Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BITBundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT
VS
TEKsystemsTEKsystems
Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT

Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT

Eichenweg 3, Zollikofen, undefined, 3052, CH

Last Update: 13/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.bit.admin.ch
758/1000Fair

Wir als Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation (BIT) versorgen die Bundesverwaltung mit IT-Leistungen. Wir entwickeln und betreiben wirtschaftliche, sichere und benutzerfreundliche Lösungen für unsere Partner. Als BIT sind wir zuständig für den Betrieb von Re...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:1,946
Subsidiaries:68
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
TEKsystems

TEKsystems

7437 Race Road, Hanover, MD, US, 21076

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.teksystems.com
709/1000Moderate

We’re TEKsystems and TEKsystems Global Services. We accelerate business transformation for our customers, so they can capitalize on change and master the momentum of technology. Our expertise in strategy, design, execution and operations unlocks business value through a...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:27,179
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT

Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
TEKsystems

TEKsystems

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TEKsystems in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - TEKsystems (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TEKsystems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT

Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
TEKsystems

TEKsystems

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
ALLTEKAERMAR1771086448

FAQ

Between Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT company and TEKsystems company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT company and TEKsystems company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT company and TEKsystems company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT company and TEKsystems company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT company and TEKsystems company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT company and TEKsystems company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT company and TEKsystems company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT company and TEKsystems company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT company and TEKsystems company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT company and TEKsystems company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT company and TEKsystems company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT and TEKsystems, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT and TEKsystems, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT or TEKsystems ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT or TEKsystems ?
Between Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT and TEKsystems, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT and TEKsystems, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-8325
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through Autodesk Revit, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7867
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in udisks2. A local attacker with an active console session can exploit insufficient authorization checking on the 'as-user' option in the org.freedesktop.UDisks2.Filesystem.Mount() D-Bus method. This allows the attacker to spoof the 'as-user' parameter, mounting filesystems on behalf of arbitrary users, including privileged accounts. This can lead to local privilege escalation through mount point injection and manipulation of the mount namespace visible to privileged users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7406
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted BMP file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Untrusted Pointer Dereference vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7405
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted TIF file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products during image import, can cause an Out-of-Bounds Read in the image handling library. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial of service

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-71555
SUMMARY

PILOS (Platform for Interactive Live-Online Seminars) is a frontend for BigBlueButton. From 2.1.0 until 4.14.1, PILOS does not send a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy response header, so pages opened by PILOS via a link that opens a new browsing context (e.g., target="_blank") retain a window.opener reference back to the originating PILOS tab. A malicious destination page reached this way can use window.opener to navigate or manipulate the original PILOS tab, a technique known as reverse tabnabbing, potentially redirecting an authenticated user to a phishing page that mimics PILOS. This issue is fixed in version 4.14.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3