ISO 27001 Certificate
SOC 1 Type I Certificate
SOC 2 Type II Certificate
PCI DSS
HIPAA
RGPD
Internal validation & live display
Multiple badges & continuous verification
Faster underwriting decisions
ISOSOC2 Type 1SOC2 Type 2PCI DSSHIPAAGDPR

Health Care Service Corporation serves nearly 23 million people across the United States through its portfolio of health benefit solutions. HCSC provides health coverage options for employers large and small, individuals and families, and Medicare and Medicaid plans. HCSC also offers related health care products and services such as pharmacy solutions, life and dental insurance, and health data technology. A Mutual Legal Reserve Company, HCSC is an independent licensee of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association. For nearly a century, we have enabled and coordinated the access to quality care for millions of members. Our experience and industry knowledge establishes a solid foundation for our future—driving innovations that further expand access, improve health outcomes, and reduce costs. Embedded within the fabric of how we operate is a deep sense of caring and commitment that informs how we serve our members, engage in local communities, and deliver positive change to the health care industry. As health care needs evolve, we leverage our portfolio of companies to deliver differentiated value to all industry stakeholders so that, together, we make more possible. Join HCSC and discover what new ways of thinking can mean for you, your community, our customers and our organization: HCSC.com/careers. We are an Equal Opportunity Employment / Affirmative Action employer dedicated to an inclusive, drug-free and smoke-free workplace. Drug screening and background investigation are required, as allowed by law. All qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, gender, national origin, disability, or protected veteran status.

Health Care Service Corporation A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

HCSC

Company Details

Linkedin ID:

blue-cross-and-blue-shield-of-illinois-new-mexico-oklahoma-&-texas

Employees number:

18,916

Number of followers:

146,444

NAICS:

62

Industry Type:

Hospitals and Health Care

Homepage:

hcsc.com

IP Addresses:

0

Company ID:

HEA_2524258

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreHCSC Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 750 and 799

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blue-cross-and-blue-shield-of-illinois-new-mexico-oklahoma-&-texas.jpeg
HCSC Hospitals and Health Care
Updated:
  • Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
  • Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
globalscoreHCSC Global Score (TPRM)

XXXX

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blue-cross-and-blue-shield-of-illinois-new-mexico-oklahoma-&-texas.jpeg
HCSC Hospitals and Health Care
  • Instant access to detailed risk factors
  • Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
  • Vulnerabilities
  • Findings

HCSC Company CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents
6
Attack Types
1
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenBlog DetailsIncident DetailsView
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana (BCBSMT)Breach85411/2024
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: A third-party data breach involving **Conduent**, a business services provider for BCBSMT, exposed sensitive personal and medical data of up to **462,000 Montanans** between **November 8, 2024, and March 5, 2025**. Compromised information includes **names, addresses, birth dates, phone numbers, billing details, and medical records**. While BCBSMT’s internal systems remained unaffected, the breach was described as having **‘far-reaching and jaw-dropping consequences’** by Montana’s State Auditor, James Brown. The exposed data was exfiltrated by a **‘threat actor’** but, per Conduent, has not been publicly leaked or sold on the dark web. BCBSMT claimed to offer **credit monitoring** to affected customers, though regulators reported delays in notifications. The incident prompted a **full-scale state investigation**, new cybersecurity initiatives, and a public awareness campaign to mitigate identity theft risks. Authorities emphasized **accountability, transparency, and legal action** against responsible parties.

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana (BCBSMT)Breach85410/2025
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana (BCBSMT), the largest health insurer in Montana, experienced a **cybersecurity incident** where an **unauthorized user accessed membership data**, compromising the **personally identifiable information (PII) of 462,000 individuals**. The exposed data included **names, addresses, dates of birth, telephone/fax numbers, email addresses, medical record numbers, health plan beneficiary numbers, account numbers, billing information, and service dates**. The breach exposed **sensitive medical and financial details**, raising concerns over identity theft, fraud, and misuse of health records. A **national class-action law firm (Lynch Carpenter, LLP)** is investigating potential claims for compensation, indicating significant legal and reputational repercussions. The incident highlights vulnerabilities in **healthcare data security**, with long-term risks for affected individuals, including financial fraud and privacy violations.

Blue Cross-Blue Shield of MontanaBreach85410/2024
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: A massive data breach at **Blue Cross-Blue Shield of Montana**, the state’s largest health insurer, exposed the sensitive personal and healthcare data of **462,000 customers**—nearly one-third of Montana’s population. The breach, caused by a **third-party vendor (Conduent)**, lasted from **October 2024 to January 2025** but was only disclosed in **October 2025**, nearly a year after discovery. Compromised data included **birth dates, Social Security numbers, and health condition records**, highly targeted by cybercriminals for identity theft, fraud, and dark web sales. Victims face risks of **medical identity theft (average cost: $20,000 per incident)**, lost healthcare coverage, increased premiums, and long-term financial harm. The company failed to encrypt data, delete obsolete records, or notify affected individuals promptly, violating Montana’s breach disclosure laws. A **class-action lawsuit** alleges negligence, breach of contract, and violations of consumer protection laws, seeking damages, security reforms, and a decade of third-party monitoring. The breach has already led to **spam, fraud calls, and identity theft cases**, with victims unable to mitigate risks due to delayed alerts.

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana (BCBSMT)Breach10056/2024
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana (BCBSMT) suffered a large-scale data breach via a third-party vendor, **Conduent**, between late 2024 and early 2025. The incident compromised the **personal and medical information** of **462,000 Montanans**—nearly **one-third of the state’s population**. Exposed data included **names, addresses, birth dates, billing and medical records, phone numbers, and other sensitive details**. The breach triggered an investigation by Montana’s **State Auditor and Insurance Commissioner**, James Brown, who criticized BCBSMT for delays in notification and transparency. The fallout led to regulatory scrutiny, potential enforcement actions, and a public awareness campaign urging affected residents to monitor financial and insurance statements for fraud. BCBSMT’s response remains under legal constraint, with the company declining to comment on pending litigation. The breach’s scale and sensitivity of leaked data—spanning **health and financial records**—pose severe risks of **identity theft, medical fraud, and long-term reputational damage** to both BCBSMT and the impacted individuals. Montana’s government deployed an **AI assistant** to manage the surge in consumer inquiries, highlighting the breach’s systemic impact on state-level cybersecurity and regulatory frameworks.

Blue Cross Blue Shield of MontanaBreach10055/2025
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organization's existence

Description: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana (BCBSMT) is currently under investigation following a **major data breach** that exposed the **personal and medical information of up to 462,000 customers** in the state. The breach originated from a **third-party vendor, Conduent**, which experienced a **cyber incident** compromising BCBSMT member data. While BCBSMT confirmed its own systems remained unaffected, the incident has raised significant concerns over **customer privacy and data security**. The Montana State Auditor’s office is actively probing the breach, emphasizing the **potential misuse of sensitive health and personal records**, which could lead to **identity theft, financial fraud, or targeted phishing attacks**. The scale of the breach—affecting nearly half a million individuals—highlights systemic vulnerabilities in **third-party vendor security protocols**, particularly in the healthcare sector. Customers impacted may face long-term risks, including **unauthorized access to medical histories, insurance fraud, or reputational harm** to BCBSMT due to eroded trust. The breach underscores the **critical need for robust cybersecurity measures**, especially when handling **highly sensitive health data**, and may prompt regulatory scrutiny or legal repercussions for both BCBSMT and Conduent.

Montana Blue Cross-Blue Shield (Montana BCBS)Breach10052/2025
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: Montana Blue Cross-Blue Shield (Montana BCBS), the largest insurance carrier in Montana, experienced a severe data breach through one of its vendors. The breach lasted several months and was discovered in February but only reported to the Montana Commissioner of Securities and Insurance in October. It exposed the **financial information and medical records** of over **460,000 Montanans**, including sensitive health and personal data. The breach posed significant risks of identity theft, financial fraud, and unauthorized access to private health records. In response, the Commissioner’s office deployed an AI-powered tool to assist affected residents in safeguarding their data, freezing credit, and monitoring for identity theft. A class-action lawsuit has also been filed by impacted residents. The breach involved a third-party vendor, highlighting vulnerabilities in supply chain security and the potential for large-scale exposure of highly sensitive personal and health data.

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana (BCBSMT)
Breach
Severity: 85
Impact: 4
Seen: 11/2024
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: A third-party data breach involving **Conduent**, a business services provider for BCBSMT, exposed sensitive personal and medical data of up to **462,000 Montanans** between **November 8, 2024, and March 5, 2025**. Compromised information includes **names, addresses, birth dates, phone numbers, billing details, and medical records**. While BCBSMT’s internal systems remained unaffected, the breach was described as having **‘far-reaching and jaw-dropping consequences’** by Montana’s State Auditor, James Brown. The exposed data was exfiltrated by a **‘threat actor’** but, per Conduent, has not been publicly leaked or sold on the dark web. BCBSMT claimed to offer **credit monitoring** to affected customers, though regulators reported delays in notifications. The incident prompted a **full-scale state investigation**, new cybersecurity initiatives, and a public awareness campaign to mitigate identity theft risks. Authorities emphasized **accountability, transparency, and legal action** against responsible parties.

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana (BCBSMT)
Breach
Severity: 85
Impact: 4
Seen: 10/2025
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana (BCBSMT), the largest health insurer in Montana, experienced a **cybersecurity incident** where an **unauthorized user accessed membership data**, compromising the **personally identifiable information (PII) of 462,000 individuals**. The exposed data included **names, addresses, dates of birth, telephone/fax numbers, email addresses, medical record numbers, health plan beneficiary numbers, account numbers, billing information, and service dates**. The breach exposed **sensitive medical and financial details**, raising concerns over identity theft, fraud, and misuse of health records. A **national class-action law firm (Lynch Carpenter, LLP)** is investigating potential claims for compensation, indicating significant legal and reputational repercussions. The incident highlights vulnerabilities in **healthcare data security**, with long-term risks for affected individuals, including financial fraud and privacy violations.

Blue Cross-Blue Shield of Montana
Breach
Severity: 85
Impact: 4
Seen: 10/2024
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: A massive data breach at **Blue Cross-Blue Shield of Montana**, the state’s largest health insurer, exposed the sensitive personal and healthcare data of **462,000 customers**—nearly one-third of Montana’s population. The breach, caused by a **third-party vendor (Conduent)**, lasted from **October 2024 to January 2025** but was only disclosed in **October 2025**, nearly a year after discovery. Compromised data included **birth dates, Social Security numbers, and health condition records**, highly targeted by cybercriminals for identity theft, fraud, and dark web sales. Victims face risks of **medical identity theft (average cost: $20,000 per incident)**, lost healthcare coverage, increased premiums, and long-term financial harm. The company failed to encrypt data, delete obsolete records, or notify affected individuals promptly, violating Montana’s breach disclosure laws. A **class-action lawsuit** alleges negligence, breach of contract, and violations of consumer protection laws, seeking damages, security reforms, and a decade of third-party monitoring. The breach has already led to **spam, fraud calls, and identity theft cases**, with victims unable to mitigate risks due to delayed alerts.

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana (BCBSMT)
Breach
Severity: 100
Impact: 5
Seen: 6/2024
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana (BCBSMT) suffered a large-scale data breach via a third-party vendor, **Conduent**, between late 2024 and early 2025. The incident compromised the **personal and medical information** of **462,000 Montanans**—nearly **one-third of the state’s population**. Exposed data included **names, addresses, birth dates, billing and medical records, phone numbers, and other sensitive details**. The breach triggered an investigation by Montana’s **State Auditor and Insurance Commissioner**, James Brown, who criticized BCBSMT for delays in notification and transparency. The fallout led to regulatory scrutiny, potential enforcement actions, and a public awareness campaign urging affected residents to monitor financial and insurance statements for fraud. BCBSMT’s response remains under legal constraint, with the company declining to comment on pending litigation. The breach’s scale and sensitivity of leaked data—spanning **health and financial records**—pose severe risks of **identity theft, medical fraud, and long-term reputational damage** to both BCBSMT and the impacted individuals. Montana’s government deployed an **AI assistant** to manage the surge in consumer inquiries, highlighting the breach’s systemic impact on state-level cybersecurity and regulatory frameworks.

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana
Breach
Severity: 100
Impact: 5
Seen: 5/2025
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization's existence

Description: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana (BCBSMT) is currently under investigation following a **major data breach** that exposed the **personal and medical information of up to 462,000 customers** in the state. The breach originated from a **third-party vendor, Conduent**, which experienced a **cyber incident** compromising BCBSMT member data. While BCBSMT confirmed its own systems remained unaffected, the incident has raised significant concerns over **customer privacy and data security**. The Montana State Auditor’s office is actively probing the breach, emphasizing the **potential misuse of sensitive health and personal records**, which could lead to **identity theft, financial fraud, or targeted phishing attacks**. The scale of the breach—affecting nearly half a million individuals—highlights systemic vulnerabilities in **third-party vendor security protocols**, particularly in the healthcare sector. Customers impacted may face long-term risks, including **unauthorized access to medical histories, insurance fraud, or reputational harm** to BCBSMT due to eroded trust. The breach underscores the **critical need for robust cybersecurity measures**, especially when handling **highly sensitive health data**, and may prompt regulatory scrutiny or legal repercussions for both BCBSMT and Conduent.

Montana Blue Cross-Blue Shield (Montana BCBS)
Breach
Severity: 100
Impact: 5
Seen: 2/2025
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: Montana Blue Cross-Blue Shield (Montana BCBS), the largest insurance carrier in Montana, experienced a severe data breach through one of its vendors. The breach lasted several months and was discovered in February but only reported to the Montana Commissioner of Securities and Insurance in October. It exposed the **financial information and medical records** of over **460,000 Montanans**, including sensitive health and personal data. The breach posed significant risks of identity theft, financial fraud, and unauthorized access to private health records. In response, the Commissioner’s office deployed an AI-powered tool to assist affected residents in safeguarding their data, freezing credit, and monitoring for identity theft. A class-action lawsuit has also been filed by impacted residents. The breach involved a third-party vendor, highlighting vulnerabilities in supply chain security and the potential for large-scale exposure of highly sensitive personal and health data.

Ailogo

HCSC Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
Incident Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan
statics

Underwriter Stats for HCSC

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Health Care Service Corporation in 2025.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Health Care Service Corporation in 2025.

Incident Types HCSC vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Health Care Service Corporation in 2025.

Incident History — HCSC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HCSC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

HCSC Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

Health Care Service Corporation serves nearly 23 million people across the United States through its portfolio of health benefit solutions. HCSC provides health coverage options for employers large and small, individuals and families, and Medicare and Medicaid plans. HCSC also offers related health care products and services such as pharmacy solutions, life and dental insurance, and health data technology. A Mutual Legal Reserve Company, HCSC is an independent licensee of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association. For nearly a century, we have enabled and coordinated the access to quality care for millions of members. Our experience and industry knowledge establishes a solid foundation for our future—driving innovations that further expand access, improve health outcomes, and reduce costs. Embedded within the fabric of how we operate is a deep sense of caring and commitment that informs how we serve our members, engage in local communities, and deliver positive change to the health care industry. As health care needs evolve, we leverage our portfolio of companies to deliver differentiated value to all industry stakeholders so that, together, we make more possible. Join HCSC and discover what new ways of thinking can mean for you, your community, our customers and our organization: HCSC.com/careers. We are an Equal Opportunity Employment / Affirmative Action employer dedicated to an inclusive, drug-free and smoke-free workplace. Drug screening and background investigation are required, as allowed by law. All qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, gender, national origin, disability, or protected veteran status.

