Comparison Overview

BleepingComputer

VS

CrowdStrike

BleepingComputer

New York, US
Last Update: 2025-12-16

BleepingComputer is the leading destination for cybersecurity news for over 20 years, delivering breaking stories on the latest hacks, malware threats, and vulnerabilities to keep you and your organization secure online.

NAICS: 541514
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

CrowdStrike

Remote, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

CrowdStrike (Nasdaq: CRWD), a global cybersecurity leader, has redefined modern security with the world’s most advanced cloud-native platform for protecting critical areas of enterprise risk — endpoints and cloud workloads, identity and data. Powered by the CrowdStrike Security Cloud and world-class AI, the CrowdStrike Falcon® platform leverages real-time indicators of attack, threat intelligence, evolving adversary tradecraft and enriched telemetry from across the enterprise to deliver hyper-accurate detections, automated protection and remediation, elite threat hunting and prioritized observability of vulnerabilities. Purpose-built in the cloud with a single lightweight-agent architecture, the Falcon platform delivers rapid and scalable deployment, superior protection and performance, reduced complexity and immediate time-to-value. CrowdStrike: We stop breaches.

NAICS: 541514
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 10,400
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
4
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bleepingcomputer.jpeg
BleepingComputer
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crowdstrike.jpeg
CrowdStrike
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
BleepingComputer
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CrowdStrike
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer and Network Security Industry Average (This Year)

BleepingComputer has 203.03% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Computer and Network Security Industry Average (This Year)

CrowdStrike has 506.06% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — BleepingComputer (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BleepingComputer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CrowdStrike (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CrowdStrike cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bleepingcomputer.jpeg
BleepingComputer
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-party analytics vendor (supply chain attack)
Motivation: Extortion, data monetization on dark web
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Oracle zero-day vulnerability (Clop), unspecified (other gangs)
Motivation: financial gain (ransomware)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 09/2023
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crowdstrike.jpeg
CrowdStrike
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Insider Threat (Malicious Employee), Social Engineering (Voice-Phishing), Credential Theft (SSO Authentication Cookies), Dark Web/Telegram Leak
Motivation: Financial Gain, Extortion, Reputation Damage, Data Theft for Resale
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: compromised npm packages, malicious dependency injection, post-install script execution
Motivation: credential harvesting, unauthorized access, potential follow-on attacks
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Process Suspension
Motivation: Bypass Detection Mechanisms
Blog: Blog

FAQ

CrowdStrike company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to BleepingComputer company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

CrowdStrike company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to BleepingComputer company.

In the current year, CrowdStrike company has reported more cyber incidents than BleepingComputer company.

BleepingComputer company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while CrowdStrike company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both CrowdStrike company and BleepingComputer company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

CrowdStrike company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while BleepingComputer company has not reported such incidents publicly.

CrowdStrike company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while BleepingComputer company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither BleepingComputer nor CrowdStrike holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither BleepingComputer company nor CrowdStrike company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CrowdStrike company employs more people globally than BleepingComputer company, reflecting its scale as a Computer and Network Security.

Neither BleepingComputer nor CrowdStrike holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither BleepingComputer nor CrowdStrike holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither BleepingComputer nor CrowdStrike holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither BleepingComputer nor CrowdStrike holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither BleepingComputer nor CrowdStrike holds HIPAA certification.

Neither BleepingComputer nor CrowdStrike holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N