Comparison Overview
BlueSoft
BlueSoft
ul. Aleje Jerozolimskie 134, Warszawa, 02-305, PL
Last Update: 03/08/2026
At BlueSoft, we’ve been transforming technology into business success stories since 2002. As an IT company, we go beyond technology and software—we focus on the entire delivery process. From the team’s structure to operations and architecture, we ensure our solutions r...
Intuit
2700 Coast Ave, Mountain View, 94043, US
Last Update: 23/09/2026
Intuit is a global technology platform that helps our customers and communities overcome their most important financial challenges. Serving millions of customers worldwide with TurboTax, QuickBooks, Credit Karma and Mailchimp, we believe that everyone should have the op...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
BlueSoft
Intuit
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
BlueSoft has 3.85% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
Intuit has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - BlueSoft (X = Date, Y = Severity)
BlueSoft cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Intuit (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Intuit cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
BlueSoft
Intuit
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was determined in a2aproject a2a-rs up to 0.4.3. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file a2a-server/src/error.rs. Executing a manipulation can lead to information exposure through error message. The attack can be executed remotely. This patch is called 713b943af94ab2d521d483b841618b97a2e78a4d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.
IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.0.2 has a missing secure attribute allowing sensitive cookies to be transmitted over unencrypted connections, potentially enabling an attacker to intercept session data through network-based attacks.
IBM Carbon Charts 0.4.0 through 1.27.19 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. The MeterChart component's Title.truncateTitle() function re-inserts a substring of user-supplied label text into the DOM via an unsanitized innerHTML write when the title exceeds the available container width. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser session.
IBM Sterling Connect Direct for Unix 6.4.0.0 through 6.4.0.6 and 6.3.0.0 through 6.3.0.7 apnotify utility is vulnerable to a code injection due to insufficient validation of user input.
IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow an unathenticated remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper access control. By sending a specially crafted HTTP request to any URL within the Navigator application prior to authentication, a bad actor could exploit this vulnerability to alter server-side session security state.