Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

BitrefillBitrefill
VS
Great Clips Inc.Great Clips Inc.
Bitrefill

Bitrefill

55 E 3rd Ave, Stockholm, 111 56, SE

Last Update: 17/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://bitrefill.com
728/1000Moderate

You earn internet money. We help you spend it. Bitrefill has been turning crypto into everyday purchases since 2014 - giftcards, prepaid cards, and eSIMs in 180+ countries. Because internet money should work everywhere the internet does. Bitrefill has been remote fir...

NAICS:81
NAICS Definition:Other Services (except Public Administration)
Employees:66
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Great Clips Inc.

Great Clips Inc.

4400 W. 78th St., Minneapolis, 55435, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://jobs.greatclips.com/
789/1000Fair

Established in Minneapolis in 1982, Great Clips has grown to be the world's largest and fastest growing salon brand. There are more than 4,400 salons throughout the United States and Canada -- all of them owned by franchisees. Visit us at www.greatclips.com Employment ...

NAICS:81
NAICS Definition:Other Services (except Public Administration)
Employees:12,370
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Bitrefill

Bitrefill

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Great Clips Inc.

Great Clips Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Avg (This Year)

Bitrefill has 20.63% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Great Clips Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Bitrefill (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bitrefill cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Great Clips Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Great Clips Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Bitrefill

Bitrefill

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
BIT1773771997
Great Clips Inc.

Great Clips Inc.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Bitrefill company and Great Clips Inc. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Bitrefill company and Great Clips Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Bitrefill company and Great Clips Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Bitrefill company and Great Clips Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Bitrefill company and Great Clips Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Bitrefill company and Great Clips Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Bitrefill company and Great Clips Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Bitrefill company and Great Clips Inc. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Bitrefill company and Great Clips Inc. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Bitrefill company and Great Clips Inc. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Bitrefill company and Great Clips Inc. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Bitrefill and Great Clips Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Bitrefill and Great Clips Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Bitrefill or Great Clips Inc. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Bitrefill or Great Clips Inc. ?
Between Bitrefill and Great Clips Inc., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Bitrefill and Great Clips Inc., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-73250
SUMMARY

Notepad++ is a free and open-source source code editor. Prior to 8.9.7, the Notepad++ Windows 11 x64 and ARM64 installer passes the attacker-influenced installation directory `$INSTDIR` from PowerEditor/installer/nppSetup.nsi into a PowerShell `-Command` string used by RegisterMSIX to invoke Add-AppxPackage, allowing PowerShell subexpression syntax such as `$()` in the installation path to execute commands in the installer's security context when the context menu component is selected. This issue is fixed in version 8.9.7.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-11
UPDATED
Date2026-08-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-73249
SUMMARY

calibre is an e-book manager. Prior to 9.12.0, the calibre Content Server endpoint POST /book-update-annotations/{library_id}/{book_id}/{fmt} in src/calibre/srv/books.py omits needs_db_write=True, causing Router.dispatch() to skip ctx.check_for_write_access() before update_annotations() passes attacker-controlled JSON to db.merge_annotations_for_book(), which allows a readonly user or an anonymous user on an unauthenticated deployment to persist unauthorized book annotation changes. This issue is fixed in version 9.12.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-11
UPDATED
Date2026-08-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-73248
SUMMARY

calibre is an e-book manager. Prior to 9.12.0, calibre processes attacker-controlled composite_template metadata from a malicious EPUB, OPF, PDF, or similar file through program: and a nested template() call whose formatter does not inherit allow_python_templates=False, allowing a nested python: template to reach compile_python_template and execute arbitrary Python code when the file is opened or imported. This issue is fixed in version 9.12.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-11
UPDATED
Date2026-08-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-73247
SUMMARY

Kestra is an open-source, event-driven orchestration platform. Prior to 2.0.0, Kestra's core/src/main/java/io/kestra/core/runners/pebble/functions/HttpFunction.java passes the user-controlled http() uri argument to URI.create() and the server-side HTTP client without restricting private, loopback, or link-local destinations, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to import and execute a flow that accesses internal services or cloud metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-11
UPDATED
Date2026-08-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-73246
SUMMARY

Kestra is an open-source, event-driven orchestration platform. Prior to 2.0.0-rc6, Kestra's worker/src/main/java/io/kestra/worker/endpoint/WorkerEndpoint.java serves GET /worker without authentication and serializes the complete live Task object, which can expose commands, environment variables, HTTP headers, connection details, plaintext credentials, and execution identifiers while the main API on port 8080 remains protected. This issue is fixed in 2.0.0-rc6.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-11
UPDATED
Date2026-08-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9