Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Black & McDonald Engineering Services (US)Black & McDonald Engineering Services (US)
VS
SaipemSaipem
Black & McDonald Engineering Services (US)

Black & McDonald Engineering Services (US)

6001 E Front St, Kansas City, 64120, US

Last Update: 20/01/2026

View Profile

There is no outsourcing in our engineering team. Instead you will find an in-house department that consists of Professional Engineers, Designers, CAD Technicians and Field Technicians that possess a strong working knowledge of both the National Electric Safety Code and ...

NAICS:54139
NAICS Definition:Engineering Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Saipem

Saipem

Via Luigi Russolo, 5, Milan, 20138, IT

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.saipem.com
776/1000Fair

Saipem is a global leader in the engineering and construction of major projects for the energy and infrastructure sectors, both offshore and onshore. Saipem is “One Company” organized into business lines: Asset Based Services, Drilling, Energy Carriers, Offshore Wind, S...

NAICS:54139
NAICS Definition:Engineering Services
Employees:26,852
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Black & McDonald Engineering Services (US)

Black & McDonald Engineering Services (US)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Saipem

Saipem

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Black & McDonald Engineering Services (US) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Saipem in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Black & McDonald Engineering Services (US) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Black & McDonald Engineering Services (US) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Saipem (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Saipem cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Black & McDonald Engineering Services (US)

Black & McDonald Engineering Services (US)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Saipem

Saipem

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Black & McDonald Engineering Services (US) company and Saipem company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Black & McDonald Engineering Services (US) company and Saipem company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Black & McDonald Engineering Services (US) company and Saipem company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Black & McDonald Engineering Services (US) company and Saipem company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Black & McDonald Engineering Services (US) company and Saipem company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Black & McDonald Engineering Services (US) company and Saipem company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Black & McDonald Engineering Services (US) company and Saipem company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Black & McDonald Engineering Services (US) company and Saipem company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Black & McDonald Engineering Services (US) company and Saipem company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Black & McDonald Engineering Services (US) company and Saipem company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Black & McDonald Engineering Services (US) company and Saipem company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Black & McDonald Engineering Services (US) and Saipem, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Black & McDonald Engineering Services (US) and Saipem, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Black & McDonald Engineering Services (US) or Saipem ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Black & McDonald Engineering Services (US) or Saipem ?
Between Black & McDonald Engineering Services (US) and Saipem, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Black & McDonald Engineering Services (US) and Saipem, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-5270
SUMMARY

An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-5269
SUMMARY

In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51808
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51807
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-36035
SUMMARY

Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA