Comparison Overview
BNP Paribas - Securities Services

BNP Paribas - Securities Services
9 Rue du Debarcadère, Pantin, 93500, FR
Last Update: 28/03/2026
We are a multi-asset servicing specialist committed to helping our clients achieve their ambitions both in terms of investments and cross-border distribution. In a changing world, you need a partner that understands the changing market landscape and the intricacies of ...

TMF Group
Luna ArenA, Herikerbergweg 238, , Amsterdam , North Holland, NL, 1101 CM
Last Update: 13/09/2026
We provide employee, financial and legal administration so that firms can invest and operate safely around the world. TMF Group is a single global team with over 11,000 colleagues in more than 125 offices across 87 jurisdictions, covering 92% of world GDP and 95% of F...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

BNP Paribas - Securities Services







TMF Group






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for BNP Paribas - Securities Services in 2026.
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for TMF Group in 2026.
Incident History - BNP Paribas - Securities Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)
BNP Paribas - Securities Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - TMF Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
TMF Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

BNP Paribas - Securities Services

TMF Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.
The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.
The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.
With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.
The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.