Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

幣託集團 BitoGroup幣託集團 BitoGroup
VS
BNP Paribas CIBBNP Paribas CIB
幣託集團 BitoGroup

幣託集團 BitoGroup

37F., No. 7, Sec. 5, Xinyi Rd., Xinyi Dist., Taipei City, TW

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.bitopro.com
718/1000Moderate

幣託集團(BitoGroup)成立於2014年,致力於用最簡單的方式讓區塊鏈進入每個人的日常生活,並協助企業與消費者進入Web3時代。幣託集團致力於運用區塊鏈和高頻交易技術,積極打造創新的金融基礎設施。集團旗下擁有多元化業務,包括BitoPro加密貨幣交易所、NFT賦能平台BELS,以及O2 META。 BitoPro為全臺第一家安全、穩定且易於使用的加密貨幣交易所,BitoPro提供加密貨幣錢包和交易所的區塊鏈服務。此外,亦支援在超商購買或點數兌換加密貨幣。BitoPro支援多種主流幣種,如ETH(以太幣)、USDT(泰達幣)、DO...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:75
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
BNP Paribas CIB

BNP Paribas CIB

16 Boulevard des Italiens, Paris, France, FR, 75009

Last Update: 28/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://cib.bnpparibas/
786/1000Fair

In a changing world, we aim at anticipating transformation and driving your company for success. We are convinced to have the expertise and networks you need to develop your business. BNP Paribas Corporate and Institutional Banking is a leading global financial partner...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:15,383
Subsidiaries:27
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
幣託集團 BitoGroup

幣託集團 BitoGroup

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
BNP Paribas CIB

BNP Paribas CIB

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 幣託集團 BitoGroup in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BNP Paribas CIB in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - 幣託集團 BitoGroup (X = Date, Y = Severity)

幣託集團 BitoGroup cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - BNP Paribas CIB (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BNP Paribas CIB cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
幣託集團 BitoGroup

幣託集團 BitoGroup

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
BIT301062025
BNP Paribas CIB

BNP Paribas CIB

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between 幣託集團 BitoGroup company and BNP Paribas CIB company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between 幣託集團 BitoGroup company and BNP Paribas CIB company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between 幣託集團 BitoGroup company and BNP Paribas CIB company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between 幣託集團 BitoGroup company and BNP Paribas CIB company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between 幣託集團 BitoGroup company and BNP Paribas CIB company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between 幣託集團 BitoGroup company and BNP Paribas CIB company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between 幣託集團 BitoGroup company and BNP Paribas CIB company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between 幣託集團 BitoGroup company and BNP Paribas CIB company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between 幣託集團 BitoGroup company and BNP Paribas CIB company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between 幣託集團 BitoGroup company and BNP Paribas CIB company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between 幣託集團 BitoGroup company and BNP Paribas CIB company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between 幣託集團 BitoGroup and BNP Paribas CIB, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between 幣託集團 BitoGroup and BNP Paribas CIB, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - 幣託集團 BitoGroup or BNP Paribas CIB ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - 幣託集團 BitoGroup or BNP Paribas CIB ?
Between 幣託集團 BitoGroup and BNP Paribas CIB, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between 幣託集團 BitoGroup and BNP Paribas CIB, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-56078
SUMMARY

PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-18
UPDATED
Date2026-06-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56077
SUMMARY

PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-18
UPDATED
Date2026-06-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56076
SUMMARY

PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-18
UPDATED
Date2026-06-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56075
SUMMARY

PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-18
UPDATED
Date2026-06-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56074
SUMMARY

PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-18
UPDATED
Date2026-06-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8