Comparison Overview

BlueKai

VS

dentsu

BlueKai

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749

BlueKai serves as a staple of the Oracle Data Cloud, as well as the Oracle Marketing Cloud. To learn more follow the Oracle Marketing Cloud page on LinkedIn, or visit our website at: http://www.oracle.com/marketingcloud

NAICS: 541613
NAICS Definition: Marketing Consulting Services
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

dentsu

1-8-1 Higashi-shimbashi, Tokyo, undefined, undefined, JP
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 800 and 849

We are dentsu. We team together to help brands predict and plan for disruptive future opportunities and create new paths to growth in the sustainable economy. We know people better than anyone else and we use those insights to connect brand, content, commerce and experience, underpinned by modern creativity. We are the network designed for what’s next.

NAICS: 541613
NAICS Definition: Marketing Consulting Services
Employees: 17,322
Subsidiaries: 50
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bluekai.jpeg
BlueKai
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dentsu-aegis-network.jpeg
dentsu
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
BlueKai
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
dentsu
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BlueKai in 2025.

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for dentsu in 2025.

Incident History — BlueKai (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BlueKai cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — dentsu (X = Date, Y = Severity)

dentsu cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bluekai.jpeg
BlueKai
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2014
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Unsecured Server
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dentsu-aegis-network.jpeg
dentsu
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

dentsu company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to BlueKai company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

dentsu company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to BlueKai company.

In the current year, dentsu company has reported more cyber incidents than BlueKai company.

Neither dentsu company nor BlueKai company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

dentsu company has disclosed at least one data breach, while BlueKai company has not reported such incidents publicly.

dentsu company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while BlueKai company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither BlueKai company nor dentsu company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither BlueKai nor dentsu holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

dentsu company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to BlueKai company.

dentsu company employs more people globally than BlueKai company, reflecting its scale as a Advertising Services.

Neither BlueKai nor dentsu holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither BlueKai nor dentsu holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither BlueKai nor dentsu holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither BlueKai nor dentsu holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither BlueKai nor dentsu holds HIPAA certification.

Neither BlueKai nor dentsu holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X