim to make a difference and soar to even greater heights.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 315
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Lufthansa Group

Airportring, Frankfurt, -, 60546, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

The Lufthansa Group is an aviation company with operations worldwide. It plays a leading role in its European home market. With 109,509 employees, the Lufthansa Group generated revenue of EUR 32.770m in the financial year 2022. The Passenger Airlines segment includes, on the one hand, the network airlines Lufthansa German Airlines, SWISS, Austrian Airlines and Brussels Airlines. As part of the multihub strategy, they offer their passengers a broad range of flights from their global hubs in Frankfurt, Munich and Zurich as well as their national hubs in Vienna and Brussels. Lufthansa German Airlines also includes the regional airlines Lufthansa CityLine, Air Dolomiti and Eurowings Discover, the Lufthansa Group’s holiday airline. Besides the network airlines, Eurowings also belongs to the Passenger Airlines segment. This airline provides a comprehensive range of point-to-point connections for European short-haul destinations, in particular from German-speaking countries. Besides its Passenger Airlines business segment, the Lufthansa Group also comprises aviation services. This includes the Logistics, MRO and Catering segments in particular. The Lufthansa Group also includes the Additional Businesses and Group Functions. These comprise Lufthansa Aviation Training and Lufthansa Systems especially.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 54,173
Subsidiaries: 49
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bolognaairport.jpeg
Bologna Airport
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lufthansa-group.jpeg
Lufthansa Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bologna Airport
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lufthansa Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bologna Airport in 2025.

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lufthansa Group in 2025.

Incident History — Bologna Airport (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bologna Airport cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lufthansa Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lufthansa Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bolognaairport.jpeg
Bologna Airport
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lufthansa-group.jpeg
Lufthansa Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lufthansa Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bologna Airport company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Lufthansa Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bologna Airport company.

In the current year, Lufthansa Group company and Bologna Airport company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lufthansa Group company nor Bologna Airport company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lufthansa Group company nor Bologna Airport company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lufthansa Group company nor Bologna Airport company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bologna Airport company nor Lufthansa Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bologna Airport nor Lufthansa Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Lufthansa Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Bologna Airport company.

Lufthansa Group company employs more people globally than Bologna Airport company, reflecting its scale as a Airlines and Aviation.

Neither Bologna Airport nor Lufthansa Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bologna Airport nor Lufthansa Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bologna Airport nor Lufthansa Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bologna Airport nor Lufthansa Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bologna Airport nor Lufthansa Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bologna Airport nor Lufthansa Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N