Comparison Overview
BNP Paribas - Securities Services

BNP Paribas - Securities Services
9 Rue du Debarcadère, Pantin, 93500, FR
Last Update: 28/03/2026
We are a multi-asset servicing specialist committed to helping our clients achieve their ambitions both in terms of investments and cross-border distribution. In a changing world, you need a partner that understands the changing market landscape and the intricacies of ...

TIAA
730 Third Ave., New York, NY, US, 10017
Last Update: 05/10/2026
At TIAA, we believe everyone has the right to retire with dignity. For more than 100 years, we’ve provided retirement plans, insurance, and investment services, empowering millions of people— in education, healthcare, and nonprofit —with the knowledge, guidance, and lif...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

BNP Paribas - Securities Services







TIAA






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for BNP Paribas - Securities Services in 2026.
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
TIAA has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - BNP Paribas - Securities Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)
BNP Paribas - Securities Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - TIAA (X = Date, Y = Severity)
TIAA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

BNP Paribas - Securities Services

TIAA
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.