Comparison Overview

Bologna Airport

VS

Aeromexico

Bologna Airport

Via del Triumvirato, 84, None, Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, IT, 40132
Last Update: 2025-11-27

We are an international airport classified as a "strategic airport" for the Central-North area in the National Airport Plan drawn up by the Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport. In 2024, we welcomed 10.8 million passengers, ranking as the seventh busiest airport in Italy by passenger numbers (Source: Assaeroporti – Airports 2030). Located in the heart of the Emilia food valley and the industrial districts of automotive and packaging, we serve a catchment area of approximately 11 million inhabitants and 47,000 companies with a strong inclination towards export and internationalization, and commercial expansion policies towards Eastern Europe and Asia. Regarding airport infrastructure, among our strategic objectives for the coming years, we have an important development plan focused primarily on expanding the passenger terminal, particularly in the security control and boarding gate areas. Our goal is to become one of the most modern and functional airport terminals in Italy, serving as a significant gateway to the city and the region. We are a dynamic, continuously developing organization, capable of ensuring those who collaborate with us the opportunity to fully express their potential while safeguarding their well-being. We care for the people who work with us and are constantly seeking talented individuals who wish to join our team and share in our challenges and successes. Together, we aim to make a difference and soar to even greater heights.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 315
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Aeromexico

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, MX
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Grupo Aeromexico, S.A.B. de C.V. is a holding company whose subsidiaries are engaged in commercial aviation and the promotion of passenger loyalty programs in Mexico. Aeromexico, Mexico’s global airline, operates more than 600 daily flights and has its main hub in Terminal 2 of the Mexico City International Airport. Its destinations network features 89 cities on three continents; including 43 destinations in Mexico, 18 in the United States, 17 in Latin America, 4 in Europe, 3 in Canada, and 3 in Asia. The Group's operating fleet of 133 aircraft is comprised of Boeing 787 and 737 jet airliners and next generation Embraer 170 and 190 models. In 2012, the airline announced its most significant investment strategy in Mexican aviation history, purchasing 100 Boeing aircraft including 90 MAX B737 jet airliners and 10 B787-9 Dreamliners. As a founding member of the SkyTeam airline alliance, Aeromexico offers customers more than 1,000 destinations in 177 countries served by the 20 SkyTeam airline partners rewarding passengers with benefits. Our vision Be the #1 choice for delivering the best personalized flying experience with a spirit of warmth and service. Our Values Deliver sustained growth by providing consistent service from the heart and creating unique experiences with safety and discipline. Our Behaviors Put safety first- Fully comply with norms, policies and procedures guaranteeing the safety and well-being of our customers and employees. Serve with excellence- Provide best- in-class quality service, taking care of the details that are important for your customers, and offer a personalized experience every step of the way. Collaborate as one- Work as a team, creating synergies and integrating different perspectives to be more efficient and unleash Aeromexico’s potential. Live with unshakable integrity- Be an ambassador for Aeromexico, acting with discipline and responsibility at all moments according to our values and Code of Conduct.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 12,843
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bolognaairport.jpeg
Bologna Airport
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aeromexico.jpeg
Aeromexico
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bologna Airport
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Aeromexico
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bologna Airport in 2025.

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aeromexico in 2025.

Incident History — Bologna Airport (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bologna Airport cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Aeromexico (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aeromexico cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bolognaairport.jpeg
Bologna Airport
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aeromexico.jpeg
Aeromexico
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Aeromexico company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bologna Airport company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Aeromexico company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bologna Airport company.

In the current year, Aeromexico company and Bologna Airport company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Aeromexico company nor Bologna Airport company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Aeromexico company nor Bologna Airport company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Aeromexico company nor Bologna Airport company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bologna Airport company nor Aeromexico company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bologna Airport nor Aeromexico holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bologna Airport company nor Aeromexico company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Aeromexico company employs more people globally than Bologna Airport company, reflecting its scale as a Airlines and Aviation.

Neither Bologna Airport nor Aeromexico holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bologna Airport nor Aeromexico holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bologna Airport nor Aeromexico holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bologna Airport nor Aeromexico holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bologna Airport nor Aeromexico holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bologna Airport nor Aeromexico holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H