BlackFog
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
blackfog
Website:
Employees number:
29
Number of followers:
4,241
NAICS:
5112
Industry Type:
Homepage:
blackfog.com
IP Addresses:
0
Company ID:
BLA_2114783
Scan Status:
In-progress
BlackFog Company CyberSecurity Posture
blackfog.com
Founded in 2015, BlackFog is a global cybersecurity company that has pioneered on-device anti data exfiltration (ADX) technology to protect companies from global security threats such as ransomware, spyware, malware, phishing, unauthorized data collection and profiling. Its software monitors enterprise compliance with global privacy regulations and prevents cyberattacks across all endpoints. BlackFog uses behavioral analysis to preemptively prevent hackers from exploiting vulnerabilities in enterprise security systems and data structures. BlackFog’s preventative approach to security recognizes the limitations of existing perimeter defense techniques and neutralizes attacks before they happen at multiple points in their lifecycle. Trusted by corporations all over the world BlackFog is redefining modern cyber security practices.
BlackFog A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
BlackFog Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 0 and 549
BlackFog
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
BlackFog Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
BlackFog
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
BlackFog Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
2
Attack Types
1
Kido International: Top Ransomware Attacks of 2025: Major incidents, impacts & rising Cyber Threats Globally
Ransomware
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: Ransomware Surge in 2025: A Year of Escalating Threats and High-Profile Attacks 2025 marked a sharp escalation in ransomware activity, with cybercriminals deploying increasingly sophisticated tactics to disrupt critical services and extract massive ransoms. Global attacks surged by 34% compared to the previous year, with nearly half targeting essential sectors like energy, transportation, and manufacturing industries where operational downtime carries severe consequences. One of the most alarming incidents involved Kido International, a UK-based early childhood education provider. In September 2025, attackers stole sensitive data on 8,000 children and staff, including names, photos, and contact details. The breach prompted intervention from the UK’s National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) and led to arrests linked to the attack. Critical infrastructure faced relentless pressure. In December 2025, Romania’s national water management authority suffered a ransomware strike that encrypted 1,000 computers using Microsoft BitLocker, forcing manual operations to maintain water supply. The attack highlighted vulnerabilities in administrative systems, even when core services remain functional. The Qilin ransomware group emerged as a dominant threat, orchestrating multi-sector attacks across Europe. Targets included educational institutions, financial firms, and regional infrastructure, with some breaches exfiltrating over a terabyte of data. The group’s advanced tactics underscored the growing sophistication of ransomware operations. Commercial and industrial sectors were not spared. Major breaches in finance, healthcare, and entertainment exposed millions of user accounts, with ransom demands reaching tens of millions of dollars in some cases. Attackers frequently employed double or multi-extortion, encrypting systems while stealing data to maximize leverage. The proliferation of ransomware strains including Qilin, Akira, and Cl0p further complicated defenses. Many variants exploited unpatched vulnerabilities and weak remote access controls, particularly in industries with legacy systems or complex supply chains, such as manufacturing and healthcare. The surge in 2025 was driven by AI-powered automation, which enabled faster targeting, alongside persistent security gaps in patch management and remote access. As ransomware continues to evolve, organizations face mounting pressure to harden defenses against an increasingly aggressive threat landscape.
Fog ransomware victim financial institution: Fog ransomware attack on Asia financial org draws attention over use of employee monitoring software
Ransomware
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization's existence
Description: Unusual Fog Ransomware Attack on Asian Financial Institution Raises Espionage Concerns A recent cyberattack on an Asian financial institution involving Fog ransomware has drawn attention from researchers due to its atypical tactics, including the use of legitimate employee monitoring software (Syteca) and open-source penetration testing tools methods rarely seen in ransomware operations. Symantec researchers reported that the attackers deployed GC2, a tool leveraging Google Sheets, Microsoft SharePoint, and cloud storage for command execution and data exfiltration. While GC2 was previously used by Chinese state-backed group APT41 in 2023, its appearance in a ransomware attack marks a first. The attackers also established persistence after deploying ransomware a departure from typical ransomware behavior, where intruders exit the network post-encryption. The attack, which occurred last month, lasted two weeks before ransomware deployment. Researchers noted that two Microsoft Exchange servers were among the infected machines, a common entry point due to unpatched vulnerabilities. While the initial intrusion vector remains unclear, the use of Syteca a tool designed for employee monitoring suggests potential espionage motives, with ransomware possibly serving as a decoy. Fog ransomware, first detected in May 2024, initially targeted U.S. educational institutions, including a high-profile attack on the University of Oklahoma. The group behind it gained notoriety in April for using Elon Musk-themed phishing lures referencing the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) in ransom notes. The incident aligns with a broader trend of Chinese state-backed actors using ransomware as cover for espionage, as seen in past attacks across Asia and Oceania, including a 2023 breach of Palau’s government. Symantec has not attributed the attack to a specific threat actor but highlights the unusual persistence and tooling as red flags for potential dual motives financial gain and intelligence gathering.
BlackFog Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for BlackFog
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for BlackFog in 2026.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for BlackFog in 2026.
Incident Types BlackFog vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for BlackFog in 2026.
Incident History — BlackFog (X = Date, Y = Severity)
BlackFog cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
BlackFog Company Subsidiaries
Founded in 2015, BlackFog is a global cybersecurity company that has pioneered on-device anti data exfiltration (ADX) technology to protect companies from global security threats such as ransomware, spyware, malware, phishing, unauthorized data collection and profiling. Its software monitors enterprise compliance with global privacy regulations and prevents cyberattacks across all endpoints. BlackFog uses behavioral analysis to preemptively prevent hackers from exploiting vulnerabilities in enterprise security systems and data structures. BlackFog’s preventative approach to security recognizes the limitations of existing perimeter defense techniques and neutralizes attacks before they happen at multiple points in their lifecycle. Trusted by corporations all over the world BlackFog is redefining modern cyber security practices.
Loading...
BlackFog Similar Companies
Baidu is a leading AI company with strong Internet foundation, driven by our mission to “make the complicated world simpler through technology”. Founded in 2000 as a search engine platform, we were an early adopter of artificial intelligence in 2010. Since then, we have established a full AI stack,
At Avaya, we give our customers the freedom to take their business in the directions that benefit them most. We provide the paths for both customers and their employees where every moment big and small can drive in the moment, memorable experiences. The journey is theirs at the pace that makes sense
Thomson Reuters
Thomson Reuters (TSX/NDAQ: TRI) informs the way forward by bringing together the trusted content and technology that people and organizations need to make the right decisions. We serve professionals across legal, tax, accounting, compliance, government, and media. Our products combine highly special
Who are we? Amdocs helps those who build the future to make it amazing. With our market-leading portfolio of software products and services, we unlock our customers’ innovative potential, empowering them to provide next-generation communication and media experiences for both the individual end user
Autodesk
Autodesk is changing how the world is designed and made. Our technology spans architecture, engineering, construction, product design, manufacturing, and media and entertainment. We empower innovators everywhere to solve challenges, big and small. From greener buildings to smarter products and mo
GlobalLogic
GlobalLogic, a Hitachi Group company, is a trusted partner in design, data, and digital engineering for the world’s largest and most innovative companies. Since our inception in 2000, we have been at the forefront of the digital revolution, helping to create some of the most widely used digital prod
Booking.com
A career at Booking.com is all about the journey, helping you explore new challenges in a place where you can be your best self. With plenty of exciting twists, turns and opportunities along the way. We’ve always been pioneers, on a mission to shape the future of travel through cutting edge techno
Juniper Networks
Juniper Networks is leading the revolution in networking, making it one of the most exciting technology companies in Silicon Valley today. Since being founded by Pradeep Sindhu, Dennis Ferguson, and Bjorn Liencres nearly 20 years ago, Juniper’s sole mission has been to create innovative products and
Workday
Workday is a leading provider of enterprise cloud applications for finance and human resources, helping customers adapt and thrive in a changing world. Workday applications for financial management, human resources, planning, spend management, and analytics are built with artificial intelligence and
.png)
BlackFog CyberSecurity News
January 15, 2026 01:26 PM
Ransomware targets specific industries as attack success rate soars
Last month broke ransomware records -- and not in a good way. The latest report from Blackfog shows 66 publicly disclosed ransomware attacks, the highest.
January 14, 2026 11:06 AM
A quarter of cybersecurity leaders are ready to quit
A new survey finds that 24 percent of CISOs or IT security decision makers (ITS DMs) are actively looking to leave their position.
January 14, 2026 06:29 AM
Q3 ransomware attacks up 36 percent year-on-year
New data from BlackFog shows publicly disclosed ransomware attacks continued to set new records in the third quarter of this year, with 270 attacks -- a 36.
January 14, 2026 05:40 AM
2024 broke records for ransomware attacks
Ransomware attacks reached record levels throughout 2024 according to the latest State of Ransomware report from BlackFog.
January 13, 2026 11:51 PM
First quarter of 2025 sees record numbers of ransomware attacks
New findings from threat protection platform BlackFog show the first quarter of 2025 has seen record-breaking numbers of publicly disclosed ransomware.
December 05, 2025 08:00 AM
Endpoint Security and Network Monitoring News for the Week of December 5th: BlackFog, Skyhawk Security, Zenity, and More
The editors have curated a list of noteworthy news about endpoint security and network monitoring from the week of December 5th.
December 05, 2025 08:00 AM
BlackFog launches ADX Vision to combat rising shadow AI risks
BlackFog unveils ADX Vision, a tool to monitor and block unauthorised AI use at work, addressing rising shadow AI data security risks.
November 25, 2025 08:00 AM
‘A Notification Is All That It Takes!’- Researchers Warn Of Growing Fake System Alerts Compromising Personal Data
Cybercriminals are exploiting browser notifications with Matrix Push C2, a new platform mimicking system alerts to steal credentials from...
November 21, 2025 08:00 AM
Hackers Using New Matrix Push C2 to Deliver Malware and Phishing Attacks via Web Browser
Matrix Push C2 abuses browser push notifications for fileless attacks, enabling silent malware delivery, phishing, redirects, etc..
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
BlackFog CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of BlackFog
The official website of BlackFog is https://www.blackfog.com.
BlackFog’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, BlackFog’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 446, reflecting their Critical security posture.
How many security badges does BlackFog’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, BlackFog currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Has BlackFog been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?
According to Rankiteo, BlackFog has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.
Does BlackFog have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, BlackFog is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does BlackFog have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, BlackFog does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does BlackFog comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, BlackFog is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does BlackFog have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, BlackFog does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does BlackFog comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, BlackFog is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does BlackFog have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,BlackFog is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of BlackFog
BlackFog operates primarily in the Software Development industry.
Number of Employees at BlackFog
BlackFog employs approximately 29 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by BlackFog
BlackFog presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
BlackFog’s LinkedIn Followers
BlackFog’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 4,241 followers.
NAICS Classification of BlackFog
BlackFog is classified under the NAICS code 5112, which corresponds to Software Publishers.
BlackFog’s Presence on Crunchbase
Yes, BlackFog has an official profile on Crunchbase, which can be accessed here: https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/blackfog-inc.
BlackFog’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, BlackFog maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/blackfog.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving BlackFog
As of January 21, 2026, Rankiteo reports that BlackFog has experienced 2 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
BlackFog has an estimated 28,123 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at BlackFog ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Ransomware.
How does BlackFog detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an law enforcement notified with yes (uk ncsc involvement in kido international case), and third party assistance with symantec (research and analysis)..
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: Global Ransomware Surge and Key Incidents in 2025
Description: Ransomware remained one of the most pervasive and damaging cyber threats in 2025, targeting organizations across industries, disrupting critical services, and exposing millions of records. As cybercriminals developed more sophisticated methods, the number and severity of ransomware attacks surged significantly throughout the year.
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025
Type: Ransomware
Vulnerability Exploited: gaps in patchingremote access securitylegacy systems
Threat Actor: Qilin ransomware groupAkiraCl0p
Motivation: financial gaindata exfiltrationoperational disruption
Title: Fog Ransomware Attack on Asian Financial Institution
Description: A cyberattack on a financial institution in Asia featuring the Fog ransomware involved unusual tools and tactics, including legitimate employee monitoring software (Syteca) and open-source pentesting tools (GC2). The attack raised concerns due to post-ransomware persistence efforts, suggesting possible espionage motives alongside ransomware deployment.
Type: Ransomware
Attack Vector: Microsoft Exchange servers (likely exploiting longstanding vulnerabilities)
Vulnerability Exploited: Microsoft Exchange server vulnerabilities
Motivation: Financial gainEspionage (possible decoy)
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Ransomware.
How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Microsoft Exchange servers.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : Ransomware BLA1767018725
Data Compromised: millions of records
Systems Affected: critical infrastructurecorporate networkspublic sector systems
Operational Impact: disruption of critical services
Brand Reputation Impact: significant
Identity Theft Risk: high
Incident : Ransomware BLA1767165685
Systems Affected: Microsoft Exchange servers
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Personal Data, Sensitive Information and .
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : Ransomware BLA1767018725
Entity Name: Kido International
Entity Type: Early childhood education provider
Industry: Education
Location: UK
Customers Affected: 8,000 children and staff
Incident : Ransomware BLA1767018725
Entity Name: Romania’s national water management authority
Entity Type: Government agency
Industry: Water management
Location: Romania
Incident : Ransomware BLA1767018725
Entity Type: Educational services, financial firms, regional infrastructure
Industry: Education, Finance, Infrastructure
Location: Europe
Incident : Ransomware BLA1767018725
Entity Type: Large corporate and government entities
Industry: Finance, Healthcare, Consumer entertainment
Customers Affected: millions of user accounts
Incident : Ransomware BLA1767165685
Entity Type: Financial Institution
Industry: Finance
Location: Asia
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident ?
Incident : Ransomware BLA1767018725
Law Enforcement Notified: Yes (UK NCSC involvement in Kido International case)
Incident : Ransomware BLA1767165685
Third Party Assistance: Symantec (research and analysis)
How does the company involve third-party assistance in incident response ?
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through Symantec (research and analysis).
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : Ransomware BLA1767018725
Type of Data Compromised: Personal data, Sensitive information
Number of Records Exposed: 8,000 (Kido International), over a terabyte (Qilin group)
Sensitivity of Data: high (children's data)PII
Data Exfiltration: Yes
Data Encryption: Yes (via Microsoft BitLocker in Romania case)
Personally Identifiable Information: Yes (names, photographs, contact information)
Incident : Ransomware BLA1767165685
Data Encryption: True
Ransomware Information
Was ransomware involved in any of the incidents ?
Incident : Ransomware BLA1767018725
Ransom Demanded: double-digit millions in some cases
Ransomware Strain: QilinAkiraCl0p
Data Encryption: Yes
Data Exfiltration: Yes (double extortion tactics)
Incident : Ransomware BLA1767165685
Ransomware Strain: Fog
Data Encryption: True
Data Exfiltration: True
Regulatory Compliance
Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?
Incident : Ransomware BLA1767018725
Regulatory Notifications: UK NCSC guidance issued for Kido International
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What lessons were learned from each incident ?
Incident : Ransomware BLA1767018725
Lessons Learned: The increasing use of artificial intelligence by threat actors enabled faster automation and targeting, while gaps in patching and remote access security continued to create vulnerabilities. Industries with complex supply chains or legacy systems were particularly at risk.
Incident : Ransomware BLA1767165685
Lessons Learned: Unusual tools (e.g., Syteca, GC2) and post-ransomware persistence suggest potential espionage motives. Legitimate software can be abused for malicious purposes, and attackers may use ransomware as a decoy.
What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?
Incident : Ransomware BLA1767018725
Recommendations: Adopt multi-layered defenses, real-time monitoring, regular software patching, comprehensive incident response plans, employee training, and zero-trust approaches to mitigate future attacks.
