Comparison Overview
幣託集團 BitoGroup

幣託集團 BitoGroup
37F., No. 7, Sec. 5, Xinyi Rd., Xinyi Dist., Taipei City, TW
Last Update: 02/04/2026
幣託集團(BitoGroup)成立於2014年,致力於用最簡單的方式讓區塊鏈進入每個人的日常生活,並協助企業與消費者進入Web3時代。幣託集團致力於運用區塊鏈和高頻交易技術,積極打造創新的金融基礎設施。集團旗下擁有多元化業務,包括BitoPro加密貨幣交易所、NFT賦能平台BELS,以及O2 META。 BitoPro為全臺第一家安全、穩定且易於使用的加密貨幣交易所,BitoPro提供加密貨幣錢包和交易所的區塊鏈服務。此外,亦支援在超商購買或點數兌換加密貨幣。BitoPro支援多種主流幣種,如ETH(以太幣)、USDT(泰達幣)、DO...

DNB
Dronning Eufemias gate 30, Oslo, 0191, NO
Last Update: 02/04/2026
We are here. So you can stay ahead. For nearly two hundred years we have acquired and shared knowledge, developed global networks and adapted to modern everyday life. To us, it is important to combine profitability with responsibility. DNB is Norway's largest financi...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

幣託集團 BitoGroup







DNB






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for 幣託集團 BitoGroup in 2026.
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for DNB in 2026.
Incident History - 幣託集團 BitoGroup (X = Date, Y = Severity)
幣託集團 BitoGroup cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - DNB (X = Date, Y = Severity)
DNB cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

幣託集團 BitoGroup

DNB
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Improper Handling of Highly Compressed Data (Data Amplification) vulnerability in elixir-grpc grpc (GRPC.Compressor.Gzip, GRPC.Message modules) allows a denial of service via a gzip decompression bomb. This vulnerability is associated with program files lib/grpc/compressor/gzip.ex, lib/grpc/message.ex and program routines 'Elixir.GRPC.Compressor.Gzip':decompress/1, 'Elixir.GRPC.Message':from_data/2. 'Elixir.GRPC.Compressor.Gzip':decompress/1 calls :zlib.gunzip/1 directly on attacker-controlled bytes with no decompressed-size limit, ratio check, or incremental decoding. Because this module is the registered gzip GRPC.Compressor implementation, it is invoked automatically whenever an incoming gRPC frame carries the grpc-encoding: gzip header. :zlib.gunzip/1 allocates the entire decompressed result as a single binary, so a small highly compressible payload (for example a few kilobytes of zeros, which gzip compresses at roughly 1000:1) expands to multiple gigabytes inside a single call. The max_receive_message_length limit is enforced only against the already-decompressed message, so it provides no protection. An unauthenticated remote peer can send a single crafted frame to exhaust the BEAM node's heap and trigger an out-of-memory kill. This issue affects grpc: from 0.4.0 before 1.0.0.
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in elixir-grpc grpc allows unauthenticated attackers to exhaust the BEAM's memory and crash the server by streaming a large or slow-trickle unary request body. 'Elixir.GRPC.Server.Adapters.Cowboy.Handler':read_full_body/3 (lib/grpc/server/adapters/cowboy/handler.ex) accumulates every received chunk into a single growing binary with no size cap. Additionally, when the client omits the grpc-timeout header, the per-chunk read timeout resolves to :infinity, allowing a slow-trickle client to keep the connection alive indefinitely while memory grows. A single connection is sufficient to exhaust server memory and crash the node. This issue affects grpc from 0.3.1 before 1.0.0.
Deserialization of Untrusted Data and Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerabilities in elixir-grpc grpc allow unauthenticated attackers to crash the BEAM node via atom table exhaustion and, when a decoded term flows into a call site that invokes it, achieve remote code execution on the server. 'Elixir.GRPC.Codec.Erlpack':decode/2 (lib/grpc/codec/erlpack.ex) calls :erlang.binary_to_term/1 on the raw gRPC message body without the :safe option, no size bound, and no type guard. Any unauthenticated peer that sends a request with Content-Type: application/grpc+erlpack can send a crafted payload that mints arbitrary new atoms (which are never garbage-collected, exhausting the bounded atom table and crashing the VM) or that encodes a fun term which, if applied anywhere downstream, executes attacker-controlled code inside the server process. This issue affects grpc from 0.4.0 before 1.0.0.
The browserstack-cypress-cli is BrowserStack's CLI which allows users to run Cypress tests on BrowserStack. Versions prior to 1.36.4 are vulnerable to OS command injection via the cypress_config_file configuration parameter. In readCypressConfigUtil.js, the loadJsFile() function constructs a shell command by interpolating the user-controlled cypress_config_filepath value into a template literal, then executes it via child_process.execSync(). Shell metacharacters in the config path (specifically " and ;) allow breaking out of the quoted argument and injecting arbitrary commands. This issue has been fixed in version 1.36.6.
Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in elixir-grpc grpc allows authenticated attackers to access or modify resources belonging to other users by smuggling a conflicting value for any path-bound field via the query string or request body. In 'Elixir.GRPC.Server.Transcode':map_request/5 (lib/grpc/server/transcode.ex), all three clauses use Map.merge/2 with path bindings as the first argument, giving them the lowest merge precedence. A request such as GET /users/me/profile?user_id=victim (or a POST with {"user_id": "victim"} when body: "*") yields a decoded protobuf struct where the path-bound field carries the attacker-supplied value rather than the router-extracted value. Any handler that uses the path-bound field for authorization, multi-tenancy scoping, or ownership checks is silently bypassed. This issue affects grpc from 0.8.0 before 1.0.0.