Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Bitdefender CZ & SKBitdefender CZ & SK
VS
Alibaba.comAlibaba.com
Bitdefender CZ & SK

Bitdefender CZ & SK

Jordánská 391, Praha, 198 00, CZ

Last Update: 27/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.bitdefender.cz/
752/1000Fair

Společnost Bitdefender je lídrem v oblasti kybernetické bezpečnosti, který poskytuje nejlepší řešení prevence, detekce a reakce na hrozby ve své třídě po celém světě. Bitdefender střeží miliony spotřebitelů, firem a státních úřadů a organizací, a je důvěryhodným odborn...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Alibaba.com

Alibaba.com

699 Wang Shang Road, Hangzhou, 310052, CN

Last Update: 05/07/2026

View Profile
827/1000Good

The first business of Alibaba Group, Alibaba.com (www.alibaba.com) is the leading platform for global wholesale trade serving millions of buyers and suppliers around the world. Through Alibaba.com, small businesses can sell their products to companies in other countries...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:28,735
Subsidiaries:22
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Bitdefender CZ & SK

Bitdefender CZ & SK

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Alibaba.com

Alibaba.com

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bitdefender CZ & SK in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alibaba.com in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Bitdefender CZ & SK (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bitdefender CZ & SK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Alibaba.com (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alibaba.com cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Bitdefender CZ & SK

Bitdefender CZ & SK

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Alibaba.com

Alibaba.com

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ALI212330922

FAQ

Between Bitdefender CZ & SK company and Alibaba.com company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Bitdefender CZ & SK company and Alibaba.com company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Bitdefender CZ & SK company and Alibaba.com company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Bitdefender CZ & SK company and Alibaba.com company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Bitdefender CZ & SK company and Alibaba.com company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Bitdefender CZ & SK company and Alibaba.com company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Bitdefender CZ & SK company and Alibaba.com company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Bitdefender CZ & SK company and Alibaba.com company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Bitdefender CZ & SK company and Alibaba.com company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Bitdefender CZ & SK company and Alibaba.com company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Bitdefender CZ & SK company and Alibaba.com company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Bitdefender CZ & SK and Alibaba.com, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Bitdefender CZ & SK and Alibaba.com, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Bitdefender CZ & SK or Alibaba.com ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Bitdefender CZ & SK or Alibaba.com ?
Between Bitdefender CZ & SK and Alibaba.com, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Bitdefender CZ & SK and Alibaba.com, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2