Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

BNP Paribas Factor EspañaBNP Paribas Factor España
VS
SanlamSanlam
BNP Paribas Factor España

BNP Paribas Factor España

Emilio Vargas, 4, MADRID, MADRID, ES, 28043

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://factor.bnpparibas.es
754/1000Fair

Bnp Paribas Factor Spain is established in 2009 as a part of BNP Paribas Factoring Group which is the European Market Leader in Factoring with more than 50 years market experience.

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Sanlam

Sanlam

ZA

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sanlam.co.za
784/1000Fair

We’ve finally given a name to that special something a person exudes when they have a plan for their finances. It’s called The F Factor – and now that you know its name, it’s time you feel it too. Let's unlock your financial confidence, together.​ Our team is online we...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:19,623
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
BNP Paribas Factor España

BNP Paribas Factor España

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Sanlam

Sanlam

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BNP Paribas Factor España in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sanlam in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - BNP Paribas Factor España (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BNP Paribas Factor España cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Sanlam (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sanlam cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
BNP Paribas Factor España

BNP Paribas Factor España

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Sanlam

Sanlam

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between BNP Paribas Factor España company and Sanlam company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between BNP Paribas Factor España company and Sanlam company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between BNP Paribas Factor España company and Sanlam company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between BNP Paribas Factor España company and Sanlam company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between BNP Paribas Factor España company and Sanlam company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between BNP Paribas Factor España company and Sanlam company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between BNP Paribas Factor España company and Sanlam company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between BNP Paribas Factor España company and Sanlam company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between BNP Paribas Factor España company and Sanlam company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between BNP Paribas Factor España company and Sanlam company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between BNP Paribas Factor España company and Sanlam company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between BNP Paribas Factor España and Sanlam, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between BNP Paribas Factor España and Sanlam, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - BNP Paribas Factor España or Sanlam ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - BNP Paribas Factor España or Sanlam ?
Between BNP Paribas Factor España and Sanlam, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between BNP Paribas Factor España and Sanlam, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA