Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

BOK FinancialBOK Financial
VS
SynchronySynchrony
BOK Financial

BOK Financial

101 E 2nd St, One Williams Center, Tulsa, OK, US, 74103

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://bokfinancial.com
729/1000Moderate

For more than a century, BOK Financial has been a financial services partner for consumers, businesses and wealth clients alike. We bring the kind of financial insight and resources you’d expect from a national institution — but we deliver it with the care, clarity, and...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:6,685
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Synchrony

Synchrony

HQ, Stamford, Connecticut, US, 06902

Last Update: 15/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.synchrony.com
777/1000Fair

At Synchrony, our driving force is to be essential to people's everyday lives by making it easier for the many millions of people who rely on us to access their essential needs and everyday wants with consumer financing that works for them – from their first credit card...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:15,772
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
BOK Financial

BOK Financial

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Synchrony

Synchrony

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BOK Financial in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Synchrony in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - BOK Financial (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BOK Financial cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Synchrony (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Synchrony cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
BOK Financial

BOK Financial

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
BOK4835648112625
Synchrony

Synchrony

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SYN304072725
🔒 Incident : Breach
SYN645080425

FAQ

Between BOK Financial company and Synchrony company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between BOK Financial company and Synchrony company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between BOK Financial company and Synchrony company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between BOK Financial company and Synchrony company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between BOK Financial company and Synchrony company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between BOK Financial company and Synchrony company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between BOK Financial company and Synchrony company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between BOK Financial company and Synchrony company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between BOK Financial company and Synchrony company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between BOK Financial company and Synchrony company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between BOK Financial company and Synchrony company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between BOK Financial and Synchrony, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between BOK Financial and Synchrony, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - BOK Financial or Synchrony ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - BOK Financial or Synchrony ?
Between BOK Financial and Synchrony, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between BOK Financial and Synchrony, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA