Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

BitrefillBitrefill
VS
Rover.comRover.com
Bitrefill

Bitrefill

55 E 3rd Ave, Stockholm, 111 56, SE

Last Update: 17/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://bitrefill.com
728/1000Moderate

You earn internet money. We help you spend it. Bitrefill has been turning crypto into everyday purchases since 2014 - giftcards, prepaid cards, and eSIMs in 180+ countries. Because internet money should work everywhere the internet does. Bitrefill has been remote fir...

NAICS:81
NAICS Definition:Other Services (except Public Administration)
Employees:66
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Rover.com

Rover.com

720 Olive Way, Seattle, Washington, US, 98101

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.rover.com
792/1000Fair

At Rover, everyone has ownership of their work and the opportunity to make a true impact. We believe that being diverse and inclusive is key to our success and encourage every employee to share their unique perspective while being their true self. We believe everyone ...

NAICS:81
NAICS Definition:Other Services (except Public Administration)
Employees:11,132
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Bitrefill

Bitrefill

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Rover.com

Rover.com

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Avg (This Year)

Bitrefill has 22.48% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rover.com in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Bitrefill (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bitrefill cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Rover.com (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rover.com cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Bitrefill

Bitrefill

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
BIT1773771997
Rover.com

Rover.com

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Bitrefill company and Rover.com company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Bitrefill company and Rover.com company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Bitrefill company and Rover.com company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Bitrefill company and Rover.com company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Bitrefill company and Rover.com company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Bitrefill company and Rover.com company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Bitrefill company and Rover.com company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Bitrefill company and Rover.com company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Bitrefill company and Rover.com company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Bitrefill company and Rover.com company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Bitrefill company and Rover.com company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Bitrefill and Rover.com, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Bitrefill and Rover.com, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Bitrefill or Rover.com ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Bitrefill or Rover.com ?
Between Bitrefill and Rover.com, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Bitrefill and Rover.com, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-56414
SUMMARY

A vulnerability exists in H.View IP cameras certificate-related upload interfaces allow authenticated users to store arbitrary file content to fixed, persistent filesystem locations without validating file type, structure, or size. This design omission enables the placement of unexpected or malformed data in locations intended for trusted certificate material, which could affect system integrity or behavior even after reboot.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-26
UPDATED
Date2026-06-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-55975
SUMMARY

A vulnerability exists in H.View IP cameras that could allow an authenticated user to supply unsanitized XML fields to the device's certificate generation interface, which are incorporated into a backend certificate creation command without proper input validation. This may allow for command execution with elevated privileges during certificate generation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-26
UPDATED
Date2026-06-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-33560
SUMMARY

The DMP-5000 file service exposes authenticated arbitrary file upload functionality. There are exposed endpoints which allows authenticated users to upload files of any type without validation. No file extension filtering or content inspection is enforced which allows executable binaries and scripts to be accepted and written directly to the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-26
UPDATED
Date2026-06-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:N/SC:L/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-31928
SUMMARY

The DMP-5000 devices are shipped with a default administrative web account with weak authentication controls, which are not required to be changed during initial configuration or operation. Using these accounts provides full system access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-26
UPDATED
Date2026-06-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-28701
SUMMARY

Various versions of Daktronics Controller Firmware could allow authenticated and unauthenticated remote users to escape the intended directory and enumerate arbitrary file system paths.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-26
UPDATED
Date2026-06-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9