Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory PartnerBNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner
VS
SantanderSantander
BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner

BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner

N/A

Last Update: 28/03/2026

View Profile
756/1000Fair

BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner è la rete di consulenza patrimoniale che accompagna i clienti nella gestione del patrimonio con un approccio evoluto, completo, costruito su competenza, fiducia, e una forte attenzione alla relazione.

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Santander

Santander

Avenida de Cantabria S/N, Boadilla del Monte, 28660, ES

Last Update: 20/05/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://www.santander.com
662/1000Weak

Banco Santander (SAN SM, STD US, BNC LN) is a leading commercial bank, founded in 1857 and headquartered in Spain and one of the largest banks in the world by market capitalization. The group’s activities are consolidated into five global businesses: Retail & Commercial...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:141,634
Subsidiaries:24
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner

BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Santander

Santander

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

Santander has 85.19% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Santander (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Santander cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner

BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Santander

Santander

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
METORATICBANYAHATTADOAPPCOLGOO1777962591
🔒 Incident : Breach
BANSNOTIC1771979968
🔒 Incident : Breach
23A1764346412

FAQ

Between BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner company and Santander company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner company and Santander company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner company and Santander company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner company and Santander company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner company and Santander company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner company and Santander company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner company and Santander company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner company and Santander company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner company and Santander company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner company and Santander company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner company and Santander company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner and Santander, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner and Santander, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner or Santander ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner or Santander ?
Between BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner and Santander, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner and Santander, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-47238
SUMMARY

ClipBucket v5 is an open source video sharing platform. Prior to version 5.5.3 - #133, a normal authenticated user can edit another user's video subtitles because of a lack of authorization. They can upload subtitles, edit their name or delete them. This issue has been patched in version 5.5.3 - #133.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-11
UPDATED
Date2026-06-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-45418
SUMMARY

ClipBucket v5 is an open source video sharing platform. Prior to version 5.5.3 - #132, any authenticated user who can upload videos can add multiple subtitles from different files and change their title (English, Spanish...). The POST /actions/subtitle_edit.php request used to change their title includes a number parameter which is vulnerable to SQL Injection. A boolean-based blind SQL injection can be used to exfiltrate sensitive data. This issue has been patched in version 5.5.3 - #132.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-11
UPDATED
Date2026-06-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-45060
SUMMARY

ClipBucket v5 is an open source video sharing platform. Prior to version 5.5.3 - #129, the actions/progress_video.php endpoint is vulnerable to blind SQL injection. Any unauthenticated user can exploit the ids parameter to execute SQL queries and exfiltrate sensitive data. This issue has been patched in version 5.5.3 - #129.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-11
UPDATED
Date2026-06-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-42846
SUMMARY

ClipBucket v5 is an open source video sharing platform. Prior to version 5.5.3 - #140, ClipBucket's Remote Play feature allows any authenticated user to add a video by importing an external URL as the source. Some shell commands are run with the URL as a parameter. The URL is concatenated directly into shell commands without escaping then executed, so any shell metacharacter in the URL is interpreted. This results in arbitrary command execution. This issue has been patched in version 5.5.3 - #140.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-11
UPDATED
Date2026-06-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-6250
SUMMARY

An authenticated format string vulnerability exists in the ONVIF service of Tapo C110 v2 due to improper handling of user-controlled input.  Externally controlled data is interpreted as a format string, which can be used to manipulate stack memory, including control flow data such as return addresses. A remote authenticated attacker may redirect execution flow to existing internal functions, triggering an unauthorized factory reset, leading to loss of configuration, deletion of stored credentials and service disruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-11
UPDATED
Date2026-06-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA