Comparison Overview
Black & Veatch

Black & Veatch
11401 Lamar Avenue, Overland Park, KS, US, 66211
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Black & Veatch is an employee-owned, global leader in building critical human infrastructure in Energy, Water, Digital Connectivity and Government Services. Since 1915, we have helped our clients improve business operations and the lives of people in over 100 countries ...

SYSTRA
72 rue Henry Farman, Paris, 75015, FR
Last Update: 02/04/2026
SYSTRA is one of the world's leading engineering and consultancy groups specialising in public transport and mobility solutions. For more than 65 years, the Group has been committed to helping cities and regions to contribute to their development by creating, improving ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Black & Veatch







SYSTRA






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Black & Veatch in 2026.
Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for SYSTRA in 2026.
Incident History - Black & Veatch (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Black & Veatch cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - SYSTRA (X = Date, Y = Severity)
SYSTRA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Black & Veatch

SYSTRA
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.