Comparison Overview
Boele & van Eesteren

Boele & van Eesteren
Laan van Vredenoord 14, Rijswijk (ZH), undefined, 2289 DJ, NL
Last Update: 03/04/2026
At Boele & van Eesteren, we are not just another development contractor - we are the partner you are looking for, for any project, large or small. With 125 years of experience behind us, we look not only at what needs to be done, but at the opportunities that present th...

Burns & McDonnell
9400 Ward Pkwy, Kansas City, 64114, US
Last Update: 02/04/2026
At Burns & McDonnell, our engineers, construction professionals, architects, planners, technologists and scientists do more than plan, design and construct. With a mission unchanged since 1898 — make our clients successful — we partner with you on the toughest challenge...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Boele & van Eesteren







Burns & McDonnell






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Boele & van Eesteren in 2026.
Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Burns & McDonnell in 2026.
Incident History - Boele & van Eesteren (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Boele & van Eesteren cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Burns & McDonnell (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Burns & McDonnell cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Boele & van Eesteren

Burns & McDonnell
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
phpMyFAQ before 4.1.5 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in GroupController::updatePermissions that allows GROUP_EDIT administrators to grant arbitrary rights to groups without verifying they hold those rights themselves. A delegated administrator can exploit this by assigning high-value permissions to a group they belong to, inheriting those rights and escalating privileges up to full administrative control.
n8n before 2.25.7 and 2.26.x before 2.26.2 contains an abstract syntax tree (AST) security validator bypass in the Python Code node. An authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows containing a Python Code node can bypass the validator and access the task executor module namespace. The issue only affects self-hosted instances where the Python Task Runner is enabled; where N8N_BLOCK_RUNNER_ENV_ACCESS is configured to allow it, this can disclose environment variables accessible to the task runner process.
Grav CMS before 2.0.0-beta.2 contains multiple code-execution vulnerabilities. Three unsafe unserialize() calls - in Scheduler\JobQueue, Framework\Cache\Adapter\FileCache, and Session - deserialize untrusted data without restricting allowed classes, enabling PHP object injection and, via a gadget chain, arbitrary code execution where an attacker controls the serialized input. Additionally, InstallCommand's git clone operation passes the branch, url, and path parameters into a shell command without escaping, allowing OS command injection via plugin/theme installation (which requires admin access). A Twig security blocklist bypass (server-side template injection) is also present. The issues are fixed in 2.0.0-beta.2.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability within the debug.pl script that is reachable without authentication. A remote attacker can submit a specially crafted HTTP request containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate input sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges on the underlying system.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability in the ms_service.pl service, which listens on TCP port 9000 by default and accepts custom network packets to perform device actions. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a specially crafted packet containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges.