Comparison Overview
Bluecrest Financial Alliances

Bluecrest Financial Alliances
14241 Dallas Pkwy, Dallas, Texas, undefined, US
Last Update: 03/12/2025
At Bluecrest Financial Alliances, we strive to assist you in understanding your financial options in this ever-changing world. We start by assessing your financial situation and we listen to your needs and goals to learn more about your objectives. Then, we work as a te...

M&T Bank
345 Main St., Buffalo, 14203, US
Last Update: 22/04/2026
Great companies have an enduring sense of purpose. At M&T, our purpose is a simple one: make a difference in people’s lives and uplift the communities we serve. Founded in 1856 in Buffalo, NY we are now a top 11 full-service US-based commercial bank with a retail footpr...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Bluecrest Financial Alliances







M&T Bank






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Bluecrest Financial Alliances in 2026.
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
M&T Bank has 4.76% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Bluecrest Financial Alliances (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Bluecrest Financial Alliances cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - M&T Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)
M&T Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Bluecrest Financial Alliances

M&T Bank
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.
In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp
Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.