Loading...
similarCompanies

HCSC Similar Companies

Inova Health

We are Inova, Northern Virginia and the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area’s leading nonprofit healthcare provider. With expertise and compassion, we partner with our patients to help them stay healthy. We treat illness, heal injury and look at a patient’s whole health to help them flourish. Through

UPMC is a world-renowned, nonprofit health care provider and insurer committed to delivering exceptional, people-centered care and community services. Headquartered in Pittsburgh and affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh Schools of the Health Sciences, UPMC is shaping the future of health thr

UnitedHealthcare

When it comes to your health, everything matters. That’s why UnitedHealthcare is helping people live healthier lives and making the health system work better for everyone. Our health plans are there for you in moments big and small, delivering a simple experience, affordable coverage, and supportive

R1 RCM

R1 is the leader in healthcare revenue management, helping providers achieve new levels of performance through smart orchestration. A pioneer in the industry, R1 created the first Healthcare Revenue Operating System: a modular, intelligent platform that integrates automation, AI, and human expertise

Dr. Sulaiman Al Habib Medical Group

Leading Private Healthcare Provider in the Middle East With a vision to be the most trusted healthcare provider in medical excellence and patient experience globally, Dr. Sulaiman Al-Habib Medical Group (HMG) has become the largest provider of comprehensive healthcare services in the Middle East. A

Nationwide Children's Hospital

Nationwide Children’s is one of America's largest pediatric hospitals, an international leader in research and is ranked in all 10 specialties on U.S. News & World Report’s 2025-26 “America’s Best Children’s Hospitals” list. Our staff, comprised of 1,600 medical professionals and over 16,000 employe

Ministério da Saúde

O Ministério da Saúde é o órgão do Poder Executivo Federal responsável pela organização e elaboração de planos e políticas públicas voltados para a promoção, a prevenção e a assistência à saúde dos brasileiros. É função do Ministério dispor de condições para a proteção e recuperação da saúde da pop

Alberta Health Services

Alberta Health Services (AHS) is proud to be part of Canada’s first and largest provincewide, integrated health system, responsible for delivering health services to more than 4.5 million people living in Alberta, as well as occasionally to some residents of other provinces and territories Our skil

Memorial Healthcare System

Be at the heart of exceptional care. Team MHS Florida is an award-winning group of friends and colleagues at one of the largest not-for-profit health systems in the nation. We're 17,000 strong, advancing towards a brighter future together. We're passionate about the work we do, delivering deep, pe

newsone

HCSC CyberSecurity News

October 26, 2025 07:00 AM
Healthcare Data Breach Statistics

The HIPAA Journal has compiled healthcare data breach statistics from October 2009, when the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)...

October 21, 2025 07:00 AM
UC San Diego’s Center for Healthcare Cybersecurity Protects Patients and Keeps Hospitals Running

Hospitals are increasingly reliant on networked technology to run lifesaving medical equipment and access patient records.

September 22, 2025 07:00 AM
43 Top Cybersecurity Companies to Know 2025

These companies block online threats, assess industry vulnerabilities and increase education and awareness about cybersecurity.

July 17, 2025 07:57 PM
US Healthcare at risk: Strengthening resiliency against ransomware attacks

The healthcare sector faces a rapidly increasing range of cybersecurity threats, with ransomware attacks emerging as one of the most significant.

July 09, 2025 07:00 AM
Watch: Senate convenes hearing on cybersecurity, health care

The Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee on Wednesday held a hearing on cybersecurity and how to ensure privacy for Americans.

June 19, 2025 09:17 AM
Cyber

Your organization's resilience is a top priority. With Deloitte's cybersecurity services, you can stay safe from threats while supercharging transformation.

June 01, 2025 07:00 AM
Top 10 Tech Companies to Work for in Albuquerque in 2025

Discover the top 10 tech companies in Albuquerque, NM, revolutionizing industries from AI to aerospace with innovation and employee-focused...

May 28, 2025 07:00 AM
St. Joseph Hospital owner says company targeted in cybersecurity incident

A cybersecurity incident that affected St. Joseph Hospital in Nashua stretched across its parent company's entire organization.

May 13, 2025 07:00 AM
Collective Health Appoints New CPO and CISO to Advance Company Growth Strategy and Cybersecurity Capabilities

Appointments of Caroline Jessen as Chief People Officer and Keven Sticher as Chief Information Security Officer & VP of Engineering bolster Collective Health's...

faq

Frequently Asked Questions

Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.

HCSC CyberSecurity History Information

Official Website of Health Care Service Corporation

The official website of Health Care Service Corporation is http://www.hcsc.com.

Health Care Service Corporation’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score

According to Rankiteo, Health Care Service Corporation’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 787, reflecting their Fair security posture.

How many security badges does Health Care Service Corporation’ have ?

According to Rankiteo, Health Care Service Corporation currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Does Health Care Service Corporation have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Health Care Service Corporation is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Health Care Service Corporation have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Health Care Service Corporation does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Health Care Service Corporation comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Health Care Service Corporation is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Health Care Service Corporation have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Health Care Service Corporation does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Health Care Service Corporation comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Health Care Service Corporation is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Health Care Service Corporation have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Health Care Service Corporation is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Industry Classification of Health Care Service Corporation

Health Care Service Corporation operates primarily in the Hospitals and Health Care industry.

Number of Employees at Health Care Service Corporation

Health Care Service Corporation employs approximately 18,916 people worldwide.

Subsidiaries Owned by Health Care Service Corporation

Health Care Service Corporation presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

Health Care Service Corporation’s LinkedIn Followers

Health Care Service Corporation’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 146,444 followers.

NAICS Classification of Health Care Service Corporation

Health Care Service Corporation is classified under the NAICS code 62, which corresponds to Health Care and Social Assistance.

Health Care Service Corporation’s Presence on Crunchbase

No, Health Care Service Corporation does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Health Care Service Corporation’s Presence on LinkedIn

Yes, Health Care Service Corporation maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/blue-cross-and-blue-shield-of-illinois-new-mexico-oklahoma-&-texas.

Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Health Care Service Corporation

As of December 11, 2025, Rankiteo reports that Health Care Service Corporation has experienced 6 cybersecurity incidents.

Number of Peer and Competitor Companies

Health Care Service Corporation has an estimated 30,925 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Health Care Service Corporation ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach.

What was the total financial impact of these incidents on Health Care Service Corporation ?

Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be $0.

How does Health Care Service Corporation detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?

Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an communication strategy with public disclosure via montana state auditor and media, and and third party assistance with cybersecurity data mining experts (conduent), and remediation measures with credit monitoring offered to affected individuals (claimed but not confirmed), and communication strategy with public statements by montana state auditor, communication strategy with social media updates (x), communication strategy with planned customer notifications, and communication strategy with public disclosure via press release (globe newswire) and data breach notifications sent to affected individuals, and incident response plan activated with delayed (notified customers starting 2025-10-24, 9+ months after discovery), and third party assistance with legal firms (graybill law, heenan and cook, paoli law), third party assistance with potential future auditors, and remediation measures with customer notifications (delayed), remediation measures with website breach notice, and communication strategy with limited (no comment on litigation), communication strategy with website notice, communication strategy with delayed customer letters, and and containment measures with breach closed in february 2023, and remediation measures with implementation of ai-powered assistance tool for residents, and recovery measures with ai tool for real-time resident support, recovery measures with website updates with breach information, and communication strategy with public announcement, communication strategy with ai tool for resident guidance, communication strategy with website portal (csimt.gov), and enhanced monitoring with ai tool interactions encrypted and monitored, and and recovery measures with ai-powered assistant for consumer inquiries, recovery measures with public awareness campaign, and communication strategy with urgent questions to bcbsmt/conduent, communication strategy with public statements, communication strategy with ai assistant (csimt.gov), communication strategy with advisories to monitor explanation of benefits..

Incident Details

Can you provide details on each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach (Third-Party Vendor Incident)

Title: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana Data Breach Investigation

Description: An investigation is underway into Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana following a major data breach that potentially affects hundreds of thousands of customers. The breach was linked to a third-party vendor, Conduent, and puts the personal and medical information of up to 462,000 Montana customers at risk. Blue Cross systems were not directly impacted.

Type: Data Breach (Third-Party Vendor Incident)

Incident : data breach

Title: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana (BCBSMT) Third-Party Data Breach via Conduent

Description: Montana state officials launched an investigation into a third-party data breach involving Conduent, a business services provider for Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana (BCBSMT). The breach exposed sensitive personal and medical data of up to 462,000 Montanans between November 8, 2024, and March 5, 2025. The exposed data includes names, addresses, birth dates, phone numbers, billing, and medical information. BCBSMT systems were not directly impacted, but the incident has prompted a full-scale regulatory investigation and new cybersecurity initiatives by the Montana State Auditor’s office.