Incident : Ransomware BLA1767165685
Recommendations: Monitor and restrict the use of legitimate employee monitoring tools like Syteca to prevent abuse., Patch and secure Microsoft Exchange servers to mitigate common entry points., Enhance detection capabilities for open-source pentesting tools (e.g., GC2) used in attacks., Implement network segmentation and enhanced monitoring to detect post-ransomware persistence., Assume espionage motives if unusual tools or persistence behaviors are observed.Monitor and restrict the use of legitimate employee monitoring tools like Syteca to prevent abuse., Patch and secure Microsoft Exchange servers to mitigate common entry points., Enhance detection capabilities for open-source pentesting tools (e.g., GC2) used in attacks., Implement network segmentation and enhanced monitoring to detect post-ransomware persistence., Assume espionage motives if unusual tools or persistence behaviors are observed.Monitor and restrict the use of legitimate employee monitoring tools like Syteca to prevent abuse., Patch and secure Microsoft Exchange servers to mitigate common entry points., Enhance detection capabilities for open-source pentesting tools (e.g., GC2) used in attacks., Implement network segmentation and enhanced monitoring to detect post-ransomware persistence., Assume espionage motives if unusual tools or persistence behaviors are observed.Monitor and restrict the use of legitimate employee monitoring tools like Syteca to prevent abuse., Patch and secure Microsoft Exchange servers to mitigate common entry points., Enhance detection capabilities for open-source pentesting tools (e.g., GC2) used in attacks., Implement network segmentation and enhanced monitoring to detect post-ransomware persistence., Assume espionage motives if unusual tools or persistence behaviors are observed.Monitor and restrict the use of legitimate employee monitoring tools like Syteca to prevent abuse., Patch and secure Microsoft Exchange servers to mitigate common entry points., Enhance detection capabilities for open-source pentesting tools (e.g., GC2) used in attacks., Implement network segmentation and enhanced monitoring to detect post-ransomware persistence., Assume espionage motives if unusual tools or persistence behaviors are observed.
What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are The increasing use of artificial intelligence by threat actors enabled faster automation and targeting, while gaps in patching and remote access security continued to create vulnerabilities. Industries with complex supply chains or legacy systems were particularly at risk.Unusual tools (e.g., Syteca, GC2) and post-ransomware persistence suggest potential espionage motives. Legitimate software can be abused for malicious purposes, and attackers may use ransomware as a decoy.
What recommendations has the company implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: Adopt multi-layered defenses, real-time monitoring, regular software patching, comprehensive incident response plans, employee training and and zero-trust approaches to mitigate future attacks..
References
Where can I find more information about each incident ?
Incident : Ransomware BLA1767018725
Source: Cybersecurity intelligence reports
Incident : Ransomware BLA1767018725
Source: Threat intelligence trackers
Incident : Ransomware BLA1767018725
Source: UK National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC)
Incident : Ransomware BLA1767165685
Source: Symantec
Incident : Ransomware BLA1767165685
Source: Recorded Future News
Incident : Ransomware BLA1767165685
Source: BeyondTrust
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: Cybersecurity intelligence reports, and Source: Threat intelligence trackers, and Source: UK National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC), and Source: Symantec, and Source: Recorded Future News, and Source: BeyondTrust.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?
Incident : Ransomware BLA1767165685
Investigation Status: Ongoing
Initial Access Broker
How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?
Incident : Ransomware BLA1767165685
Entry Point: Microsoft Exchange servers
Reconnaissance Period: 2 weeks
Post-Incident Analysis
What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?
Incident : Ransomware BLA1767018725
Root Causes: Ai-Driven Automation By Threat Actors, Gaps In Patching, Remote Access Security Vulnerabilities, Legacy Systems,
Corrective Actions: Multi-Layered Defenses, Real-Time Monitoring, Regular Software Patching, Incident Response Plans, Employee Training, Zero-Trust Approaches,
Incident : Ransomware BLA1767165685
Root Causes: Exploitation Of Microsoft Exchange Server Vulnerabilities, Abuse Of Legitimate Employee Monitoring Software (Syteca), Use Of Open-Source Pentesting Tools (Gc2) For Command Execution And Data Exfiltration,
Corrective Actions: Patch And Secure Microsoft Exchange Servers, Restrict And Monitor The Use Of Legitimate Tools Like Syteca, Enhance Detection For Unusual Tools And Post-Ransomware Persistence,
What is the company's process for conducting post-incident analysis ?
