Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

BlueWater Federal SolutionsBlueWater Federal Solutions
VS
AlmavivA ExperienceAlmavivA Experience
BlueWater Federal Solutions

BlueWater Federal Solutions

1515 Wilson Blvd, Arlington, Virginia, 22209, US

Last Update: 01/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bwfed.com
752/1000Fair

BlueWater Federal, a Tetra Tech company, is a small business provider of Enterprise IT and Operational and Program Support to the Federal Government and its agencies including: • Cybersecurity Services • IT Architecture • Design/Build and Consolidation • IT Project Man...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:226
Subsidiaries:35
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
AlmavivA Experience

AlmavivA Experience

Avenida Rebouças 2728, São Paulo, 05402-500, BR

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
778/1000Fair

Líder em transformação digital nos mercados de Customer Experience e Debt Collection na América Latina. Combinamos tecnologia, inteligência e excelência operacional para entregar soluções completas que antecipam as necessidades dos nossos Clientes. São mais de 530 mil...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:22,366
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
BlueWater Federal Solutions

BlueWater Federal Solutions

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
AlmavivA Experience

AlmavivA Experience

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BlueWater Federal Solutions in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AlmavivA Experience in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - BlueWater Federal Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BlueWater Federal Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - AlmavivA Experience (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AlmavivA Experience cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
BlueWater Federal Solutions

BlueWater Federal Solutions

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
AlmavivA Experience

AlmavivA Experience

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between BlueWater Federal Solutions company and AlmavivA Experience company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between BlueWater Federal Solutions company and AlmavivA Experience company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between BlueWater Federal Solutions company and AlmavivA Experience company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between BlueWater Federal Solutions company and AlmavivA Experience company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between BlueWater Federal Solutions company and AlmavivA Experience company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between BlueWater Federal Solutions company and AlmavivA Experience company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between BlueWater Federal Solutions company and AlmavivA Experience company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between BlueWater Federal Solutions company and AlmavivA Experience company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between BlueWater Federal Solutions company and AlmavivA Experience company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between BlueWater Federal Solutions company and AlmavivA Experience company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between BlueWater Federal Solutions company and AlmavivA Experience company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between BlueWater Federal Solutions and AlmavivA Experience, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between BlueWater Federal Solutions and AlmavivA Experience, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - BlueWater Federal Solutions or AlmavivA Experience ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - BlueWater Federal Solutions or AlmavivA Experience ?
Between BlueWater Federal Solutions and AlmavivA Experience, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between BlueWater Federal Solutions and AlmavivA Experience, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1