Comparison Overview

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan

VS

Aflac

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan

600 E Lafayette Blvd, Detroit, 48226, US
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan is a nonprofit corporation and an independent licensee of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association. BCBSM's commitment to Michigan is what differentiates it from other health insurance companies doing business in the state. That mission has never changed. Nearly 70 years ago, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan started with a purpose to provide people with the security of knowing they have health care when they need it. Today, that nonprofit mission is the same and the company is accomplishing it in many ways, including: Offering access to health care coverage for everyone, regardless of circumstances Never dropping your coverage for health reasons Partnering with the state to cover more than 32,000 children through MIChild Providing financial support to 30 free clinics statewide Contributing more money than any other company to provide Michigan with better health and health care Advocating and educating through Alliance for Advancing Nonprofit Health Care For more on the history of BCBSM, please visit our section on historical highlights: http://www.bcbsm.com/home/bcbsm/1930.shtml

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 10,358
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Aflac

1932 Wynnton Rd, Columbus, 31999, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 0 and 549

Over 50 Million people worldwide have chosen Aflac because of our commitment to providing customers with the confidence that comes from knowing they have assistance in being prepared for whatever life may bring. With Aflac, whether you're a large business or a small one, you can provide your employees with the kind of benefits they’d expect from a bigger company, helping your business stand out from the crowd. Hundreds of thousands of businesses across the United States already make Aflac available to their employees—at no direct cost to their company. Choose from a wide range of products that can help your employees with health events—from accidents, to disability, to cancer, to life insurance. Your employees enjoy benefits from Aflac, all employee-paid. Please check out Aflac.com for more information.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 18,043
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blue-cross-blue-shield-of-michigan.jpeg
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aflac.jpeg
Aflac
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Aflac
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan in 2026.

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

Aflac has 57.08% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Aflac (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aflac cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blue-cross-blue-shield-of-michigan.jpeg
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aflac.jpeg
Aflac
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2026
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Social Engineering
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Social Engineering, Insider Threat (Prior Embezzlement), Physical Theft (Evidence Seizure)
Motivation: Financial Gain, Fraudulent Insurance Claims, Theft of Retirement Funds
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Aflac company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Aflac company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan company has not reported any.

In the current year, Aflac company has reported more cyber incidents than Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan company.

Neither Aflac company nor Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Aflac company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Aflac company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan company nor Aflac company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan nor Aflac holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Aflac company.

Aflac company employs more people globally than Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance.

Neither Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan nor Aflac holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan nor Aflac holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan nor Aflac holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan nor Aflac holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan nor Aflac holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan nor Aflac holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H