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as Symantec (research and analysis).
What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Multi-Layered Defenses, Real-Time Monitoring, Regular Software Patching, Incident Response Plans, Employee Training, Zero-Trust Approaches, , Patch And Secure Microsoft Exchange Servers, Restrict And Monitor The Use Of Legitimate Tools Like Syteca, Enhance Detection For Unusual Tools And Post-Ransomware Persistence, .
Additional Questions
General Information
What was the amount of the last ransom demanded ?
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was double-digit millions in some cases.
Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was an Qilin ransomware groupAkiraCl0p.
Incident Details
What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2025.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were millions of records and .
What was the most significant system affected in an incident ?
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was critical infrastructurecorporate networkspublic sector systems and Microsoft Exchange servers.
Response to the Incidents
What third-party assistance was involved in the most recent incident ?
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was Symantec (research and analysis).
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was millions of records.
What was the number of records exposed in the most significant breach ?
Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 8.0K.
Ransomware Information
What was the highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident ?
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was double-digit millions in some cases.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was The increasing use of artificial intelligence by threat actors enabled faster automation and targeting, while gaps in patching and remote access security continued to create vulnerabilities. Industries with complex supply chains or legacy systems were particularly at risk., Unusual tools (e.g., Syteca, GC2) and post-ransomware persistence suggest potential espionage motives. Legitimate software can be abused for malicious purposes, and attackers may use ransomware as a decoy.
What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Assume espionage motives if unusual tools or persistence behaviors are observed., Adopt multi-layered defenses, real-time monitoring, regular software patching, comprehensive incident response plans, employee training, and zero-trust approaches to mitigate future attacks., Implement network segmentation and enhanced monitoring to detect post-ransomware persistence., Patch and secure Microsoft Exchange servers to mitigate common entry points., Monitor and restrict the use of legitimate employee monitoring tools like Syteca to prevent abuse., Enhance detection capabilities for open-source pentesting tools (e.g. and GC2) used in attacks..
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are Symantec, Recorded Future News, UK National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC), Threat intelligence trackers, BeyondTrust and Cybersecurity intelligence reports.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Ongoing.
Initial Access Broker
What was the most recent entry point used by an initial access broker ?
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was an Microsoft Exchange servers.
What was the most recent reconnaissance period for an incident ?
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was 2 weeks.
Post-Incident Analysis
What was the most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was AI-driven automation by threat actorsgaps in patchingremote access security vulnerabilitieslegacy systems, Exploitation of Microsoft Exchange server vulnerabilitiesAbuse of legitimate employee monitoring software (Syteca)Use of open-source pentesting tools (GC2) for command execution and data exfiltration.
What was the most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was multi-layered defensesreal-time monitoringregular software patchingincident response plansemployee trainingzero-trust approaches, Patch and secure Microsoft Exchange serversRestrict and monitor the use of legitimate tools like SytecaEnhance detection for unusual tools and post-ransomware persistence.
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
SummaryA command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) has been found to exist in the `wrangler pages deploy` command. The issue occurs because the `--commit-hash` parameter is passed directly to a shell command without proper validation or sanitization, allowing an attacker with control of `--commit-hash` to execute arbitrary commands on the system running Wrangler. Root causeThe commitHash variable, derived from user input via the --commit-hash CLI argument, is interpolated directly into a shell command using template literals (e.g., execSync(`git show -s --format=%B ${commitHash}`)). Shell metacharacters are interpreted by the shell, enabling command execution. ImpactThis vulnerability is generally hard to exploit, as it requires --commit-hash to be attacker controlled. The vulnerability primarily affects CI/CD environments where `wrangler pages deploy` is used in automated pipelines and the --commit-hash parameter is populated from external, potentially untrusted sources. An attacker could exploit this to: * Run any shell command. * Exfiltrate environment variables. * Compromise the CI runner to install backdoors or modify build artifacts. Credits Disclosed responsibly by kny4hacker. Mitigation * Wrangler v4 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v4.59.1 or higher. * Wrangler v3 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v3.114.17 or higher. * Users on Wrangler v2 (EOL) should upgrade to a supported major version.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description
Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L).
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description
Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description
Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=blackfog' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
