Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

BMW South AfricaBMW South Africa
VS
Joyson GroupJoyson Group
BMW South Africa

BMW South Africa

1 Bavaria Road, Midrand, 0001, ZA

Last Update: 11/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bmw.co.za
772/1000Fair

BMW is an exclusive German vehicle and motorcycle manufacturing company. Our vehicles offer the very highest standards of aesthetics, dynamism, technology and quality. BMW aims to provide innovation, sustainability and efficiency to the motoring world, leading the wa...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:72
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Joyson Group

Joyson Group

99, Qingyi Road, Ningbo, Zhejiang, CN, 315000

Last Update: 21/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.joyson.com
762/1000Fair

Joyson Group is a young, ambitious high-tech company, its headquarter is located in Ningbo, China. With more than 100 bases in 30 countries, over 40000 employees globally. Founded in 2004, Joyson 's main products used to be automotive functional components. Since 201...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:10,806
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
BMW South Africa

BMW South Africa

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Joyson Group

Joyson Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BMW South Africa in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Joyson Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - BMW South Africa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BMW South Africa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Joyson Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Joyson Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
BMW South Africa

BMW South Africa

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Joyson Group

Joyson Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between BMW South Africa company and Joyson Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between BMW South Africa company and Joyson Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between BMW South Africa company and Joyson Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between BMW South Africa company and Joyson Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between BMW South Africa company and Joyson Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between BMW South Africa company and Joyson Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between BMW South Africa company and Joyson Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between BMW South Africa company and Joyson Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between BMW South Africa company and Joyson Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between BMW South Africa company and Joyson Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between BMW South Africa company and Joyson Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between BMW South Africa and Joyson Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between BMW South Africa and Joyson Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - BMW South Africa or Joyson Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - BMW South Africa or Joyson Group ?
Between BMW South Africa and Joyson Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between BMW South Africa and Joyson Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA