Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Black & Veatch - Environmental » FRACONBLA1766997330

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (FRACONBLA1766997330)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-282
Company Score Before Incident752 / 1000
Company Score After Incident470 / 1000
Company LinkView Black & Veatch - Environmental Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERFRACONBLA1766997330
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORPhishing (Spam Bomb Attacks), Social Engineering
DATA EXPOSEDSensitive data exfiltrated and encrypted
INCIDENT DATE03/06/2025
STATUSOngoing (Threat actor remains at large)

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Black & Veatch - Environmental's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Black & Veatch - Environmental Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Black & Veatch - Environmental breach identified under incident ID FRACONBLA1766997330.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Black & Veatch - Environmental's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/black-&-veatch---environmental, the number of followers: 1282, the industry type: Environmental Services and the number of employees: None employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 752 and after the incident was 470 with a difference of -282 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Black & Veatch - Environmental and their customers.

A newly reported cybersecurity incident, "Qakbot Malware Resurgence Post-FBI Takedown", has drawn attention.

Qakbot malware resurfaced with new 'spam bomb' attack tactics after the FBI's Operation Duck Hunt dismantled its infrastructure in August 2023.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Over 700,000 computers globally (200,000 in the US), and exposing Sensitive data exfiltrated and encrypted, plus an estimated financial loss of $58 million (ransomware-related losses).

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Seizure of 52 servers, $8.6 million in cryptocurrency confiscated (2023).

The case underscores how Ongoing (Threat actor remains at large), teams are taking away lessons such as Even high-profile law enforcement takedowns may only temporarily disrupt cybercriminal operations. Attackers adapt quickly, necessitating proactive defense strategies like endpoint protection and employee training, and recommending next steps like Invest in advanced antivirus and endpoint protection platforms, Implement employee training to recognize social engineering tactics and Enhance monitoring for suspicious activity.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Phishing: Spearphishing via Service (T1566.003) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating spam bomb attacks overwhelmed employees, attackers posed as IT staff and Phishing (T1566) with high confidence (95%), supported by evidence indicating phishing (Spam Bomb Attacks) listed as attack vector. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating tricking victims into executing malicious code. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified External Remote Services (T1133) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating system backdoors mentioned in operational impact. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Credentials from Password Stores (T1555) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating credential harvesting listed in operational impact and OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating implied by credentials harvested and ransomware deployment. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Masquerading (T1036) with moderate to high confidence (85%), supported by evidence indicating attackers posed as IT staff during social engineering and Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating qakbot resurfaced with more deceptive strategy. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Remote Services: Remote Desktop Protocol (T1021.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating implied by backdoors established and ransomware spread. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating data theft and sensitive data exfiltrated. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration such as Yes in ransomware details. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (95%), supported by evidence indicating data encryption such as Yes in ransomware details and Service Stop (T1489) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating implied by ransomware deployment and system backdoors. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Sources & References