Date Detected: 2025-01-13

Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-10-23

Type: data breach

Attack Vector: third-party vendor compromiseexfiltration of client files

Incident : Data Breach

Title: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana Data Breach

Description: An unauthorized user gained access to membership data of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana (BCBSMT), the largest health insurer in Montana. The breach impacted the personal information of 462,000 individuals, exposing personally identifiable information (PII) such as telephone numbers, fax numbers, email addresses, medical record numbers, health plan beneficiary numbers, account numbers, medical/dental service details, billing information, names, addresses, dates of birth, and service dates.

Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-10-23

Type: Data Breach

Threat Actor: Unauthorized user

Incident : data breach

Title: Blue Cross-Blue Shield of Montana Data Breach (2024-2025)

Description: A massive data breach at Blue Cross-Blue Shield of Montana, affecting up to 462,000 customers (approximately one-third of Montana's residents), exposed sensitive personal and healthcare information, including birth dates, Social Security numbers, and health condition data. The breach was allegedly caused by a third-party vendor, Conduent, and lasted from October 2024 to January 2025. The company was accused of failing to notify customers promptly (discovered in January 2025 but disclosed in October 2025) and not implementing standard data protection measures like encryption. A class-action lawsuit was filed, alleging negligence, breach of contract, and violations of Montana’s Consumer Protection Act. The breach led to identity theft risks, financial losses, and operational disruptions, with potential costs of $20,000 per victim for medical identity theft resolution.

Date Detected: 2025-01

Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-10-24

Type: data breach

Attack Vector: third-party vendor (Conduent)unsecured data storagelack of encryption

Vulnerability Exploited: unencrypted sensitive dataimproper data retentionthird-party security gaps

Motivation: financial gain (data sale on dark web)identity theftfraud

Incident : data breach

Title: Montana Blue Cross-Blue Shield Vendor Data Breach

Description: A data breach at a vendor of Montana Blue Cross-Blue Shield (BCBS) exposed financial and health information of over 460,000 Montanans. The breach lasted several months and was discovered and closed in February 2023, with public disclosure in October 2023. In response, the Montana Commissioner of Securities and Insurance implemented an AI tool to assist affected residents in safeguarding their data and navigating post-breach steps. The breach has also led to a class-action lawsuit by several residents.

Date Detected: 2023-02-01

Date Publicly Disclosed: 2023-10-01

Date Resolved: 2023-02-01

Type: data breach

Incident : data breach

Title: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana (BCBSMT) Data Breach via Third-Party Vendor Conduent

Description: A large-scale data breach at Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana (BCBSMT) compromised the personal and medical information of nearly one-third of Montana's population (~462,000 individuals). The breach occurred via a third-party vendor, Conduent, between late 2024 and early 2025. Compromised data includes names, addresses, birth dates, billing/medical data, phone numbers, and other sensitive information. Montana State Auditor James Brown launched an investigation, criticizing the notification timeline and deploying an AI-powered assistant to assist affected residents.

Type: data breach

Attack Vector: third-party vendor (Conduent) security breach

What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?

Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.

How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?

Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through third-party vendor (Conduent) and third-party vendor (Conduent).

Impact of the Incidents

What was the impact of each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach (Third-Party Vendor Incident) HCS1332313102325

Data Compromised: Personal information, Medical information

Systems Affected: None (Blue Cross systems were not impacted)

Brand Reputation Impact: Potential (due to exposure of sensitive customer data)

Identity Theft Risk: High (462,000 customers potentially affected)

Incident : data breach HCS1192111102325

Data Compromised: Names, Addresses, Birth dates, Phone numbers, Billing data, Medical data, Other sensitive information

Systems Affected: Conduent’s environment (limited portion)

Operational Impact: operations disruption (Conduent)regulatory investigationpublic awareness campaign

Brand Reputation Impact: severeeroded consumer trustregulatory scrutiny

Legal Liabilities: potential finesregulatory actionslegal accountability demands

Identity Theft Risk: ['high', 'statewide public awareness campaign launched']

Incident : Data Breach HCS0692206102325

Data Compromised: Telephone numbers, Fax numbers, Email addresses, Medical record numbers, Health plan beneficiary numbers, Account numbers, Medical/dental service details, Billing information, Names, Addresses, Dates of birth, Service dates

Brand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage due to exposure of sensitive health and personal data

Legal Liabilities: Lynch Carpenter, LLP is investigating claims for potential compensation; class action lawsuit possible

Identity Theft Risk: High (due to exposure of PII including names, addresses, dates of birth, and medical/financial details)

Payment Information Risk: Moderate (account numbers and billing information exposed)

Incident : data breach HCS3702237102525

Data Compromised: Birth dates, Social security numbers, Health condition data, Personally identifiable information (pii)

Systems Affected: third-party vendor systems (Conduent)customer databases

Operational Impact: investigation by Montana Commissioner of Securities and Insuranceclass-action lawsuitcustomer notifications delayed

Customer Complaints: ['spam calls', 'fraud attempts', 'identity theft reports']

Brand Reputation Impact: loss of trustnegative media coveragelegal scrutiny

Legal Liabilities: class-action lawsuit (7 counts: negligence, breach of contract, Montana Consumer Protection Act violations, etc.)potential regulatory fines

Identity Theft Risk: ['high (data sold on dark web for $40–$200 per record)', 'complete dossiers assembled by cybercriminals']

Incident : data breach HCS1202712111125

Data Compromised: Financial information, Medical records

Customer Complaints: class-action lawsuit filed

Brand Reputation Impact: high (statewide breach affecting largest insurance carrier)

Legal Liabilities: class-action lawsuit

Identity Theft Risk: high (financial and health data exposed)

Payment Information Risk: high

Incident : data breach HCS1002310112225

Data Compromised: Names, Addresses, Birth dates, Billing data, Medical data, Phone numbers, Other sensitive information

Customer Complaints: surge in consumer questions (handled via AI assistant)

Brand Reputation Impact: significant (described as 'deeply disturbing' with 'far-reaching consequences')

Legal Liabilities: potential enforcement actions for untimely notification (investigation ongoing)

Identity Theft Risk: high (residents urged to monitor Explanation of Benefits)

What is the average financial loss per incident ?

Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is $0.00.

What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?

Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Personal Information, Medical Information, , Personally Identifiable Information (Pii), Protected Health Information (Phi), Billing Data, , Personally Identifiable Information (Pii), Protected Health Information (Phi), , Pii (Birth Dates, Ssns), Health Records, Private Healthcare Information, , Financial Information, Medical Records, , Pii (Personally Identifiable Information), Phi (Protected Health Information), Billing Data and .

Which entities were affected by each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach (Third-Party Vendor Incident) HCS1332313102325

Entity Name: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana

Entity Type: Health Insurance Provider

Industry: Healthcare

Location: Helena, Montana, USA

Customers Affected: 462,000

Incident : Data Breach (Third-Party Vendor Incident) HCS1332313102325

Entity Name: Conduent (Third-Party Vendor)

Entity Type: Business Process Services

Industry: Outsourcing/IT Services

Incident : data breach HCS1192111102325

Entity Name: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana (BCBSMT)

Entity Type: health insurer

Industry: healthcare

Location: Montana, USA

Customers Affected: 462,000

Incident : data breach HCS1192111102325

Entity Name: Conduent

Entity Type: third-party business services provider

Industry: business process outsourcing

Incident : Data Breach HCS0692206102325

Entity Name: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana (BCBSMT)

Entity Type: Health Insurer

Industry: Healthcare

Location: Montana, USA

Size: Large (largest health insurer in Montana)

Customers Affected: 462,000 individuals

Incident : data breach HCS3702237102525

Entity Name: Blue Cross-Blue Shield of Montana

Entity Type: health insurance company

Industry: healthcare/insurance

Location: Montana, USA

Size: 462,000 customers (~1/3 of Montana's population)

Customers Affected: 462,000

Incident : data breach HCS3702237102525

Entity Name: Conduent (third-party vendor)

Entity Type: vendor/service provider

Industry: business process services

Incident : data breach HCS1202712111125

Entity Name: Montana Blue Cross-Blue Shield (BCBS)

Entity Type: health insurance provider

Industry: healthcare/insurance

Location: Montana, USA

Size: largest insurance carrier in Montana

Customers Affected: 460,000+

Incident : data breach HCS1202712111125

Entity Name: Unnamed Vendor of Montana BCBS

Entity Type: third-party vendor

Incident : data breach HCS1002310112225

Entity Name: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana (BCBSMT)

Entity Type: health insurance provider

Industry: healthcare/insurance

Location: Montana, USA

Customers Affected: 462,000 (~1/3 of Montana's population)

Incident : data breach HCS1002310112225

Entity Name: Conduent (third-party vendor)

Entity Type: vendor/service provider

Industry: business process services

Response to the Incidents

What measures were taken in response to each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach (Third-Party Vendor Incident) HCS1332313102325

Communication Strategy: Public disclosure via Montana State Auditor and media

Incident : data breach HCS1192111102325

Incident Response Plan Activated: True

Third Party Assistance: Cybersecurity Data Mining Experts (Conduent).

Remediation Measures: credit monitoring offered to affected individuals (claimed but not confirmed)

Communication Strategy: public statements by Montana State Auditorsocial media updates (X)planned customer notifications

Incident : Data Breach HCS0692206102325

Communication Strategy: Public disclosure via press release (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) and data breach notifications sent to affected individuals

Incident : data breach HCS3702237102525

Incident Response Plan Activated: delayed (notified customers starting 2025-10-24, 9+ months after discovery)

Third Party Assistance: Legal Firms (Graybill Law, Heenan And Cook, Paoli Law), Potential Future Auditors.

Remediation Measures: customer notifications (delayed)website breach notice

Communication Strategy: limited (no comment on litigation)website noticedelayed customer letters

Incident : data breach HCS1202712111125

Incident Response Plan Activated: True

Containment Measures: breach closed in February 2023

Remediation Measures: implementation of AI-powered assistance tool for residents

Recovery Measures: AI tool for real-time resident supportwebsite updates with breach information

Communication Strategy: public announcementAI tool for resident guidancewebsite portal (csimt.gov)

Enhanced Monitoring: AI tool interactions encrypted and monitored

Incident : data breach HCS1002310112225

Incident Response Plan Activated: True

Recovery Measures: AI-powered assistant for consumer inquiriespublic awareness campaign

Communication Strategy: urgent questions to BCBSMT/Conduentpublic statementsAI assistant (csimt.gov)advisories to monitor Explanation of Benefits

What is the company's incident response plan?

Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as delayed (notified customers starting 2025-10-24, 9+ months after discovery), , .

How does the company involve third-party assistance in incident response ?

Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through cybersecurity data mining experts (Conduent), , legal firms (Graybill Law, Heenan and Cook, Paoli Law), potential future auditors, .

Data Breach Information

What type of data was compromised in each breach ?

Incident : Data Breach (Third-Party Vendor Incident) HCS1332313102325

Type of Data Compromised: Personal information, Medical information

Number of Records Exposed: 462,000

Sensitivity of Data: High (includes medical and personal details)

Data Exfiltration: Likely (as data was 'impacted' by the incident)

Personally Identifiable Information: Yes

Incident : data breach HCS1192111102325

Type of Data Compromised: Personally identifiable information (pii), Protected health information (phi), Billing data

Number of Records Exposed: 462,000

Sensitivity of Data: high (includes medical and financial data)

Incident : Data Breach HCS0692206102325

Type of Data Compromised: Personally identifiable information (pii), Protected health information (phi)

Number of Records Exposed: 462,000

Sensitivity of Data: High (includes medical, financial, and personal identifiers)

Data Exfiltration: Yes (records were obtained by unauthorized user)

Personally Identifiable Information: namesaddressesdates of birthtelephone numbersfax numbersemail addressesmedical record numbershealth plan beneficiary numbersaccount numbers

Incident : data breach HCS3702237102525

Type of Data Compromised: Pii (birth dates, ssns), Health records, Private healthcare information

Number of Records Exposed: 462,000

Sensitivity of Data: high (medical + financial identity theft risk)

Incident : data breach HCS1202712111125

Type of Data Compromised: Financial information, Medical records

Number of Records Exposed: 460,000+

Sensitivity of Data: high (financial + health data)

Incident : data breach HCS1002310112225

Type of Data Compromised: Pii (personally identifiable information), Phi (protected health information), Billing data

Number of Records Exposed: 462,000

Sensitivity of Data: high (includes medical and billing data)

Personally Identifiable Information: namesaddressesbirth datesphone numbers

What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?

Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: credit monitoring offered to affected individuals (claimed but not confirmed), , customer notifications (delayed), website breach notice, , implementation of AI-powered assistance tool for residents, .

How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) ?

Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by breach closed in february 2023 and .

Ransomware Information

Was ransomware involved in any of the incidents ?

Incident : data breach HCS1192111102325

Data Exfiltration: True

Incident : data breach HCS3702237102525

Data Exfiltration: True

Incident : data breach HCS1002310112225

Data Exfiltration: True

How does the company recover data encrypted by ransomware ?

Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through AI tool for real-time resident support, website updates with breach information, , AI-powered assistant for consumer inquiries, public awareness campaign, .

Regulatory Compliance

Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach (Third-Party Vendor Incident) HCS1332313102325

Regulatory Notifications: Montana State Auditor involved in investigation

Incident : data breach HCS1192111102325

Legal Actions: full-scale investigation by Montana State Auditor’s office, potential enforcement actions,

Regulatory Notifications: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filing by Conduent

Incident : Data Breach HCS0692206102325

Legal Actions: Potential class action lawsuit (Lynch Carpenter, LLP investigating claims)

Incident : data breach HCS3702237102525

Regulations Violated: Montana Consumer Protection Act, Montana breach notification law (delayed disclosure),

Legal Actions: class-action lawsuit (7 counts), Montana Commissioner of Securities and Insurance investigation,

Regulatory Notifications: Montana Commissioner notified on 2025-10-08

Incident : data breach HCS1202712111125

Legal Actions: class-action lawsuit filed by residents,

Regulatory Notifications: Montana Commissioner of Securities and Insurance notified in October 2023

Incident : data breach HCS1002310112225

Regulations Violated: potential untimely notification to regulator, potential untimely notification to affected individuals,

Legal Actions: investigation ongoing; potential enforcement authority

Regulatory Notifications: Montana State Auditor's office notifiedaffected individuals notified (timeliness under scrutiny)

How does the company ensure compliance with regulatory requirements ?

Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through full-scale investigation by Montana State Auditor’s office, potential enforcement actions, , Potential class action lawsuit (Lynch Carpenter, LLP investigating claims), class-action lawsuit (7 counts), Montana Commissioner of Securities and Insurance investigation, , class-action lawsuit filed by residents, , investigation ongoing; potential enforcement authority.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

What lessons were learned from each incident ?

Incident : data breach HCS3702237102525

Lessons Learned: Timely breach notification is critical to mitigate harm., Third-party vendor risks must be proactively managed., Encryption and data retention policies are essential for protecting sensitive data., Delayed responses exacerbate financial and reputational damage.

Incident : data breach HCS1202712111125

Lessons Learned: Proactive use of AI tools can enhance post-breach resident support and triage, especially for large-scale incidents with limited staff resources. Ensuring AI tools are isolated from sensitive systems and comply with privacy standards mitigates secondary risks.

What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?

Incident : data breach HCS1192111102325

Recommendations: Enhance third-party vendor cybersecurity oversight, Implement statewide public awareness campaigns for identity theft prevention, Strengthen regulatory accountability for data breachesEnhance third-party vendor cybersecurity oversight, Implement statewide public awareness campaigns for identity theft prevention, Strengthen regulatory accountability for data breachesEnhance third-party vendor cybersecurity oversight, Implement statewide public awareness campaigns for identity theft prevention, Strengthen regulatory accountability for data breaches

Incident : data breach HCS3702237102525

Recommendations: Implement robust encryption for all sensitive data., Conduct regular security audits (internal + third-party)., Enforce strict data retention/deletion policies., Prohibit storing PII on unsecured cloud services., Establish clear breach notification protocols (comply with Montana’s ‘without reasonable delay’ law)., Provide comprehensive staff training on data security., Engage a third-party monitoring firm for 10+ years post-breach., Offer free credit/identity theft monitoring to affected customers.Implement robust encryption for all sensitive data., Conduct regular security audits (internal + third-party)., Enforce strict data retention/deletion policies., Prohibit storing PII on unsecured cloud services., Establish clear breach notification protocols (comply with Montana’s ‘without reasonable delay’ law)., Provide comprehensive staff training on data security., Engage a third-party monitoring firm for 10+ years post-breach., Offer free credit/identity theft monitoring to affected customers.Implement robust encryption for all sensitive data., Conduct regular security audits (internal + third-party)., Enforce strict data retention/deletion policies., Prohibit storing PII on unsecured cloud services., Establish clear breach notification protocols (comply with Montana’s ‘without reasonable delay’ law)., Provide comprehensive staff training on data security., Engage a third-party monitoring firm for 10+ years post-breach., Offer free credit/identity theft monitoring to affected customers.Implement robust encryption for all sensitive data., Conduct regular security audits (internal + third-party)., Enforce strict data retention/deletion policies., Prohibit storing PII on unsecured cloud services., Establish clear breach notification protocols (comply with Montana’s ‘without reasonable delay’ law)., Provide comprehensive staff training on data security., Engage a third-party monitoring firm for 10+ years post-breach., Offer free credit/identity theft monitoring to affected customers.Implement robust encryption for all sensitive data., Conduct regular security audits (internal + third-party)., Enforce strict data retention/deletion policies., Prohibit storing PII on unsecured cloud services., Establish clear breach notification protocols (comply with Montana’s ‘without reasonable delay’ law)., Provide comprehensive staff training on data security., Engage a third-party monitoring firm for 10+ years post-breach., Offer free credit/identity theft monitoring to affected customers.Implement robust encryption for all sensitive data., Conduct regular security audits (internal + third-party)., Enforce strict data retention/deletion policies., Prohibit storing PII on unsecured cloud services., Establish clear breach notification protocols (comply with Montana’s ‘without reasonable delay’ law)., Provide comprehensive staff training on data security., Engage a third-party monitoring firm for 10+ years post-breach., Offer free credit/identity theft monitoring to affected customers.Implement robust encryption for all sensitive data., Conduct regular security audits (internal + third-party)., Enforce strict data retention/deletion policies., Prohibit storing PII on unsecured cloud services., Establish clear breach notification protocols (comply with Montana’s ‘without reasonable delay’ law)., Provide comprehensive staff training on data security., Engage a third-party monitoring firm for 10+ years post-breach., Offer free credit/identity theft monitoring to affected customers.Implement robust encryption for all sensitive data., Conduct regular security audits (internal + third-party)., Enforce strict data retention/deletion policies., Prohibit storing PII on unsecured cloud services., Establish clear breach notification protocols (comply with Montana’s ‘without reasonable delay’ law)., Provide comprehensive staff training on data security., Engage a third-party monitoring firm for 10+ years post-breach., Offer free credit/identity theft monitoring to affected customers.

Incident : data breach HCS1202712111125

Recommendations: Implement AI-driven support tools for large-scale breach responses to improve real-time assistance., Ensure third-party vendors adhere to robust cybersecurity standards to prevent supply-chain breaches., Provide clear, accessible guidance for affected individuals on steps like credit freezes and identity theft monitoring., Monitor for patterns in resident inquiries to identify unattended issues post-breach.Implement AI-driven support tools for large-scale breach responses to improve real-time assistance., Ensure third-party vendors adhere to robust cybersecurity standards to prevent supply-chain breaches., Provide clear, accessible guidance for affected individuals on steps like credit freezes and identity theft monitoring., Monitor for patterns in resident inquiries to identify unattended issues post-breach.Implement AI-driven support tools for large-scale breach responses to improve real-time assistance., Ensure third-party vendors adhere to robust cybersecurity standards to prevent supply-chain breaches., Provide clear, accessible guidance for affected individuals on steps like credit freezes and identity theft monitoring., Monitor for patterns in resident inquiries to identify unattended issues post-breach.Implement AI-driven support tools for large-scale breach responses to improve real-time assistance., Ensure third-party vendors adhere to robust cybersecurity standards to prevent supply-chain breaches., Provide clear, accessible guidance for affected individuals on steps like credit freezes and identity theft monitoring., Monitor for patterns in resident inquiries to identify unattended issues post-breach.

Incident : data breach HCS1002310112225

Recommendations: Monitor Explanation of Benefits for suspicious activity, Update Montana laws to address AI and cybersecurity gaps (potential 2027 legislative action), Explore AI for regulatory efficiency (e.g., insurance product reviews)Monitor Explanation of Benefits for suspicious activity, Update Montana laws to address AI and cybersecurity gaps (potential 2027 legislative action), Explore AI for regulatory efficiency (e.g., insurance product reviews)Monitor Explanation of Benefits for suspicious activity, Update Montana laws to address AI and cybersecurity gaps (potential 2027 legislative action), Explore AI for regulatory efficiency (e.g., insurance product reviews)

What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?

Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Timely breach notification is critical to mitigate harm.,Third-party vendor risks must be proactively managed.,Encryption and data retention policies are essential for protecting sensitive data.,Delayed responses exacerbate financial and reputational damage.Proactive use of AI tools can enhance post-breach resident support and triage, especially for large-scale incidents with limited staff resources. Ensuring AI tools are isolated from sensitive systems and comply with privacy standards mitigates secondary risks.

References

Where can I find more information about each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach (Third-Party Vendor Incident) HCS1332313102325

Source: Q2 News (Helena, MT)

Date Accessed: 2023-10-23

Incident : data breach HCS1192111102325

Source: Newsweek

URL: https://www.newsweek.com

Date Accessed: 2025-10-23

Incident : data breach HCS1192111102325

Source: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Filing by Conduent

Date Accessed: 2025-04

Incident : data breach HCS1192111102325

Source: Montana State Auditor and Commissioner of Securities and Insurance (James Brown) Statements

Date Accessed: 2025-10-23

Incident : Data Breach HCS0692206102325

Source: GLOBE NEWSWIRE Press Release

Date Accessed: 2025-10-23

Incident : Data Breach HCS0692206102325

Source: Lynch Carpenter LLP Investigation Page

URL: https://www.lynchcarpenter.com

Incident : data breach HCS3702237102525

Source: Daily Montanan

Incident : data breach HCS3702237102525

Source: Lewis and Clark County District Court (Class-Action Lawsuit Filing)

Incident : data breach HCS3702237102525

Source: Montana Commissioner of Securities and Insurance Investigation

Incident : data breach HCS3702237102525

Source: Experian Study (Medical Identity Theft Costs)

Incident : data breach HCS3702237102525

Source: 2007 General Accounting Office Report (Data Fraud Timelines)

Incident : data breach HCS1202712111125

Source: Daily Montanan

URL: https://dailymontan.com

Incident : data breach HCS1202712111125

Source: Montana Commissioner of Securities and Insurance

URL: https://csimt.gov

Incident : data breach HCS1002310112225

Source: NBC Montana

Incident : data breach HCS1002310112225

Source: Montana Commissioner of Securities and Insurance (csimt.gov)

URL: https://csimt.gov

Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: Q2 News (Helena, MT)Date Accessed: 2023-10-23, and Source: NewsweekUrl: https://www.newsweek.comDate Accessed: 2025-10-23, and Source: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Filing by ConduentDate Accessed: 2025-04, and Source: Montana State Auditor and Commissioner of Securities and Insurance (James Brown) StatementsDate Accessed: 2025-10-23, and Source: GLOBE NEWSWIRE Press ReleaseDate Accessed: 2025-10-23, and Source: Lynch Carpenter LLP Investigation PageUrl: https://www.lynchcarpenter.com, and Source: Daily Montanan, and Source: Lewis and Clark County District Court (Class-Action Lawsuit Filing), and Source: Montana Commissioner of Securities and Insurance Investigation, and Source: Experian Study (Medical Identity Theft Costs), and Source: 2007 General Accounting Office Report (Data Fraud Timelines), and Source: Daily MontananUrl: https://dailymontan.com, and Source: Montana Commissioner of Securities and InsuranceUrl: https://csimt.gov, and Source: NBC Montana, and Source: Montana Commissioner of Securities and Insurance (csimt.gov)Url: https://csimt.gov.

Investigation Status

What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach (Third-Party Vendor Incident) HCS1332313102325

Investigation Status: Ongoing (led by Montana State Auditor)

Incident : data breach HCS1192111102325

Investigation Status: ongoing (full-scale investigation by Montana State Auditor’s office)

Incident : Data Breach HCS0692206102325

Investigation Status: Ongoing (Lynch Carpenter, LLP investigating claims)

Incident : data breach HCS3702237102525

Investigation Status: ongoing (regulatory investigation + class-action lawsuit)

Incident : data breach HCS1202712111125

Investigation Status: ongoing (class-action lawsuit in progress)

Incident : data breach HCS1002310112225

Investigation Status: ongoing (responses from BCBSMT/Conduent under analysis; potential public hearing)

How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?

Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Public disclosure via Montana State Auditor and media, Public Statements By Montana State Auditor, Social Media Updates (X), Planned Customer Notifications, Public disclosure via press release (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) and data breach notifications sent to affected individuals, Limited (No Comment On Litigation), Website Notice, Delayed Customer Letters, Public Announcement, Ai Tool For Resident Guidance, Website Portal (Csimt.Gov), Urgent Questions To Bcbsmt/Conduent, Public Statements, Ai Assistant (Csimt.Gov) and Advisories To Monitor Explanation Of Benefits.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?

Incident : data breach HCS1192111102325

Stakeholder Advisories: Montana State Auditor’S Office, Bcbsmt (Planned But Not Confirmed).

Customer Advisories: credit monitoring offered (unconfirmed)public awareness campaign on identity theft

Incident : Data Breach HCS0692206102325

Customer Advisories: Data breach notifications sent to affected individuals; legal review form provided for potential compensation claims (https://www.lynchcarpenter.com)

Incident : data breach HCS3702237102525

Stakeholder Advisories: Montana Commissioner Of Securities And Insurance (James Brown), Plaintiff Attorneys (Raph Graybill, John Heenan, David Paoli).

Customer Advisories: Breach notice posted on company website (2025-10)Customer notification letters sent starting 2025-10-24

Incident : data breach HCS1202712111125

Stakeholder Advisories: Ai Tool For Resident Guidance, Website Updates With Breach Information.

Customer Advisories: Do not share personally identifying information with the AI tool.Use the AI tool to learn about credit freezes, identity theft monitoring, and insurance claims.Contact the Commissioner’s office for one-on-one assistance if needed.

Incident : data breach HCS1002310112225

Stakeholder Advisories: Urgent Questions Sent To Bcbsmt/Conduent, Public Awareness Campaign For Affected Residents, Ai Assistant Deployed For Consumer Inquiries.

Customer Advisories: Monitor Explanation of BenefitsReport suspicious activity immediatelyVisit csimt.gov for AI-assisted support

What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?

Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were Montana State Auditor’S Office, Bcbsmt (Planned But Not Confirmed), Credit Monitoring Offered (Unconfirmed), Public Awareness Campaign On Identity Theft, , Data breach notifications sent to affected individuals; legal review form provided for potential compensation claims (https://www.lynchcarpenter.com), Montana Commissioner Of Securities And Insurance (James Brown), Plaintiff Attorneys (Raph Graybill, John Heenan, David Paoli), Breach Notice Posted On Company Website (2025-10), Customer Notification Letters Sent Starting 2025-10-24, , Ai Tool For Resident Guidance, Website Updates With Breach Information, Do Not Share Personally Identifying Information With The Ai Tool., Use The Ai Tool To Learn About Credit Freezes, Identity Theft Monitoring, And Insurance Claims., Contact The Commissioner’S Office For One-On-One Assistance If Needed., , Urgent Questions Sent To Bcbsmt/Conduent, Public Awareness Campaign For Affected Residents, Ai Assistant Deployed For Consumer Inquiries, Monitor Explanation Of Benefits, Report Suspicious Activity Immediately, Visit Csimt.Gov For Ai-Assisted Support and .

Initial Access Broker

How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?

Incident : data breach HCS1192111102325

High Value Targets: Client Files Containing Pii/Phi,

Data Sold on Dark Web: Client Files Containing Pii/Phi,

Incident : data breach HCS3702237102525

Entry Point: third-party vendor (Conduent)

High Value Targets: Pii, Health Records,

Data Sold on Dark Web: Pii, Health Records,

Incident : data breach HCS1202712111125

High Value Targets: Financial Information, Medical Records,

Data Sold on Dark Web: Financial Information, Medical Records,

Incident : data breach HCS1002310112225

Entry Point: third-party vendor (Conduent)

High Value Targets: Pii, Phi, Billing Data,

Data Sold on Dark Web: Pii, Phi, Billing Data,

Post-Incident Analysis

What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?

Incident : data breach HCS1192111102325

Corrective Actions: New Cybersecurity Initiatives By Montana State Auditor’S Office, Statewide Public Awareness Campaign On Fraud Prevention,

Incident : data breach HCS3702237102525

Root Causes: Failure To Encrypt Sensitive Data., Inadequate Third-Party Vendor Security Oversight., Delayed Breach Detection/Response (October 2024–January 2025)., Lack Of Proactive Customer Notification (Violated Montana Law)., Poor Data Retention Practices (Retaining Data Longer Than Necessary).,

Corrective Actions: Mandatory Encryption For All Pii/Health Data., Third-Party Vendor Security Assessments., Immediate Breach Notification Protocols., Periodic Security Audits (Internal + Independent)., Staff Training On Data Handling., Prohibition Of Cloud Storage For Unencrypted Pii., 10-Year Third-Party Compliance Monitoring.,

Incident : data breach HCS1202712111125

Root Causes: Third-Party Vendor Vulnerability (Specifics Undisclosed),

Corrective Actions: Implementation Of Ai-Powered Resident Assistance Tool, Enhanced Communication Via Website Updates, Encrypted And Monitored Ai Interactions To Prevent Secondary Breaches,

Incident : data breach HCS1002310112225

Corrective Actions: Ai Tool Deployment For Consumer Support, Potential Legislative Updates For Ai/Cybersecurity Oversight,

What is the company's process for conducting post-incident analysis ?

Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as Cybersecurity Data Mining Experts (Conduent), , Legal Firms (Graybill Law, Heenan And Cook, Paoli Law), Potential Future Auditors, , Ai Tool Interactions Encrypted And Monitored, .

What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?

Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: New Cybersecurity Initiatives By Montana State Auditor’S Office, Statewide Public Awareness Campaign On Fraud Prevention, , Mandatory Encryption For All Pii/Health Data., Third-Party Vendor Security Assessments., Immediate Breach Notification Protocols., Periodic Security Audits (Internal + Independent)., Staff Training On Data Handling., Prohibition Of Cloud Storage For Unencrypted Pii., 10-Year Third-Party Compliance Monitoring., , Implementation Of Ai-Powered Resident Assistance Tool, Enhanced Communication Via Website Updates, Encrypted And Monitored Ai Interactions To Prevent Secondary Breaches, , Ai Tool Deployment For Consumer Support, Potential Legislative Updates For Ai/Cybersecurity Oversight, .

Additional Questions

General Information

Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?

Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was an Unauthorized user.

Incident Details

What was the most recent incident detected ?

Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on 2025-01-13.

What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?

Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2023-10-01.

What was the most recent incident resolved ?

Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on 2023-02-01.

Impact of the Incidents

What was the highest financial loss from an incident ?

Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {'estimated_cost_per_victim': '$20,000 (medical identity theft)', 'total_potential_cost': None, 'credit_monitoring_cost': '$200/year per class member (minimum 5 years)', 'out_of_pocket_costs': 'common for victims'}.

What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?

Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Personal Information, Medical Information, , names, addresses, birth dates, phone numbers, billing data, medical data, other sensitive information, , telephone numbers, fax numbers, email addresses, medical record numbers, health plan beneficiary numbers, account numbers, medical/dental service details, billing information, names, addresses, dates of birth, service dates, , birth dates, Social Security numbers, health condition data, personally identifiable information (PII), , financial information, medical records, , names, addresses, birth dates, billing data, medical data, phone numbers, other sensitive information and .

What was the most significant system affected in an incident ?

Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was Conduent’s environment (limited portion) and third-party vendor systems (Conduent)customer databases.

Response to the Incidents

What third-party assistance was involved in the most recent incident ?

Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was cybersecurity data mining experts (conduent), , legal firms (graybill law, heenan and cook, paoli law), potential future auditors, .

What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident ?

Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident was breach closed in February 2023.

Data Breach Information

What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?

Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were names, dates of birth, birth dates, Personal Information, Medical Information, addresses, medical data, phone numbers, health condition data, medical/dental service details, service dates, fax numbers, email addresses, financial information, personally identifiable information (PII), other sensitive information, billing data, health plan beneficiary numbers, account numbers, Social Security numbers, medical record numbers, medical records, billing information and telephone numbers.

What was the number of records exposed in the most significant breach ?

Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 2.8M.

Regulatory Compliance

What was the most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation ?

Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was full-scale investigation by Montana State Auditor’s office, potential enforcement actions, , Potential class action lawsuit (Lynch Carpenter, LLP investigating claims), class-action lawsuit (7 counts), Montana Commissioner of Securities and Insurance investigation, , class-action lawsuit filed by residents, , investigation ongoing; potential enforcement authority.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?

Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Delayed responses exacerbate financial and reputational damage., Proactive use of AI tools can enhance post-breach resident support and triage, especially for large-scale incidents with limited staff resources. Ensuring AI tools are isolated from sensitive systems and comply with privacy standards mitigates secondary risks.

What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?

Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Strengthen regulatory accountability for data breaches, Provide comprehensive staff training on data security., Explore AI for regulatory efficiency (e.g., insurance product reviews), Offer free credit/identity theft monitoring to affected customers., Prohibit storing PII on unsecured cloud services., Establish clear breach notification protocols (comply with Montana’s ‘without reasonable delay’ law)., Provide clear, accessible guidance for affected individuals on steps like credit freezes and identity theft monitoring., Conduct regular security audits (internal + third-party)., Monitor for patterns in resident inquiries to identify unattended issues post-breach., Implement robust encryption for all sensitive data., Enhance third-party vendor cybersecurity oversight, Engage a third-party monitoring firm for 10+ years post-breach., Monitor Explanation of Benefits for suspicious activity, Implement AI-driven support tools for large-scale breach responses to improve real-time assistance., Ensure third-party vendors adhere to robust cybersecurity standards to prevent supply-chain breaches., Implement statewide public awareness campaigns for identity theft prevention, Update Montana laws to address AI and cybersecurity gaps (potential 2027 legislative action) and Enforce strict data retention/deletion policies..

References

What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Filing by Conduent, Q2 News (Helena, MT), Lynch Carpenter LLP Investigation Page, Montana Commissioner of Securities and Insurance Investigation, Montana Commissioner of Securities and Insurance, NBC Montana, GLOBE NEWSWIRE Press Release, Lewis and Clark County District Court (Class-Action Lawsuit Filing), Montana Commissioner of Securities and Insurance (csimt.gov), Newsweek, Daily Montanan, Montana State Auditor and Commissioner of Securities and Insurance (James Brown) Statements, 2007 General Accounting Office Report (Data Fraud Timelines) and Experian Study (Medical Identity Theft Costs).

What is the most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?

Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is https://www.newsweek.com, https://www.lynchcarpenter.com, https://dailymontan.com, https://csimt.gov, https://csimt.gov .

Investigation Status

What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?

Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Ongoing (led by Montana State Auditor).

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

What was the most recent stakeholder advisory issued ?

Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was Montana State Auditor’s office, BCBSMT (planned but not confirmed), Montana Commissioner of Securities and Insurance (James Brown), Plaintiff attorneys (Raph Graybill, John Heenan, David Paoli), AI tool for resident guidance, website updates with breach information, Urgent questions sent to BCBSMT/Conduent, Public awareness campaign for affected residents, AI assistant deployed for consumer inquiries, .

What was the most recent customer advisory issued ?

Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued were an credit monitoring offered (unconfirmed)public awareness campaign on identity theft, Data breach notifications sent to affected individuals; legal review form provided for potential compensation claims (https://www.lynchcarpenter.com), Breach notice posted on company website (2025-10)Customer notification letters sent starting 2025-10-24, Do not share personally identifying information with the AI tool.Use the AI tool to learn about credit freezes, identity theft monitoring, and insurance claims.Contact the Commissioner’s office for one-on-one assistance if needed. and Monitor Explanation of BenefitsReport suspicious activity immediatelyVisit csimt.gov for AI-assisted support.

Initial Access Broker

What was the most recent entry point used by an initial access broker ?

Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was an third-party vendor (Conduent).

Post-Incident Analysis

What was the most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis ?

Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was Failure to encrypt sensitive data.Inadequate third-party vendor security oversight.Delayed breach detection/response (October 2024–January 2025).Lack of proactive customer notification (violated Montana law).Poor data retention practices (retaining data longer than necessary)., third-party vendor vulnerability (specifics undisclosed).

What was the most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis ?

Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was New cybersecurity initiatives by Montana State Auditor’s officeStatewide public awareness campaign on fraud prevention, Mandatory encryption for all PII/health data.Third-party vendor security assessments.Immediate breach notification protocols.Periodic security audits (internal + independent).Staff training on data handling.Prohibition of cloud storage for unencrypted PII.10-year third-party compliance monitoring., Implementation of AI-powered resident assistance toolEnhanced communication via website updatesEncrypted and monitored AI interactions to prevent secondary breaches, AI tool deployment for consumer supportPotential legislative updates for AI/cybersecurity oversight.

cve

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions prior to 16.0.96 and 17.0.1 through 17.0.9 have a weak default password. By default, this is a 6 digit numeric value which can be brute forced. (This is the app_password parameter). Depending on local configuration, this password could be the extension, voicemail, user manager, DPMA or EPM phone admin password. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.96 and 17.0.10.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. In versions 2.8.11 and below, the MySQLWriteTool executes arbitrary SQL provided by the caller using PDO::prepare() + execute() without semantic restrictions. This is consistent with the name (“write tool”), but in an LLM/agent context it becomes a high-risk capability: prompt injection or indirect prompt manipulation can cause execution of destructive queries such as DROP TABLE, TRUNCATE, DELETE, ALTER, or privilege-related statements (subject to DB permissions). Deployments that expose an agent with MySQLWriteTool enabled to untrusted input and/or run the tool with a DB user that has broad privileges are impacted. This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. Versions 2.8.11 and below use MySQLSelectTool, which is vulnerable to Read-Only Bypass. MySQLSelectTool is intended to be a read-only SQL tool (e.g., for LLM agent querying, however, validation based on the first keyword (e.g., SELECT) and a forbidden-keyword list does not block file-writing constructs such as INTO OUTFILE / INTO DUMPFILE. As a result, an attacker who can influence the tool input (e.g., via prompt injection through a public agent endpoint) may write arbitrary files to the DB server if the MySQL/MariaDB account has the FILE privilege and server configuration permits writes to a useful location (e.g., a web-accessible directory). This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

Okta Java Management SDK facilitates interactions with the Okta management API. In versions 11.0.0 through 20.0.0, race conditions may arise from concurrent requests using the ApiClient class. This could cause a status code or response header from one request’s response to influence another request’s response. This issue is fixed in version 20.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

The Auth0 Next.js SDK is a library for implementing user authentication in Next.js applications. When using versions 4.11.0 through 4.11.2 and 4.12.0, simultaneous requests on the same client may result in improper lookups in the TokenRequestCache for the request results. This issue is fixed in versions 4.11.2 and 4.12.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=blue-cross-and-blue-shield-of-illinois-new-mexico-oklahoma-&-texas' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

What Do We Measure ?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge