Comparison Overview
BKB Infra

BKB Infra
Gouda, 2802 AL, NL
Last Update: 02/04/2026
BKB Infra is al meer dan 100 jaar gespecialiseerd in het ontwerpen, ontwikkelen en aanleggen van betonverhardingen. Betonnen wegen, paden en rotondes passend in de omgeving in verschillende kleuren en met verschillende afwerkingen, alles is mogelijk. BKB Infra maakt de ...

Tetra Tech
3475 East Foothill Blvd., Pasadena, 91107, US
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Tetra Tech is the leader in water, environment, and sustainable infrastructure, providing high-end consulting and engineering services for projects worldwide. With 25,000 employees working together, Tetra Tech provides clear solutions to complex problems by Leading with...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

BKB Infra







Tetra Tech






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for BKB Infra in 2026.
Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Tetra Tech in 2026.
Incident History - BKB Infra (X = Date, Y = Severity)
BKB Infra cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Tetra Tech (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Tetra Tech cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

BKB Infra

Tetra Tech
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.