Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory PartnerBNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner
VS
SantanderSantander
BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner

BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner

N/A

Last Update: 13/06/2026

View Profile
756/1000Fair

BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner è la rete di consulenza patrimoniale che accompagna i clienti nella gestione del patrimonio con un approccio evoluto, completo, costruito su competenza, fiducia, e una forte attenzione alla relazione.

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Santander

Santander

Avenida de Cantabria S/N, Boadilla del Monte, Madrid, ES, 28660

Last Update: 08/09/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://www.santander.com
651/1000Weak

Banco Santander (SAN SM) is a leading commercial bank, founded in 1857 and headquartered in Spain and one of the largest banks in the world by market capitalization. The group’s activities are consolidated into five global businesses: Retail & Commercial Banking, Openba...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:130,079
Subsidiaries:23
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner

BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Santander

Santander

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

Santander has 94.17% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Santander (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Santander cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner

BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Santander

Santander

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
METORATICBANYAHATTADOAPPCOLGOO1777962591
🔒 Incident : Breach
BANSNOTIC1771979968
🔒 Incident : Breach
23A1764346412

FAQ

Between BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner company and Santander company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner company and Santander company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner company and Santander company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner company and Santander company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner company and Santander company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner company and Santander company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner company and Santander company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner company and Santander company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner company and Santander company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner company and Santander company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner company and Santander company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner and Santander, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner and Santander, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner or Santander ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner or Santander ?
Between BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner and Santander, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between BNL BNP Paribas Wealth Advisory Partner and Santander, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8