Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Bitwarden

Bitwarden Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

bitwarden.com

Bitwarden empowers enterprises and individuals with trusted security solutions to manage sensitive information online. Explore Password Manager, Secrets Manager, and passkey innovations.


Bitwarden A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Bitwarden
Company Information
Website:https://bitwarden.com/
Employees number:240
Number of followers:35,664
NAICS:5112
Industry Type:Software Development
Homepage:bitwarden.com
Bitwarden Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 700 and 749
logo
BitwardenSoftware Development
Updated:
23/04/2026
728/1000
Moderate
Ba
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
Bitwarden Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
BitwardenSoftware Development
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

Bitwarden
BitwardenModerate
Current Score
728Ba (MODERATE)
01000
4 incidents
-30.33 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JUNE 2026
666Before Incident
MAY 2026
728Before Incident
Breach
02 May 2026Bitwarden
Trellix: Trellix Confirms Source Code Breach With Unauthorized Repository Access

Trellix Source Code Repository Breach

663After Incident
LOW-65
TRE1777710220
Trellix Confirms Source Code Repository Breach, Investigates Unauthorized Access Cybersecurity firm Trellix disclosed a security breach involving unauthorized access to a portion of its source code repositories. The company detected the compromise "recently" and has since engaged leading forensic experts to investigate the incident, while also notifying law enforcement. Trellix stated that its investigation has found no evidence that the accessed source code was exploited or that its release and distribution processes were impacted. However, the company did not specify the exact data accessed, the duration of the breach, or the threat actors responsible. Additional details will be shared as the investigation progresses. Formed in January 2022 through the merger of McAfee Enterprise and FireEye, Trellix is owned by Symphony Technology Group. The breach follows Google’s $5.4 billion acquisition of Mandiant, which was previously part of FireEye, around the same time. The incident remains under active investigation.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Unauthorized Access
IMPACT
Data Compromised: source code repositories
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: source code
APRIL 2026
749Before Incident
Cyber Attack
22 Apr 2026Bitwarden
Bitwarden: Bitwarden CLI npm package compromised to steal developer credentials

Bitwarden CLI Compromised in Supply Chain Attack Targeting npm

728After Incident
CRITICAL-21
BIT1776975830
Bitwarden CLI Compromised in Supply Chain Attack Targeting npm On April 22, 2026, attackers briefly compromised the Bitwarden CLI by uploading a malicious version of the `@bitwarden/cli` npm package (version 2026.4.0). The package, available between 5:57 PM and 7:30 PM ET, contained a credential-stealing payload designed to spread to other projects. Bitwarden confirmed the incident, stating the breach was limited to its npm distribution channel and did not affect end-user vault data, production systems, or the legitimate CLI codebase. The company revoked compromised access, deprecated the malicious release, and initiated remediation. ### Attack Details Security firms Socket, JFrog, and OX Security reported that threat actors likely exploited a compromised GitHub Action in Bitwarden’s CI/CD pipeline to inject malicious code. The package included a preinstall script and a custom loader (`bw_setup.js`) that checked for the Bun runtime downloading it if absent before executing an obfuscated JavaScript file (`bw1.js`). The malware targeted: - npm and GitHub authentication tokens - SSH keys - Cloud credentials (AWS, Azure, Google Cloud) Stolen data was encrypted with AES-256-GCM and exfiltrated via public GitHub repositories under victims’ accounts, marked with the string "Shai-Hulud: The Third Coming" a reference to prior npm supply chain attacks. The malware also had self-propagating capabilities, using stolen credentials to inject malicious code into other packages. ### Connections to Other Attacks The attack shares infrastructure and malware overlaps with a recent Checkmarx supply chain breach, including: - The same telemetry endpoint (`audit.checkmarx[.]cx/v1/telemetry`) - Identical obfuscation routines (`__decodeScrambled` with seed `0x3039`) - Similar credential theft and GitHub-based exfiltration tactics Both campaigns have been attributed to TeamPCP, a threat actor previously linked to attacks on Trivy and LiteLLM. Bitwarden’s investigation found no evidence of broader compromise, but developers who installed the affected version were advised to rotate exposed credentials, particularly those tied to CI/CD pipelines and cloud environments.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Supply Chain Attack
IMPACT
Data Compromised: npm and GitHub authentication tokens, SSH keys, cloud credentials (AWS, Azure, Google Cloud)Systems Affected: npm distribution channel, developer environmentsOperational Impact: Developers advised to rotate exposed credentialsBrand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage due to supply chain compromiseIdentity Theft Risk: High (stolen credentials could lead to identity theft)
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: Authentication tokens, SSH keys, cloud credentialsSensitivity Of Data: High (credentials for CI/CD pipelines and cloud environments)Data Exfiltration: Yes (via public GitHub repositories under victims’ accounts)Data Encryption: AES-256-GCM
MARCH 2026
749Before Incident
FEBRUARY 2026
748Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
753Before Incident
Vulnerability
01 Jan 2026Bitwarden
LastPass, Bitwarden and Dashlane: 25 Flaws Found in Cloud Password Managers Allow Unauthorized Access and Data Manipulation

Critical Vulnerabilities Exposed in Major Cloud Password Managers

748After Incident
CRITICAL-5
DASLASBIT1771317146
Critical Vulnerabilities Exposed in Major Cloud Password Managers Researchers from ETH Zurich’s Applied Cryptography Group have uncovered 25 severe security flaws in popular cloud-based password managers, including Bitwarden, LastPass, and Dashlane, which collectively serve around 60 million users worldwide. The findings challenge the long-held assumption of "zero-knowledge encryption" a security model where data remains encrypted even if servers are compromised. Led by Professor Kenneth Paterson, the team simulated a malicious server threat model, testing how browser extensions responded when servers were compromised. The results revealed client-side vulnerabilities that could allow attackers with server access to view, modify, or delete stored passwords, logins, and sensitive data. Bitwarden was found to have 12 vulnerabilities, LastPass 7, and Dashlane 6, with some flaws enabling full organization vault compromises or unauthorized access via sync manipulation. Key issues stem from outdated cryptographic practices and user-friendly features like password recovery and sharing, which introduce complexity and expand the attack surface. Doctoral student Matteo Scarlata noted that many vendors rely on 1990s-era encryption to avoid disrupting users or causing downtime, undermining the security guarantees of zero-knowledge architectures. The vulnerabilities, assigned CVE IDs with CVSS scores ranging from 7.5 to 8.5, include: - Bitwarden: Unauthorized vault access, integrity violations in shared credentials, and full organization vault compromise. - LastPass: Password recovery bypass and credential modification attacks. - Dashlane: Legacy crypto decryption leaks. The researchers followed responsible disclosure, giving vendors 90 days to address the flaws. While patches are now being rolled out, the findings highlight a critical weakness: even encrypted data can be manipulated if servers are compromised. The incident underscores the need for regular external audits, transparent security practices, and migration to modern cryptographic standards rather than relying on incremental fixes.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Breach/Vulnerability Exposure
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Stored passwords, logins, and sensitive dataSystems Affected: Cloud-based password managers (Bitwarden, LastPass, Dashlane)Operational Impact: Potential unauthorized access and manipulation of encrypted dataBrand Reputation Impact: HighIdentity Theft Risk: High
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: Passwords, logins, sensitive dataSensitivity Of Data: High (Personally Identifiable Information, credentials)Data Encryption: Compromised (zero-knowledge encryption bypass)Personally Identifiable Information: Yes
DECEMBER 2025
753Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2025
753Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
753Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2025
752Before Incident
AUGUST 2025
752Before Incident
JULY 2025
752Before Incident
MAY 2025
754Before Incident
Vulnerability
01 May 2025Bitwarden
Bitwarden

Unpatched Clickjacking Flaws in Major Password Managers Expose User Credentials, 2FA Codes, and Credit Card Details

752After Incident
CRITICAL-2
BIT539083025
Bitwarden, a widely used password manager with millions of users, was found vulnerable to unpatched clickjacking flaws that allow attackers to steal account credentials, 2FA codes, and credit card details via malicious websites or XSS-compromised pages. The exploit manipulates UI opacity and overlays to trick users into triggering autofill actions, leaking sensitive data without their knowledge. While Bitwarden acknowledged the issue, they initially downplayed its severity before releasing a partial fix in version 2025.8.0. However, earlier versions (e.g., 2025.7.0) remained exposed, putting users at risk of credential theft, financial fraud, and identity compromise. The flaw was publicly disclosed at DEF CON 33, increasing the likelihood of exploitation by threat actors. Users were advised to disable autofill or update immediately to mitigate risks, though residual vulnerabilities may persist in certain attack scenarios.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Vulnerability DisclosureClickjacking AttackData Leakage
MOTIVATION
Research/DisclosureFinancial Gain (Credential Theft)Fraud (Credit Card Theft)Account Takeover
IMPACT
Account Credentials2FA CodesCredit Card DetailsBrowser Extensions of Password ManagersPotential Erosion of Trust in Password Manager SecurityNegative Media CoverageIdentity Theft Risk: High (Due to Credential and PII Exposure)Payment Information Risk: High (Credit Card Details at Risk)
DATA BREACH
Account Credentials2FA CodesCredit Card DetailsSensitivity Of Data: High (PII, Financial Data, Authentication Credentials)Data Exfiltration: Potential (Via Autofill Leakage)UsernamesPasswordsCredit Card Numbers

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for Bitwarden ?
?
What was Bitwarden's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was Bitwarden's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was Bitwarden's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was Bitwarden's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was Bitwarden's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was Bitwarden's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was Bitwarden's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was Bitwarden's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was Bitwarden's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What was Bitwarden's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ?
?
What was Bitwarden's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on Bitwarden's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with Bitwarden ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view Bitwarden's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?