Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
boatoon GmbH

boatoon GmbH Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

boatoon.com

Buy used boats or new boats, boat equipment and sailing clothing free shipping at the online-shop, yacht charter and boat expo.


boatoon GmbH A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

boatoon GmbH
Company Information
Website:http://www.boatoon.com
Employees number:4
Number of followers:11
NAICS:30
Industry Type:Manufacturing
Homepage:boatoon.com
boatoon GmbH Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 750 and 799
logo
boatoon GmbHManufacturing
Updated:
10/03/2026
757/1000
Fair
Baa
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
boatoon GmbH Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
boatoon GmbHManufacturing
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

boatoon GmbH
boatoon GmbHFair
Current Score
757Baa (FAIR)
01000
1 incidents
-10 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JULY 2026
758Before Incident
JUNE 2026
758Before Incident
MAY 2026
758Before Incident
APRIL 2026
757Before Incident
MARCH 2026
757Before Incident
FEBRUARY 2026
757Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
767Before Incident
Vulnerability
01 Jan 2026boatoon GmbH
NGINX and Boato Panel: Threat actors hijack web traffic after exploiting React2Shell vulnerability: Report

Threat Actors Exploit React2Shell Vulnerability to Hijack NGINX Web Traffic

757After Incident
CRITICAL-10
BOANGI1770244421
Threat Actors Exploit React2Shell Vulnerability to Hijack NGINX Web Traffic Researchers at Datadog Security Labs have uncovered a multi-stage, automated campaign where threat actors exploit the React2Shell vulnerability to compromise NGINX web servers, redirecting traffic for malicious purposes. The attacks primarily target organizations in Asia particularly those with domains ending in .in, .id, .pe, .bd, .edu, .gov, and .th as well as Chinese hosting infrastructure, often running Boato Panel for server management. Once inside a network, attackers deploy toolkits containing scripts for target discovery, persistence, and malicious configuration file creation. These files manipulate NGINX’s routing rules to hijack web traffic, enabling activities such as: - Fingerprinting organizational traffic - Injecting malware into users’ devices - Redirecting visitors to phishing pages to steal credentials The shift toward NGINX exploitation reflects a broader trend: as defenses like MFA and password managers strengthen, attackers are reverting to infrastructure-level attacks such as session cookie theft to bypass modern security controls. Notably, two IP addresses now account for 56% of observed exploitation attempts, a sharp consolidation from over 1,000 unique sources earlier. Defensive measures highlighted by researchers include: - Monitoring NGINX configuration file integrity to detect unauthorized changes - Applying the latest security patches, particularly for React and NGINX - Locking down configuration files to prevent tampering The attacks underscore the risks of unpatched vulnerabilities and poorly secured web infrastructure, with compromised sites facing reputational damage if flagged for hosting malware. The use of AI-driven exploitation tools further lowers the barrier for attackers, making server-side vulnerabilities a fast and cost-effective target.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Web Traffic Hijacking
MOTIVATION
Credential theftMalware distributionTraffic redirection
IMPACT
Systems Affected: NGINX web serversOperational Impact: Traffic hijacking, malware injection, phishing redirectionBrand Reputation Impact: Reputational damage if flagged for hosting malwareIdentity Theft Risk: High (credential theft via phishing)
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: Credentials (via phishing)Sensitivity Of Data: High (personally identifiable information)Personally Identifiable Information: Yes
DECEMBER 2025
767Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2025
767Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
767Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2025
767Before Incident
AUGUST 2025
767Before Incident

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for boatoon GmbH ?
?
What was boatoon GmbH's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in June 2026 ?
?
What was boatoon GmbH's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was boatoon GmbH's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was boatoon GmbH's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was boatoon GmbH's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was boatoon GmbH's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was boatoon GmbH's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was boatoon GmbH's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was boatoon GmbH's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was boatoon GmbH's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What was boatoon GmbH's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on boatoon GmbH's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with boatoon GmbH ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view boatoon GmbH's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?