Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BITBundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT
VS
ReplyReply
Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT

Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT

Eichenweg 3, Zollikofen, undefined, 3052, CH

Last Update: 13/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.bit.admin.ch
758/1000Fair

Wir als Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation (BIT) versorgen die Bundesverwaltung mit IT-Leistungen. Wir entwickeln und betreiben wirtschaftliche, sichere und benutzerfreundliche Lösungen für unsere Partner. Als BIT sind wir zuständig für den Betrieb von Re...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:1,946
Subsidiaries:68
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Reply

Reply

C.so Francia, 110, Turin, 10143, IT

Last Update: 09/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.reply.com
769/1000Fair

Reply [EXM, STAR: REY] specialises in the design and implementation of solutions based on new communication channels and digital media. As a network of highly specialised companies, Reply defines and develops business models enabled by the new models of AI, big data, cl...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:16,816
Subsidiaries:117
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT

Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Reply

Reply

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Reply in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Reply (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Reply cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT

Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Reply

Reply

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT company and Reply company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT company and Reply company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT company and Reply company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT company and Reply company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT company and Reply company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT company and Reply company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT company and Reply company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT company and Reply company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT company and Reply company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT company and Reply company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT company and Reply company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT and Reply, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT and Reply, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT or Reply ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT or Reply ?
Between Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT and Reply, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Bundesamt für Informatik und Telekommunikation BIT and Reply, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3