Comparison Overview

Bologna Airport

VS

China Eastern Airlines, North America

Bologna Airport

Via del Triumvirato, 84, None, Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, IT, 40132
Last Update: 2025-11-27

We are an international airport classified as a "strategic airport" for the Central-North area in the National Airport Plan drawn up by the Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport. In 2024, we welcomed 10.8 million passengers, ranking as the seventh busiest airport in Italy by passenger numbers (Source: Assaeroporti – Airports 2030). Located in the heart of the Emilia food valley and the industrial districts of automotive and packaging, we serve a catchment area of approximately 11 million inhabitants and 47,000 companies with a strong inclination towards export and internationalization, and commercial expansion policies towards Eastern Europe and Asia. Regarding airport infrastructure, among our strategic objectives for the coming years, we have an important development plan focused primarily on expanding the passenger terminal, particularly in the security control and boarding gate areas. Our goal is to become one of the most modern and functional airport terminals in Italy, serving as a significant gateway to the city and the region. We are a dynamic, continuously developing organization, capable of ensuring those who collaborate with us the opportunity to fully express their potential while safeguarding their well-being. We care for the people who work with us and are constantly seeking talented individuals who wish to join our team and share in our challenges and successes. Together, we aim to make a difference and soar to even greater heights.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 315
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

China Eastern Airlines, North America

Hongqiao International Airport Shanghai, CN
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

As one of the three major air carriers in China, headquartered in Shanghai, China Eastern Airlines operates 111 domestic and overseas branches across the globe. Flying a fleet of 730 aircraft which is one of the youngest fleets in major airlines worldwide. Moreover, it boasts the largest-scale in-flight Wi-Fi wide-bodied fleet with leading commercial and technical models in China. The annual passenger turnover of CEA exceeds more than 130 million, ranking top 10 among global airlines As an official member of SkyTeam, China Eastern has extended its flight network from Shanghai to 1036 cities in 170 countries via close cooperation with alliance members. Frequent Flyer of Eastern Miles are privileged with 790 lounges worldwide within all 19 SkyTeam member airlines. China Eastern serves non-stop flights from Los Angeles, New York, San Francisco, Chicago, Vancouver and Toronto to Shanghai, along with the comprehensive flight network covering more than 110 cities in China, connecting Asia, Europe and Oceania. Focusing on providing high-quality aviation transport service, China Eastern has won awards at home and abroad in the fields of operation quality, service experience, CSR, etc., including the Flight Safety Diamond Award by CAAC - the highest flight safety award in China, nine consecutive years of Top 50 Most Valuable Chinese Brands by the Brand Rating Agency WPP, four consecutive years’ nomination of “Global Top 500 Most Valuable Brand” by UK's Brand Rating Agency - Brand Finance, two consecutive years of Top 20 Chinese Enterprises Global Image Award-ranking first in the transportation industry. Additionally, China Eastern got the A rating in the latest ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) criteria and listed the first place along with other five airlines, according to global index compiler MSCI.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bolognaairport.jpeg
Bologna Airport
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/china-eastern-airlines-north-america.jpeg
China Eastern Airlines, North America
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bologna Airport
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
China Eastern Airlines, North America
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bologna Airport in 2025.

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for China Eastern Airlines, North America in 2025.

Incident History — Bologna Airport (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bologna Airport cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — China Eastern Airlines, North America (X = Date, Y = Severity)

China Eastern Airlines, North America cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bolognaairport.jpeg
Bologna Airport
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/china-eastern-airlines-north-america.jpeg
China Eastern Airlines, North America
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

China Eastern Airlines, North America company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bologna Airport company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, China Eastern Airlines, North America company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bologna Airport company.

In the current year, China Eastern Airlines, North America company and Bologna Airport company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither China Eastern Airlines, North America company nor Bologna Airport company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither China Eastern Airlines, North America company nor Bologna Airport company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither China Eastern Airlines, North America company nor Bologna Airport company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bologna Airport company nor China Eastern Airlines, North America company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bologna Airport nor China Eastern Airlines, North America holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bologna Airport company nor China Eastern Airlines, North America company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

China Eastern Airlines, North America company employs more people globally than Bologna Airport company, reflecting its scale as a Airlines and Aviation.

Neither Bologna Airport nor China Eastern Airlines, North America holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bologna Airport nor China Eastern Airlines, North America holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bologna Airport nor China Eastern Airlines, North America holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bologna Airport nor China Eastern Airlines, North America holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bologna Airport nor China Eastern Airlines, North America holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bologna Airport nor China Eastern Airlines, North America holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H