Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BITBundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT
VS
TietoevryTietoevry
Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT

Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT

Eichenweg 3, Zollikofen, undefined, 3052, CH

Last Update: 13/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.bit.admin.ch
758/1000Fair

Wir als Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation (BIT) versorgen die Bundesverwaltung mit IT-Leistungen. Wir entwickeln und betreiben wirtschaftliche, sichere und benutzerfreundliche Lösungen für unsere Partner. Als BIT sind wir zuständig für den Betrieb von Re...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:1,946
Subsidiaries:68
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Tietoevry

Tietoevry

Helsinki, FI-02101, FI

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.tietoevry.com
731/1000Moderate

In a rapidly changing world, technology is everything. It's in the fabric of society. In every part of every business. At the very heart of human evolution. It’s a great power that comes with great responsibility. At Tietoevry, we believe it’s time to shift perspective...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:11,643
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT

Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Tietoevry

Tietoevry

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tietoevry in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Tietoevry (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tietoevry cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT

Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Tietoevry

Tietoevry

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
TIE224771222

FAQ

Between Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT company and Tietoevry company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT company and Tietoevry company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT company and Tietoevry company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT company and Tietoevry company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT company and Tietoevry company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT company and Tietoevry company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT company and Tietoevry company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT company and Tietoevry company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT company and Tietoevry company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT company and Tietoevry company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT company and Tietoevry company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT and Tietoevry, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT and Tietoevry, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT or Tietoevry ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT or Tietoevry ?
Between Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT and Tietoevry, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT and Tietoevry, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8